Literature DB >> 30256569

The Effect of Health Behavior Modification Program for Liver Fluke Prevention among the Risk Group in Rural Communities, Thailand

Benchapan Panithanang1,2, Wirangrong Srithongklang, Pontip Kompor, Prasit Pengsaa, Natthawut Kaewpitoon, Parichart Wakkhuwattapong, Soraya J Kaewpitoon.   

Abstract

This quasi-experimental research aimed to study the effect of health behavior modification program in relation to knowledge, self-efficacy, expectation, and practice for liver fluke prevention among the risk group from Bueng Samrong sub-district, Kaeng Sanam Nang district, Nakhon Ratchasima province, Northeast Thailand. The total of 66 participants was assigned to experimental and comparison group, 33 participants in each group, 12-weeks intervene period. The experimental group was received health behavioral modification programs based on health education, self-efficacy, motivation, social support and networking. Pre-and-post-tests were measured using predesigned questionnaires. The comparative analysis was analyzed by paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test at the 0.05 level of significance. The results revealed that the experimental group had significantly greater knowledge, self-efficacy, expectation, and practice for liver fluke prevention than those in the comparison group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, this was a successful health education program for liver fluke avoidance. Participants were gained the correct knowledge and had the higher self-efficacy, expectation, and practice regrading liver fluke prevention. Therefore, it may useful for further behavior modification in the other epidemic areas. Creative Commons Attribution License

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health behavior modification program; liver fluke; rural communities; Thailand

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30256569      PMCID: PMC6249471          DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.9.2673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


Introduction

Liver fluke infection caused by Opisthorchis viverrini is the major causative factor inducing cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in Thailand, Lao PDR, Vietnam and Cambodia (IARC, 1994; Kaewpitoon et al., 2008; Sripa et al., 2010; Sitthithaworn et al., 2012; Kaewpitoon et al., 2015; Edwards et al., 2018). The highest incidence of CCA worldwide leading to about 20,000 deaths every year in Northeast Thailand (Sripa et al., 2010). Liver fluke infection is acquired by ingestion of raw or undercooked cyprinoid’s fish harboring infective metacercariae stage (Kaewkes 2003). The infection is endemic among human populations in northeast and north Thailand, where the most common raw fish is frequently consumed (Preuksaraj et al., 1982; Kaewpitoon et al., 2007). Presently, a nationwide survey in Thailand has been reported by Wongsaroj et al (2014) and found that the prevalent was 5.1% where has the highest of prevalent was found in the northeast (9.2%) and north region (5.2%). Behavior modification programs regarding prevention and control of liver fluke infection are essential for decreasing the disease. Numerous control programs have been implemented in liver fluke endemic areas particularly the highest provinces prevalent (Sripa et al., 2015), but despite initial decreases in liver fluke following the introduction of such programs, rates of CCA remain high in northeast and north. This liver fluke therefore continues to place a severe burden on the health services and need to urgently problem solving. Previously studied indicated that knowledge, attitude, and practice related to liver fluke infection in rural communities (Kaewpitoon et al., 2007). Improvement of high knowledge, perception, and practice regarding diseases, depend on varieties of health education. Boom (1971), Becker and Maiman (1975), and Janz and Becker (1984) indicated that the success behavior modification should be used many methods and continuous intervention. In addition, self-efficacy and social support influencing behavior modification, common used in the health education program (House and Kahn, 1985). According a serious data on liver fluke in the epidemic areas, therefore, this study aimed to study the effect of health behavior modification program for liver fluke prevention among the risk group in Bueng Samrong sub-district, Kaeng Sanam Nang district, Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand. The health behavior modification program may useful and effective toward liver fluke prevention and control in the epidemic communities.

