| Literature DB >> 30258729 |
Yingbiao Zhi1,2,3, Zhonglou Sun2, Ping Sun2, Kai Zhao4, Yangnan Guo5,6, Dejian Zhang5, Baowei Zhang2.
Abstract
Tetraena mongolica Maxim (Zygophyllaceae) is an endangered species endemic to western Inner Mongolia and China, and is currently threatened by habitat loss and human over-exploitation. We explored the genetic background, its genetic diversity, population structure, and demographic history, based on 12 polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci. Our results indicated high genetic diversity in extant populations, but no distinguishable gene cluster corresponding with a specific biogeography. Population demography analysis using a MSVAR indicated a strong, recent population decline approximately 5,455 years ago. These results suggest that the Yellow River and Zhuozi Mountain range may not prevent pollination between populations. Finally, we surmised that the population demography of T. mongolica was likely to have been affected by early mankind activities.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic diversity; Population decline; Population structure; Tetraena mongolica Maxim; Yellow River
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258729 PMCID: PMC6152454 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Map showing the population location of T. mongolica sampled in this study.
Genetic variability observed within populations using nuclear microsatellite loci.
| Population | MNA | AR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SZS | 32 | 13.17 | 6.860 | 0.850 | 0.832 | −0.00163 (−0.03378–0.00409) |
| DS | 64 | 17.67 | 8.284 | 0.836 | 0.881 | 0.06051 (0.02421–0.07440) |
| NH | 51 | 17.67 | 10.499 | 0.812 | 0.880 | 0.08889 (0.04226–0.09998) |
| DALS | 62 | 16.75 | 8.974 | 0.810 | 0.867 | 0.07559 (0.04021–0.09279) |
| WD | 32 | 14.67 | 8.829 | 0.851 | 0.867 | 0.03657 (−0.02664–0.07773) |
| QLS | 32 | 13.92 | 8.532 | 0.873 | 0.854 | −0.00596 (−0.05695–0.00596) |
| WJM | 36 | 15.67 | 10.529 | 0.852 | 0.882 | 0.04891 (−0.01434–0.05576) |
| TST | 30 | 14.08 | 9.397 | 0.840 | 0.877 | 0.06018 (0.02117–0.06018) |
| Total | 339 | 15.45 | 9.382 | 0.840 | 0.868 | 0.06760 (0.05360–0.06888) |
Notes.
number of individuals
mean number of allele per locus
allelic richness
observed and expected heterozygosity
inbreeding coefficient
Genetic diversity of Tetraena mongolica and other shrub based on nuclear microsatellite loci.
| Species | MNA | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 339 | 15.45 | 0.84 | 0.868 | In this study | |
| 338 | 1.6 | 0.199 | 0.345 | ||
| 61 | 2.2 | 0.43 | 0.392 | ||
| 595 | 2.23 | 0.69 | 0.39 | ||
| 151 | – | 0.13–0.37 | 0.2–0.63 | ||
| 321 | – | 0.248-0.523 | 0.420–0.523 | ||
| 344 | 9.3 | 0.48 | 0.52 | ||
| 114 | 19.67 | 0.584 | 0.867 | ||
| 48 | – | 0.258–0.802 | 0.125–0.875 | ||
| 49 | – | 0.125–0.755 | 0.041–0.787 |
Figure 2Bayesian STRUCTURE clustering results of microsatellite variation among T. mongolica populations.
(A) The linear relationship between LnP(D) and K, (B) Dealt K values as a function of K based on five runs and (C) STRUCTURE output from K = 2 to 6.
Pairwise F estimates based on nuclear microsatellite loci.
| Populations | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. SZS | ||||||||
| 2. DS | 0.01599 | |||||||
| 3. HN | 0.00607 | 0.00620 | ||||||
| 4. DALS | 0.01648 | 0.01623 | 0.0076 | |||||
| 5. WD | 0.01795 | 0.00834 | 0.00793 | 0.01522 | ||||
| 6. QLS | 0.04284 | 0.02743 | 0.01740 | 0.02972 | 0.03673 | |||
| 7. WJIM | 0.01580 | 0.00944 | 0.00034 | 0.00769 | 0.01095 | 0.01839 | ||
| 8. TST | 0.02699 | 0.01837 | 0.01373 | 0.01829 | 0.02349 | 0.02138 | 0.00912 |
Notes.
mean P < 0.05.
Figure 3Factorial correspondence analysis performed for T. mongolica based on nuclear microsatellite loci.
Symbols and colors represent individuals from different populations.
Figure 4Population graph for 8 populations of Tetraena mongolica based on nuclear microsatellites data.
The size of the nodes (spheres) represents the genetic variation within populations and edges (lines) connect directly two populations showing significant genetic covariance.
Figure 5Estimated posterior distributions of N0, N1 and T using MSVAR.
N0, current effective population sizes (blue curve); N1, ancestral effective population sizes (red curve); T, time since population change (black curve). All densities are represented in a log10 scale.