Literature DB >> 30257232

Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services.

Uta Schirpke1, Sebastian Candiago2, Lukas Egarter Vigl2, Hieronymus Jäger3, Alice Labadini2, Thomas Marsoner2, Claude Meisch3, Erich Tasser2, Ulrike Tappeiner4.   

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the relationships among ecosystem services (ES) is important for landscape management, decision-making and policy development, but interactions among multiple ES remain under-researched. In particular, earlier studies often did not clearly distinguish between supply, flow and demand. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms in complex socio-ecological systems remain less examined. In this study, we therefore aimed to assess interactions among eight key ES, adopting a multistep approach. For all ES, we mapped ES supply, flow and demand at the municipality level in the Alpine Space area. We applied correlation analysis and cluster analysis in order to analyse the linkages between ES and to identify bundles of ES. We used random forest analysis to explain the distribution of the ES bundles and to identify important drivers based on socio-ecological variables (e.g. land use/cover, climate, topography and population density). Our results demonstrate that trade-offs and synergies varied greatly for supply, flow and demand. We identified five ES bundles, distinguishing hotspots of ES supply and demand. Twelve socio-ecological variables correctly predicted the membership of 81% of the municipalities to the ES bundles. Our results suggest that a limited number of socio-ecological variables can explain the majority of the distribution of ES bundles in the landscape. Considering the spatial relationships between mountain regions and their surrounding lowlands, regional and transnational governance frameworks need to connect areas of multiple ES supply to areas of ES demand, and should account for the different levels and types of ES relationships.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biophysical assessment; European Alps; Socio-ecological systems; Spatial analysis; Synergy; Trade-off

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30257232     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Mapping the functional connectivity of ecosystem services supply across a regional landscape.

Authors:  Rachel D Field; Lael Parrott
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply-Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services-A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed.

Authors:  Hongjuan Zhang; Juan Feng; Zhicheng Zhang; Kang Liu; Xin Gao; Zidong Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Exploring Connections among Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Human Well-Being in a Mountain-Basin System, China.

Authors:  Bojie Wang; Haiping Tang; Qin Zhang; Fengqi Cui
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  A transnational perspective of global and regional ecosystem service flows from and to mountain regions.

Authors:  Uta Schirpke; Ulrike Tappeiner; Erich Tasser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluating Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Dynamics and Ecological Zoning Management in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Feiyan Chen; Ling Li; Jiqiang Niu; Aiwen Lin; Shiyu Chen; Lin Hao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Land use management based on multi-scenario allocation and trade-offs of ecosystem services in Wafangdian County, Liaoning Province, China.

Authors:  Wenzhen Zhao; Zenglin Han; Xiaolu Yan; Jingqiu Zhong
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Assessing Ecological Infrastructure Investments-A Case Study of Water Rights Trading in Lu'an City, Anhui Province, China.

Authors:  Qiuyan Wang; Qingjian Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Revealing Spatial Patterns of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Four Agricultural Landscapes: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China.

Authors:  Shan He; Chenxia Hu; Jianfeng Li; Jieyi Wu; Qian Xu; Lin Lin; Congmou Zhu; Yongjun Li; Mengmeng Zhou; Luyao Zhu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Multiscale Characteristics and Drivers of the Bundles of Ecosystem Service Budgets in the Su-Xi-Chang Region, China.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Qi Fu; Tinghui Wang; Mengfan Gao; Jinhua Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 4.614

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.