Literature DB >> 30258473

The Use of a Nomogram to Visually Interpret a Logistic Regression Prediction Model for Giant Cell Arteritis.

Edsel B Ing1,2, Royce Ing2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the utility of a nomogram for the prediction of giant cell arteritis (GCA).
METHOD: A nomogram was constructed from a multivariable logistic regression prediction model with 10 covariates: age, sex, clinical temporal artery abnormality, new-onset headache, jaw claudication, vision loss, diplopia, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and platelet level.
RESULTS: The magnitude and location of the nomogram scale for each predictor variable graphically illustrates the net effect of each covariate and is especially useful for continuous variables such as age and bloodwork values.
CONCLUSIONS: Nomograms allow integration and synthesis of the relative importance of clinical variables and provide a graphic representation of the odds ratios, p values, and confidence intervals of logistic regression prediction models. Although nomograms and prediction rules cannot substitute for clinical judgment, they help objectify and optimize the individualized risk assessments for patients with suspected GCA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Giant cell arteritis; nomogram; prediction model; temporal artery biopsy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30258473      PMCID: PMC6152514          DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2018.1425728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroophthalmology        ISSN: 0165-8107


  13 in total

1.  Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  W M Grove; D H Zald; B S Lebow; B E Snitz; C Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2000-03

2.  Nomograms and medicine.

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Evaluation for clinical predictors of positive temporal artery biopsy in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Kevin L Rieck; Tanaz A Kermani; Kristine M Thomsen; William S Harmsen; Matthew J Karban; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Baseline clinical predictors of an ultimate giant cell arteritis diagnosis in patients referred to temporal artery biopsy.

Authors:  Chagai Grossman; Iris Barshack; Nira Koren-Morag; Ilan Ben-Zvi; Gil Bornstein
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  A calculator for temporal artery biopsy result prediction in giant cell arteritis suspects.

Authors:  Julio J González-López; Julio González-Moraleja; Gema Rebolleda; Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.487

6.  Quantifying risk of early relapse in patients with first demyelinating events: Prediction in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tim Spelman; Claire Meyniel; Juan Ignacio Rojas; Alessandra Lugaresi; Guillermo Izquierdo; Francois Grand'Maison; Cavit Boz; Raed Alroughani; Eva Havrdova; Dana Horakova; Gerardo Iuliano; Pierre Duquette; Murat Terzi; Pierre Grammond; Raymond Hupperts; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Celia Oreja-Guevara; Eugenio Pucci; Freek Verheul; Marcela Fiol; Vincent Van Pesch; Edgardo Cristiano; Thor Petersen; Fraser Moore; Tomas Kalincik; Vilija Jokubaitis; Maria Trojano; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Effect of binocular variations of Snellen's visual acuity on Titmus stereoacuity.

Authors:  P B Donzis; J A Rappazzo; R M Burde; M Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-06

8.  Use of laboratory markers in deciding whether to perform temporal artery biopsy.

Authors:  Lindsey B De Lott; James F Burke
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  The use of clinical characteristics to predict the results of temporal artery biopsy among patients with suspected giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  S E Gabriel; W M O'Fallon; A A Achkar; J T Lie; G G Hunder
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Sara Valpione; Justin C Moser; Raffaele Parrozzani; Marco Bazzi; Aaron S Mansfield; Simone Mocellin; Jacopo Pigozzo; Edoardo Midena; Svetomir N Markovic; Camillo Aliberti; Luca G Campana; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of the Yield of Temporal Artery Biopsy for Suspected Giant Cell Arteritis.

Authors:  Edsel B Ing; Dan Ni Wang; Abirami Kirubarajan; Etienne Benard-Seguin; Jingyi Ma; James P Farmer; Michel J Belliveau; Galina Sholohov; Nurhan Torun
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2018-06-19

2.  Neural network and logistic regression diagnostic prediction models for giant cell arteritis: development and validation.

Authors:  Edsel B Ing; Neil R Miller; Angeline Nguyen; Wanhua Su; Lulu L C D Bursztyn; Meredith Poole; Vinay Kansal; Andrew Toren; Dana Albreki; Jack G Mouhanna; Alla Muladzanov; Mikaël Bernier; Mark Gans; Dongho Lee; Colten Wendel; Claire Sheldon; Marc Shields; Lorne Bellan; Matthew Lee-Wing; Yasaman Mohadjer; Navdeep Nijhawan; Felix Tyndel; Arun N E Sundaram; Martin W Ten Hove; John J Chen; Amadeo R Rodriguez; Angela Hu; Nader Khalidi; Royce Ing; Samuel W K Wong; Nurhan Torun
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-21

3.  Systematic Review of Privacy-Preserving Distributed Machine Learning From Federated Databases in Health Care.

Authors:  Fadila Zerka; Samir Barakat; Sean Walsh; Marta Bogowicz; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Arthur Jochems; Benjamin Miraglio; David Townend; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-03

4.  Incidence and Predictors of Synchronous Bone Metastasis in Newly Diagnosed Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Real-World Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Lin Qi; Wenchao Zhang; Xiaolei Ren; Ruiling Xu; Chaoqian Liu; Chao Tu; Zhihong Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-24

5.  Prediction of adolescent suicidal ideation after the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide survey of a representative sample of Korea.

Authors:  Haewon Byeon
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.569

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.