| Literature DB >> 30256964 |
Satoshi Fujiyama1, Chigusa Nakahashi-Oda1, Fumie Abe1, Yaqiu Wang1,2, Kazuki Sato1,3, Akira Shibuya1,3.
Abstract
Tissue-resident macrophages in the spleen, including red pulp and white pulp macrophages, marginal zone macrophages (MZMs) and marginal zone metallophilic macrophages (MMMs), are highly heterogeneous as a consequence of adaptation to tissue-specific environments. Each macrophage sub-population in the spleen is usually identified based on the localization, morphology and membrane antigen expression by immunohistochemistry. However, their phenotypical and functional characteristics remain incompletely understood due to the difficulty of identification and isolation by flow cytometry. We used a cocktail of three enzymes (Collagenase D, Dispase I and DNase I), rather than traditional mechanical grinding, for isolation of each sub-population, which resulted in significant improvement of isolation of these macrophage sub-populations, particularly MZMs and MMMs, as determined by CD11bhiF4/80medTim4hi and CD11bhiF4/80medTim4med, respectively. This method should be helpful for molecular and functional characterization of each splenic resident macrophage sub-population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30256964 PMCID: PMC6364618 DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxy064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Immunol ISSN: 0953-8178 Impact factor: 4.823
Fig. 1.Comparison of spleen dissociation by the enzyme cocktail with that by mechanical grinding. (A) Gating strategy of mechanically and enzymatically isolated splenic cells by flow cytometry. Cells were separated into three populations according to CD11b and F4/80 expression: I, CD11bdullF4/80dull; II, CD11bhiF4/80med; III, CD11bmedF4/80hi. A representative profile of flow cytometry analysis is shown. (B) Number and proportion of cells obtained from whole spleen and I–III sub-populations by mechanically and enzymatically isolated spleen macrophages (n = 3). Error bars indicate 1 SD; *P < 0.05. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
Fig. 2.Characterization of macrophage sub-populations isolated by the enzyme cocktail. (A) Spleen cells were stained with monoclonal antibodies against CD64, MerTK, Tim4, Ly6C, CD11c, MHC class II, CD169 and SIGNR1; each sub-population of macrophages gated according to the strategy in Fig. 1 was analyzed for their expression. Red histograms indicate staining by the antibodies, and filled histograms indicate staining by the isotype control. (B) Each sub-population of macrophage was sorted from the spleen of mice (n = 5) and analyzed for relative gene expression to whole spleen cells by quantitative PCR.
Fig. 3.Developmental and functional analyses of macrophage sub-populations. (A, B) Splenic cells from wild-type and Cd19−/− mice (A) and CD169-DTR mice injected with DT or PBS (B) were isolated by the enzyme cocktail and sub-population II of macrophages gated according to the strategy in Fig. 1 was analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) Apoptotic thymocytes were labeled with pHrodo and intravenously injected into mice. Splenic cells were isolated by enzyme digestion 2 h after injection and analyzed for pHrodo signals indicated by red histograms in each sub-population of macrophages by flow cytometry. Experiments were independently performed twice. Representative flow cytometry profiles are shown.