| Literature DB >> 30258401 |
Michela Lupo1, Giusy Olivito1,2, Libera Siciliano1,3, Marcella Masciullo4, Marco Molinari5, Mara Cercignani2,6, Marco Bozzali2,6, Maria Leggio1,7.
Abstract
We described the cerebello-cerebral functional connectivity in a subject who developed a manic state after a cerebellar lesion. Whole brain investigation, performed by means of an advanced MRI examination, evidenced an isolated lesion involving the left lobules VI, VIIa (crus I), and IX and the posterior area of the vermis. The cerebello-cerebral functional connectivity analysis detected a pattern of altered connectivity in specific areas of the prefrontal-striatal-thalamic circuits that are typically altered in bipolar subjects during the manic state. Specifically, a pattern of hypo-connectivity was found between the cerebellum and cerebral regions known to be implicated in emotion modulation and social interaction. Conversely, a pattern of hyper-connectivity was found between the cerebellum and posterior cerebral cortical regions that are involved in sensorimotor functions. The present study represents the first evidence that dysregulation of cerebral networks consequent to a cerebellar lesion is at the root of bipolar disorder, at least the manic state, and provides a new framework for interpreting cerebellar modulation in the regulation of mood in specific psychiatric conditions.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; bipolar disorder; cerebellum; mania; mood
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258401 PMCID: PMC6143664 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Comparison between the patient's MRI scans. (A) MRI in May 2015 (10 months after acute event of July 2014). (B) MRI at follow-up in January 2016 (8 months after the initial scan).
Demographic characteristics of MT and the control group.
| MT | 1 | 43 | 18 | F | 105 | 46/100 |
| Cnt | 20 | 52.4 (5.75) | – | F | – | – |
Cnt, Control Group; F, female; IQ, Intelligence Quotient assessed by Wechsler Adult Intelligent Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) (.
Figure 2(A) Multislice axial (z) view of the left DN mask superimposed on the spatially unbiased atlas template of the cerebellum and brainstem (SUIT) (25). L, left; R, right. (B,C) Cerebello-cerebral functional connectivity differences in MT compared to the control group. Clusters of significant hypo-connectivity (B) and hyper-connectivity (C) with cerebellar DN are shown in coronal (y), sagittal (x), and axial slices (z). X, Y, Z in the MNI space. Results considered significant at p < 0.001 uncorrected after FWE correction at the cluster level.
Functional hypo-connectivity results between the DN and cerebral cortex regions.
| 625 | −14 | 34 | 22 | 4.96 | L-Paracingulate cortex |
| −8 | 16 | 28 | 4.62 | L-Cingulate cortex | |
| −30 | 40 | 12 | 4.58 | L-Frontal Pole | |
| 150 | 30 | 56 | 8 | 5.12 | R-Frontal Pole |
| 36 | 50 | 10 | 3.42 | ||
| 32 | 42 | 10 | 3.33 | ||
| 232 | 16 | 10 | 16 | 4.45 | Caudate |
| 147 | −24 | −8 | 60 | 4.33 | L-Superior Frontal Gyrus |
| −18 | −14 | 42 | 3.99 | ||
| −18 | −2 | 52 | 3.88 | ||
MNI coordinate space (x, y, z) and peak Z-score of the peak voxels showing the greatest significant differences in a cluster are reported. Only regions that survived after correction for multiple comparisons (FWE corrected p < 0.05, clusters formed with uncorrected voxels p < 0.001 at cluster level) were considered. NoV, number of voxels; L, left; R, right.
Functional hyper-connectivity results between the DN and cerebral cortex regions.
| 176 | 34 | −76 | 12 | 4.54 | L-Lateral Occipital Cortex |
| 220 | −6 | −82 | 30 | 4.52 | L-Cuneal cortex |
| −14 | −86 | 18 | 4.32 | L-Lateral Occipital cortex | |
| −19 | −92 | 30 | 4.00 | L-Occipital pole | |
| 377 | 16 | −40 | 72 | 4.50 | R-Post-central gyrus |
| 20 | −46 | 56 | 4.22 | R-Superior Parietal lobe | |
| 14 | −24 | 72 | 4.00 | R-Precentral gyrus | |
| 251 | 20 | −76 | 42 | 4.33 | R-Lateral Occipital cortex |
| 22 | −62 | 34 | 3.96 | R-Precuneus | |
| 10 | −82 | 38 | 3.79 | R-Cuneal cortex | |
MNI coordinate space (x, y, z) and peak Z-score of the peak voxels showing the greatest significant differences in a cluster are reported. Only regions that survived after correction for multiple comparisons (FWE corrected p < 0.05, clusters formed with uncorrected voxels p < 0.001 at cluster level) were considered. NoV, number of voxels; L, left; R, right.