| Literature DB >> 30258607 |
Muhaba Seifu1, Yetenayet B Tola2, Ali Mohammed2, Tessema Astatkie3.
Abstract
In Ethiopia, onion is one of the most important vegetables/spices produced as a source of cash income and for flavoring foods. However, postharvest loss during storage remains a major challenge. In this study, the effects of variety (Bombay red, Qellafo and Sweet carolin) and drying temperature (Fresh, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90°C) on physicochemical quality, functional property, and sensory acceptability of dried onion powder were determined. The results indicated that total color change of Bombay red was not affected by temperature, but Qellafo and Sweet carolin varieties showed an increase in color change as drying temperature increases. Bulk density, shrinkage ratio, and water hydration capacity increased with increasing temperature for all three varieties. The degradation of vitamin C, pyruvic acid, and desired sensory attributes increased with increasing oven drying temperature. All in all, Qellafo dried at 70°C for 5 hr was found to be desirable for production of dehydrated onion powder. The findings of this study will allow the identification of the best of the three commonly grown onion varieties in Ethiopia, and the preferred temperature for production of dried onion with minimal negative effect on physicochemical, functional, nutritional, and sensory properties.Entities:
Keywords: drying; postharvest; pungency; storage life; vitamin C
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258607 PMCID: PMC6145276 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
ANOVA p‐values showing the significance of the main and interaction effects of variety and temperature (Temp) on physical and functional (ΔE = total color change, bulk density, shrinkage ratio, water hydration capacity, water activity) response variables. Significant effects that require multiple means comparison are shown in bold
| Source of variation | ΔE | Bulk density | Shrinkage ratio | Water hydration capacity | Water activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | 0.001 |
|
|
| 0.001 |
| Temp | 0.001 |
|
|
| 0.001 |
| Variety × Temp |
| 0.890 | 0.597 | 0.908 |
|
Mean ΔE = total color change, water activity (g/cm3), color, aroma, taste, and overall acceptability obtained from the combinations of variety and temperature (Temp in °C)
| Variety | Temp | ΔE | Water activity | Color | Aroma | Taste | Overall acceptability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bombay red | 0 | NA | 0.964ab | 4.21bc | 4.00b | 4.30ab | 4.30a |
| Bombay red | 50 | 13.9g | 0.327c | 3.90de | 3.61cde | 3.64c | 3.90bc |
| Bombay red | 60 | 17.1g | 0.280de | 3.69ef | 3.48efg | 3.49cde | 3.82cde |
| Bombay red | 70 | 20.3fg | 0.262fgh | 3.49fgh | 3.45efg | 3.28efg | 3.65f |
| Bombay red | 80 | 23.6efg | 0.250hi | 3.28hij | 3.31fgh | 3.07hi | 3.54fgh |
| Bombay red | 90 | 27.3defg | 0.234jk | 3.00j | 3.11hi | 2.80j | 3.37ij |
| Qellafo | 0 | NA | 0.958b | 4.48ab | 4.37a | 4.44a | 4.35a |
| Qellafo | 50 | 32.8cdef | 0.292d | 4.10cd | 3.81bc | 3.55cd | 3.96bc |
| Qellafo | 60 | 34.8cde | 0.277e | 3.88de | 3.74bcd | 3.38defg | 3.84cd |
| Qellafo | 70 | 37.3bcd | 0.270ef | 3.65efg | 3.50def | 3.33efg | 3.68def |
| Qellafo | 80 | 41.3bc | 0.266efg | 3.36ghi | 3.42efg | 3.20gh | 3.61f |
| Qellafo | 90 | 44.5ab | 0.251hi | 3.12ij | 3.10hi | 2.91ij | 3.40hi |
| Sweet carolin | 0 | NA | 0.976a | 4.60a | 3.83bc | 4.42a | 4.04b |
| Sweet carolin | 50 | 35.3cde | 0.317c | 3.64efg | 3.39efg | 4.42a | 3.68ef |
| Sweet carolin | 60 | 39.5bc | 0.259fgh | 3.44fgh | 3.22gh | 4.17b | 3.61f |
| Sweet carolin | 70 | 45.2ab | 0.254gh | 3.40fghi | 3.12hi | 3.41def | 3.57fg |
| Sweet carolin | 80 | 49.9a | 0.239ij | 3.21hij | 2.94i | 3.27fgh | 3.42ghi |
| Sweet carolin | 90 | 51.6a | 0.222k | 2.59k | 2.47j | 2.81j | 3.22j |
NA: Not applicable.
