| Literature DB >> 30257424 |
Michelina Catauro1, Elisabetta Tranquillo2,3, Alessia Salzillo4, Lucia Capasso5, Michela Illiano6, Luigi Sapio7, Silvio Naviglio8.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: cell proliferation; natural compounds; sol-gel method
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30257424 PMCID: PMC6222366 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Molecular formula of chlorogenic acid (CGA).
Figure 2Representative FT-IR spectra a. CGA; b. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt%; c. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA5wt%; d. SiO2/PEG6wt%; e. SiO2; f. PEG.
Figure 3A graphical representation of the hybrids.
Figure 4SEM micrographs of (A) a representative SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% hybrid (B) EDX analysis of SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% hybrid before exposure to SBF, (C) SiO2/PEG6wt% and (D) a representative SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% hybrid after 7 days in SBF; (E) EDX analysis of SiO2/PEG6wt% hybrid and (F) EDX analysis of SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% hybrid after 7 days in SBF. (G) SiO2/PEG6wt% and (H) a representative SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% hybrid after 14 days in SBF; (I) EDX analysis of SiO2/PEG6wt% hybrid and (L) EDX analysis of SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% hybrid after 14 days in SBF. (M) SiO2/PEG6wt% and (N) a representative SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% hybrid after 21 days in SBF; (O) EDX analysis of SiO2/PEG6wt% hybrid and (P) EDX analysis of SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% hybrid after 21 days in SBF.
Figure 5FT-IR spectra of (A) a. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA5wt% not soaked in SBF; b. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA5wt% c. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% after 7 days of exposure to SBF d. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% not soaked in SBF. (B) a. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA5wt% not soaked in SBF; b. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA5wt% c. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% after 14 days of exposure to SBF d. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% not soaked in SBF. (C) a. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA5wt% not soaked in SBF; b. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA5wt% c. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% after 21 days of exposure to SBF d. SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% not soaked in SBF.
Figure 6A representative XRD of SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% soaked in SBF solution for 21 days.
Figure 7Effects of SiO2/PEG hybrid 0.5 mg/mL, SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA5wt% hybrid 0.5 mg/mL, SiO2/PEG6wt%/CGA10wt% hybrid 0.5 mg/mL, pure CGA 200 µM, and doxorubicin 0.1 µM on the distribution of U2OS cells in cell cycle phases and on cell death. U2OS cells were cultured in presence or not of doxorubicin for 24 h and of all the other indicated compounds for 48 h. Subsequently, cell cycle phases (Panel A), sub-G1 (Panel B) or uptaking PI+ dead cells (Panel C) were evaluated by Flow Cytometry. Quantitative data from three independent experiments indicating the percentage of sub-G1, G1, S, and G2/M cells or the percentage of dead cells are reported. The means and S.D. are shown. * p < 0.05 vs. the control untreated cells (Panel A) or vs. the indicated samples (Panels B and C).
Figure 8Effects of CGA-free SiO2/PEG hybrid 0.5 mg/mL, 5%CGA-containing SiO2/PEG hybrid 0.5 mg/mL, 10%CGA-containing SiO2/PEG hybrid 0.5 mg/mL, pure CGA 200 µM, and doxorubicin 0.1 µM on the distribution of U2OS cells in cell cycle phases and on cell death. U2OS cells were cultured in presence or not of doxorubicin for 24 h and of all the other indicated compounds for 48 h. Subsequently, cell cycle phases (Panel A), sub-G1 (Panel B) or uptaking PI+ dead cells (Panel C) were evaluated by Flow Cytometry. Quantitative data from three independent experiments indicating the percentage of sub-G1, G1, S, and G2/M cells or the percentage of dead cells are reported. The means and S.D. are shown. * p < 0.05 vs. the control untreated cells (Panel A) or vs. the indicated samples (Panels B and C). In (Panel D), 30 μg of cell extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted with antibodies against the indicated proteins. The image is representative of immunoblotting analysis from two different cellular preparations with similar results.
Figure 9Flowchart of the sol-gel procedure used.