| Literature DB >> 30256877 |
L Pilloni1, P Bianco1, C Manieli1, G Senes1, P Coni1, L Atzori2, N Aste2, G Faa1.
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a very common malignant skin tumor that rarely metastatizes, but is often locally aggressive. Several factors, like large size (more than 3 cm), exposure to ultraviolet rays, histological variants, level of infiltration and perineural or perivascular invasion, are associated with a more aggressive clinical course. These morphological features seem to be more determinant in mideface localized BCC, which frequently show a significantly higher recurrence rate. An immunohistochemical profile, characterized by reactivity of tumor cells for p53, Ki67 and alpha-SMA has been associated with a more aggressive behaviour in large BCCs. The aim of this study was to verify if also little (<3 cm) basal cell carcinomas can express immunohistochemical markers typical for an aggressive behaviour.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 30256877 PMCID: PMC3167285 DOI: 10.4081/ejh.2009.e14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Histochem ISSN: 1121-760X Impact factor: 3.188
Clinical (age, sex, location, size), histological (histotype, depth infiltration in millimetre, ulceration, essudation and level of infiltration according anatomical skin layers URD upper reticular dermis; DRD deep reticular dermis ) and immunohistochemical data of 31 cases of BBC; essudation Mild=+; Moderate=++;Severe=+++; immunohistochemical score: 0= 0–6%; 1= 6–25%; 2= 25–50%; 3=51–75%;4=76–100%.
| 1 | 61 | M | Extr | Keratotic | 10×8 | 1 | No | +++ | URD | +++ | + | + | - |
| 2 | 61 | M | Face | Adenoid | 10×9 | 4 | No | + | URD | +++ | - | - | - |
| 3 | 64 | M | Extr | Sup mult | 11×13 | 0.8 | No | + | DRD | + | - | - | - |
| 4 | 73 | M | Face | Nodular | 10×8 | 2 | Yes | + | DRD | +++ | + | ++ | +++ |
| 5 | 84 | M | Face | Nodular | 9×12 | 2 | Yes | + | DRD | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | 84 | M | Face | Adenoid | 5 | 0.8 | No | + | URD | +++ | - | - | - |
| 7 | 84 | M | Extr | Nodular | 13×10 | 3 | No | + | DRD | +++ | + | + | - |
| 8 | 52 | F | Face | Nodular | 4 | 0.8 | No | + | URD | + | + | + | - |
| 9 | 76 | F | Face | Adenoid | 10×4 | 4 | No | + | DRD | +++ | - | ++ | - |
| 10 | 77 | F | Face | Morph | 8×6 | 1 | Yes | +++ | DRD | +++ | - | - | - |
| 11 | 86 | M | Face | Morph | 8 | 1 | Yes | + | DRD | +++ | - | + | + |
| 12 | 63 | F | Face | Adenoid | 4 | 1 | No | + | URD | ++ | + | + | + |
| 13 | 76 | F | Face | Nodular | 7 | 1.5 | No | + | DRD | +++ | + | ++ | - |
| 14 | 84 | M | Face | Nodular | 11 | 4 | Yes | +++ | DRD | + | - | - | + |
| 15 | 63 | F | Face | Keratotic | 10×6 | 1.8 | No | ++ | DRD | - | + | ++ | - |
| 16 | 68 | F | Trunk | Sup mult | 10×6 | 0.7 | No | ++ | URD | + | + | - | - |
| 17 | 67 | M | Face | Sup mult | 12×6 | 0.4 | No | + | URD | + | - | + | - |
| 18 | 67 | M | Extr | Sup mult | 4×3 | 0.3 | No | + | URD | + | +++ | + | - |
| 19 | 32 | F | Extr | Sup mult | 1×3 | 0.4 | No | + | URD | + | + | + | - |
| 20 | 45 | M | Trunk | Nodular | 7×5 | 2 | Yes | +++ | URD | + | + | + | - |
| 21 | 62 | M | Trunk | Sup mult | 11×7 | 0.9 | No | ++ | URD | - | ++ | - | ++ |
| 22 | 65 | M | Trunk | Adenoid | 7×6 | 1.5 | No | + | URD | +++ | + | + | - |
| 23 | 72 | M | Trunk | Nodular | 12×6 | 1 | No | + | URD | +++ | - | + | + |
| 24 | 86 | F | Face | Keratotic | 20×11 | 3.1 | No | ++ | DRD | + | + | + | - |
| 25 | 85 | M | Face | Nodular | 0.5 | 1.3 | No | ++ | DRD | ++ | + | + | - |
| 26 | 74 | F | Extr | Nodular | 4×4 | 0.9 | No | + | URD | - | - | + | - |
| 27 | 71 | M | Face | Nodular | 6×12 | 1.7 | No | + | DRD | - | - | + | - |
| 28 | 64 | F | Trunk | Sup mult | 1.3×1.5 | 0.4 | No | ++ | URD | +++ | - | - | - |
| 29 | 78 | F | Face | Nodular | 4×3 | 1.5 | No | ++ | DRD | ++ | + | - | +++ |
| 30 | 80 | M | Face | Keratotic | 4×4 | 1.6 | Yes | + | DRD | - | - | + | +++ |
Comparison of our 8 α-SMA positive cases with negative cases.
| 8 α-SMA Positive cases | 75% | 12% | 12% | 1.6 | 50% | 63% | 75% | 50% | 63% |
| 23 α-SMA Negative cases | 56% | 13% | 4% | 1.4 | 13% | 48% | 78% | 43% | 65% |