Jui-Hua Tsai1, Ann O Scheimann2, Shawn E McCandless3, Theresa V Strong4, John F P Bridges5. 1. a Health Policy and Management Department, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA. 2. b Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition , Johns Hopkins Hospital , Baltimore , MD , USA. 3. c Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado , Aurora , CO , USA. 4. d Foundation for Prader-Willi Research (FPWR) , Walnut , CA , USA. 5. e Department of Biomedical Informatics , The Ohio State University College of Medicine , Columbus , OH , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare genetic disorder associated with varying degrees of hyperphagia, obesity, intellectual disability, and anxiety across the affected individuals' lifetimes. This study quantified caregiver priorities for potential treatment endpoints to identify unmet needs in PWS. METHODS: The authors partnered with the International Consortium to Advance Clinical Trials for PWS (PWS-CTC) and a diverse stakeholder advisory board to develop a best-worst scaling instrument. Seven relevant endpoints were assessed using a balanced incomplete block design. Caregivers were asked to determine the most and least important of a sub-set of four endpoints in each task. Caregivers were recruited nationally though patient registries, email lists, and social media. Best-worst score was calculated to determine caregiver priorities; ranging from 0 (least important) to 10 (most important). A novel kernel-smoothing approach was used to analyze caregiver endpoint priority variations with relation to age of the PWS individual. RESULTS: In total, 457 caregivers participated in the study. Respondents were mostly parents (97%), females (83%), and Caucasian (87%) who cared for a PWS individual ranging from 4-54 years. Caregivers value treatments addressing hyperphagia (score = 7.08, SE = 0.17) and anxiety (score = 6.35, SE = 0.16) as most important. Key variations in priorities were observed across age, including treatments targeting anxiety, temper outbursts, and intellectual functions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that caregivers prioritize hyperphagia and, using a novel method, demonstrates that this is independent of the age of the person with PWS. This is even the case for parents of young children who have yet to experience hyperphagia, indicating that these results are not subject to a hypothetical bias.
OBJECTIVES:Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare genetic disorder associated with varying degrees of hyperphagia, obesity, intellectual disability, and anxiety across the affected individuals' lifetimes. This study quantified caregiver priorities for potential treatment endpoints to identify unmet needs in PWS. METHODS: The authors partnered with the International Consortium to Advance Clinical Trials for PWS (PWS-CTC) and a diverse stakeholder advisory board to develop a best-worst scaling instrument. Seven relevant endpoints were assessed using a balanced incomplete block design. Caregivers were asked to determine the most and least important of a sub-set of four endpoints in each task. Caregivers were recruited nationally though patient registries, email lists, and social media. Best-worst score was calculated to determine caregiver priorities; ranging from 0 (least important) to 10 (most important). A novel kernel-smoothing approach was used to analyze caregiver endpoint priority variations with relation to age of the PWS individual. RESULTS: In total, 457 caregivers participated in the study. Respondents were mostly parents (97%), females (83%), and Caucasian (87%) who cared for a PWS individual ranging from 4-54 years. Caregivers value treatments addressing hyperphagia (score = 7.08, SE = 0.17) and anxiety (score = 6.35, SE = 0.16) as most important. Key variations in priorities were observed across age, including treatments targeting anxiety, temper outbursts, and intellectual functions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that caregivers prioritize hyperphagia and, using a novel method, demonstrates that this is independent of the age of the person with PWS. This is even the case for parents of young children who have yet to experience hyperphagia, indicating that these results are not subject to a hypothetical bias.
Authors: Jessica Mackay; Gillian M Nixon; Antony R Lafferty; Geoff Ambler; Nitin Kapur; Philip B Bergman; Cara Schofield; Chris Seton; Andrew Tai; Elaine Tham; Komal Vora; Patricia Crock; Charles Verge; Yassmin Musthaffa; Greg Blecher; Daan Caudri; Helen Leonard; Peter Jacoby; Andrew Wilson; Catherine S Choong; Jenny Downs Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2021-09-08
Authors: Ilene L Hollin; Jonathan Paskett; Anne L R Schuster; Norah L Crossnohere; John F P Bridges Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 4.558
Authors: Emily G Miller; Amanda L Woodward; Grace Flinchum; Jennifer L Young; Holly K Tabor; Meghan C Halley Journal: Genet Med Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 8.864
Authors: Sarika U Peters; Cary Fu; Eric D Marsh; Tim A Benke; Bernard Suter; Steve A Skinner; David N Lieberman; Shannon Standridge; Mary Jones; Arthur Beisang; Timothy Feyma; Peter Heydeman; Robin Ryther; Daniel G Glaze; Alan K Percy; Jeffrey L Neul Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 2.802