Within each column, means sharing the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level of significance using Tukey's multiple means comparison method.
Mean bulk density, shrinkage ratio, water hydration capacity, total soluble solids (TSS), and titratable acidity (TA) obtained from the three varieties and six temperatures
| Variety | Bulk density | Shrinkage ratio | Water hydration capacity | TSS | TA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bombay red | 0.839a | 41.9ab | 1.81b | 6.59b | 0.284b |
| Qellafo | 0.789b | 40.3b | 2.26a | 6.60b | 0.318a |
| Sweet carolin | 0.823a | 44.2a | 1.35c | 6.93a | 0.260c |
| Temperature | |||||
| 0 | NA | NA | NA | 5.22d | 0.155e |
| 50 | 0.747d | 33.7d | 1.47c | 6.30c | 0.286d |
| 60 | 0.789c | 36.6cd | 1.61bc | 6.84b | 0.299cd |
| 70 | 0.820bc | 40.8c | 1.79b | 7.18ab | 0.313bc |
| 80 | 0.850ab | 46.0b | 2.01a | 7.48a | 0.327ab |
| 90 | 0.878a | 53.5a | 2.15a | 7.23ab | 0.345a |
NA: Not applicable.
Within each response variable and within each factor, means sharing the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level of significance using Tukey's multiple means comparison method.
ANOVA p‐values showing the significance of the main and interaction effects of variety and temperature (Temp) on chemical (TSS = total soluble solids, pH, TA = titratable acidity, VC = vitamin C, pungency, and % moisture) response variables. Significant effects that require multiple means comparison are shown in bold
| Source of variation | TSS | pH | TA | VC | Pungency | % Moisture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety |
| 0.001 |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Temp |
| 0.001 |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Variety × Temp | 0.633 |
| 0.953 |
|
|
|
Mean pH, vitamin C, pungency (pyruvic acid content), and % moisture obtained from the combinations of variety and temperature (Temp)
| Variety | Temp | pH | Vitamin C | Pungency | % Moisture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bombay red | 0 | 5.36a | 4.46b | 10.07b | 83.33b |
| Bombay red | 50 | 4.31c | 1.51cdef | 5.37ghij | 7.77cde |
| Bombay red | 60 | 4.27cd | 1.42cdefgh | 5.15hijk | 6.67cdef |
| Bombay red | 70 | 4.20cde | 1.14efghi | 4.90jk | 6.30def |
| Bombay red | 80 | 4.02fghi | 1.06ghij | 4.67jk | 5.93def |
| Bombay red | 90 | 3.69k | 0.94ij | 4.45k | 5.33ef |
| Qellafo | 0 | 5.04b | 5.03a | 12.16a | 81.67b |
| Qellafo | 50 | 4.16cdef | 1.77c | 6.93d | 6.57cdef |
| Qellafo | 60 | 4.11defg | 1.78c | 6.73de | 6.27def |
| Qellafo | 70 | 3.97ghi | 1.68cd | 6.40def | 5.73def |
| Qellafo | 80 | 3.86ij | 1.52cde | 6.10defg | 5.50ef |
| Qellafo | 90 | 3.76jk | 1.46cdefg | 5.80fghi | 4.93f |
| Sweet carolin | 0 | 5.34a | 4.19b | 9.17c | 90.33a |
| Sweet carolin | 50 | 4.32c | 1.75c | 5.88efgh | 9.00c |
| Sweet carolin | 60 | 4.13defg | 1.34defghi | 5.22hijk | 8.23cd |
| Sweet carolin | 70 | 4.05efgh | 1.11fghi | 4.99ijk | 7.80cde |
| Sweet carolin | 80 | 3.92hij | 1.02hij | 4.82jk | 7.27cdef |
| Sweet carolin | 90 | 3.79jk | 0.68j | 4.45k | 6.63cdef |
Within each column, means sharing the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level of significance using Tukey's multiple means comparison method.
ANOVA p‐values showing the significance of the main and interaction effects of variety and temperature (Temp) on sensory response variables. Significant effects that require multiple means comparison are shown in bold
| Source of variation | Color | Aroma | Taste | Overall acceptability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Temp | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Variety × Temp |
|
|
|
|