| Literature DB >> 30258924 |
Danyi Peng1, Daozhu Si1, Rong Zhang1, Jiang Liu1, Hao Gou1, Yunqiu Xia1,2, Daiyin Tian1,2, Jihong Dai1,2, Ke Yang1,3, Enmei Liu1,2, Yujun Shi4, Q Richard Lu5, Lin Zou1,6,3, Zhou Fu1,2,3.
Abstract
Alveolar epithelial cells (AECs) injury and failed reconstitution of the AECs barrier are both integral to alveolar flooding and subsequent pulmonary fibrosis (PF). Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms regulating the regeneration of AECs post-injury still remain unclear. SMARCA4 is a part of the large ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complex SWI/SNF, which is essential for kidney and heart fibrosis. We investigates SMARCA4 function in lung fibrosis by establishing PF mice model with bleomycin firstly and found that the expression of SMARCA4 was mainly enhanced in alveolar type II (ATII) cells. Moreover, we established an alveolar epithelium-specific SMARCA4-deleted SP-C-rtTA/(tetO) 7 -Cre/SMARCA4 f/f mice (SOSM4 Δ/Δ ) model, as well as a new SMARCA4-deleted alveolar type II (ATII)-like mle-12 cell line. We found that the bleomycin-induced PF was more aggressive in SOSM4 Δ/Δ mice. Also, the proliferation of ATII cells was decreased with the loss of SMARCA4 in vivo and in vitro. In addition, we observed increased proliferation of ATII cells accompanied by abnormally high expression of SMARCA4 in human PF lung sections. These data uncovered the indispensable role of SMARCA4 in the proliferation of ATII cells, which might affect the progression of PF.Entities:
Keywords: Cell proliferation; Pulmonary fibrosis; SMARCA4; Transgenic mice; Type II alveolar epithelial cells
Year: 2017 PMID: 30258924 PMCID: PMC6147121 DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2017.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Dis ISSN: 2352-3042
Figure 1Elevation of SMARCA4 expression in the lung epithelium of BLM induced pulmonary fibrosis mice. (A) Representative images of immunohistochemistry for SMARCA4 (brown) of lung sections at 21 days post- saline (sham, n = 10) or 5 mg/kg of bleomycin (BLM, n = 20) administration. Scale bars: upper panels, 50 μm; lower panels, 20 μm. Quantitative evaluation is shown in (C). The number of SMARCA4+ cells were counted, and data were expressed as percentage of SMARCA4+ cells to total number of cells in fifteen random fields. (B) The expression levels of SMARCA4 protein were determined by immunoblotting of the whole lung lysates. β-actin was used as a loading control. Quantitative evaluation is shown in (D). (E) Representative flow cytometry data of isolated ATII cells. Left, co-staining for CD45 and Ep-CAM; middle, co-staining for cytokeratin and Ep-CAM; right, co-staining for SPC and Ep-CAM. (F) Number of ATII cells recovered from mice in sham and BLM groups. (G) Representative images of SMARCA4 expression in the isolated ATII cells (immunoblotting). Quantitative evaluation is shown on the right. Western blots were cut before antibody exposure and therefore cropped blots are displayed. (H) and (I) Representative flow cytometry data of SMARCA4+ or BrdU+ cells in the isolated ATII cells. Quantitative evaluations were both shown on the right. For ATII cells, trials repeated three times. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01.
Figure 2Pulmonary epithelial SMARCA4-deleted mice were viable and healthy. (A) The expression levels of SMARCA4 protein were determined by immunoblotting of the isolated ATII cells from mice with indicated genotypes after Dox treatment. β-actin was used as a loading control. Quantitative evaluations were shown on the right. Western blots were cut before antibody exposure and therefore cropped blots are displayed. (B) Representative flow cytometry data of SMARCA4+ cells in the isolated ATII cells. Quantitative evaluations were both shown on the right. Trials repeated three times. (C) Quantitative evaluation of the histological findings by ashcroft score. (D) H&E, MT staining of lung sections of SOSM4 and SOSM4 mice and their littermates (WT) (n = 5 for each group.) Scale bars: 40 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05.
Figure 3Epithelial SMARCA4 deficiency aggravates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis.SOSM4 mice and their littermates (WT) were fed with Dox for one week and then treated with 2.5 mg/kg BLM and sacrificed 21 days post- BLM injury. Mice treated with saline were used as control (sham). (A) Immunoblots of SMARCA4 protein in the lysates of isolated ATII cells. β-actin was used as a loading control. Quantitative evaluations were shown below. Western blots were cut before antibody exposure and therefore cropped blots are displayed. (B) Representative flow cytometry data of SMARCA4+ cells in the isolated ATII cells. Quantitative evaluations were shown in (C). Trials repeated three times. (D) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for SOSM4 and WT mice 21 days after saline or BLM intratracheal injection. (E) Collagen contents (Col. Cont.) in the right lungs (RL) assessed by Sircol assay. (F) Representative pictures of H&E and MT staining. Scale bars: 100 μm. (G) Ashcroft score of the H&E and MT staining. (n = 5 each group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 4SMARCA4 depletion attenuates proliferation of ATII cells WT and SOSM4 mice were treated with 5 mg/kg (for WT) or 2.5 mg/kg (for SOSM4) of bleomycin (BLM) following feeding with Dox for one week. SOSM4 mice treated with saline (sham) were used as a control. (A) Immunohistochemistry for SPC, CD11b and α-SMA of lung sections 21 days post- BLM administration. Scale bars: 20 μm. (B)–(D) Quantification of SPC positive areas in forty random fields, and CD11b or α-SMA positive areas in fifteen random fields respectively. (n = 4 in each group) (E) Number of ATII cells recovered from the mice 21 days post- BLM administration. (F) Representative flow cytometry data of SPC+, CD11b+ or α-SMA+ cells in the lung tissue homogenates 21 days post- BLM administration. Quantitative evaluations were shown on the right separately. (G) Representative flow cytometry data of BrdU+ cells in the isolated ATII cells 14 days post- BLM administration. Quantitative evaluations were shown on the right. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three repeated trials. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5SMARCA4 depletion attenuates proliferation of AEII cells (A) The expression of SMARCA4 and PCNA were detected by immunoblotting of cells lysates from mle-12 infected with scRNA or siRNA of SMARCA4 for 48 h. The quantitative comparisons were performed by using β-action as loading control. Western blots were cut before antibody exposure and therefore cropped blots are displayed. (B) The normalized proliferation curves of the mle-12 cells infected with scRNA and siRNA of SMARCA4, measured by CCK8 staining. (C) The mle-12 cells were transfected with scRNA or siRNA of SMARCA4 for 48 h, their viability was assessed by bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. Representative BrdU immunofluorescence pictures were shown in (D) Scale bars: 100 μm. (E) Cell cycle distribution was measured by PI staining followed by flow cytometry. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for three trials. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 6ATII cells of human IPF lung tissues showed enhancement of SMARCA4 expression. (A) Representative images of H&E and immunohistochemistry for SMARCA4 and SPC of lung serial sections from donors and IPF patients. Right panels are magnified view of the squares in the left panels. In control tissues (Ctrl.), only subtle expressions of SMARCA4 protein are detected in the SPC+ cells (panels on the second column, arrows). In IPF, SPC and SMARCA4 double-positive cells are visible (panels on the last column, arrows). Scale bars: 50 μm. (B) The ratios of SMARCA4+ in ATII cells (SPC+) in fifteen random fields were calculated. Data are the mean ± SEM of five patients in each group. **p < 0.01.