Materials and Methods

Two-group pre-posttest design quasi-experimental study was approved by the human research ethics committees of Suranaree University of Technology, 2017. The study was performed during June to September 2017 in Bueng Samrong sub-district, Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand where has been reported as the epidemic areas (Kaewpitoon et al., 2012). Bueng Samrong sub-district is located in Kang Sanam Nang district, Nokhon Ratchasima province, northeast Thailand. It is 395 kilometers from Bangkok (the capital of Thailand) and has an area of around 43 square kilometers. The sub-district is divided into 9 villages with about 5,484 populations (Figure 1). 66 participants from 5,484 populations who had verbal screened as the high risk score and stool examined by the formalin ether concentration technique, assigned to 2 groups; 33 participants were experimental group and received health behavior modification programs (HBMP), meanwhile 33 participants were designed as a comparison group that without those program. HBMP was applied based on health education, self-efficacy, motivation, and social support concepts regarding liver fluke prevention and control, according program has been shown in table 1 and figure 2-4. The study was intervened for 12 weeks. Pre-and-post-tests waere measured with questionnaires. A predesigned questionnaire containing 5 parts included (1) demographic characteristics; gender, age, marital status, education, occupation, income, past histories related to liver fluke infection, (2) knowledge, (3) self-efficacy, (4) expectation, and (5) practice regarding liver fluke prevention and control. The questionnaires were completed a content validity by 3 experts regarding liver fluke knowledge, and then tryout in closely neighbor communities for reliability test. The questionnaires has reliability value according to knowledge part with Kuder-Richardson-20 (KR-20 = 0.68), self-efficacy, expectation and practice with Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient = 0.70, 0.73 and 0.75. Each questionnaire was analyzed and interpreted for their parts. Evaluation of knowledge was calculated and analyzed according to Bloom (1971). Knowledge with 15 questions, answer correct=1, incorrect=0, and interpreted to high level; ≥80% points, moderate level; 60%-79.5% points, 0-59.5% points; low level. Self-efficacy, expectation and practice level were calculated and analyzed according to Best (1977). Self-efficacy and expectation with 9 questions/each part; 3 choice (agree, not sure, dis-agree): positive question=3,2,1, negative question=1,2,3, and interpreted to high level; 21.6-27 points, moderate level; 16.2-21.5 points, and low level; 0-16.1 points. Evaluation of practical level with 9 question; 3 choice (frequently, sometimes, never): positive question=3,2,1, negative question=1,2,3, and interpreted to high level; 21.6-27 points, moderate level; 16.2-21.5 points, and low level; 0-16.1 points. Descriptive and analytical statistical data were analyzed with SPSS software. Percentage, mean, standard deviation, paired t- test, independent t- test, the statistical significance level of .05 were employed for data analyzes.
Figure 1

Study Areas was Conducted in Bueng Sarong Sub-District, Kang Sanam Nang District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Northeast Thailand.

Table 1

Health Modification Program among the 66 Participants in Each Experimental and Comparison Groups

Time periodsActivitiesOutcome
Week 1Community participatory action with Building relationshipActivities and interested leaders
Week 2Screening risk group for liver fluke infection by using verbal screening testRisk group for experimental and comparison groups
Week 3Collecting data before intervention by health village volunteers using predesigned questionnairesScore level of knowledge, self-efficacy, expectation and practice
Week 4Stool collection and examinationInfected patients and treatments
Week 5Health education based station learning through one day activities learning including Station 1. Demonstration of morphology and life cycle of liver fluke; Opisthorchis viverrini using liver fluke adult and egg, Bithynia, cyprinoid fish museum and poster Station 2. Demonstration of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) museum Station 3. Health education regarding risk factors, symptoms, pathogenesis, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of liver fluke by facilitators using PowerPoint, poster, brochures Station 4. Health education regarding food safety and environmental sanitation by facilitators using PowerPoint, poster, brochures Station 5. Case based learning by using VDO clip story of CCA patients Station 6. Group discussion for sharing experience about liver fluke and CCA patientsImprovement of knowledge, self-efficacy, expectation and practice regarding liver fluke prevention and control
Week 6Home visiting experimental group by health village volunteers and local health officers using PDRCSUT handbookMotivation, self-efficacy and social support regarding liver fluke prevention and control
Week 7Walking campaign by students, health village volunteers and local health officers using poster, brochures, and giving the fluke free house flagMotivation, self-efficacy and social support regarding liver fluke prevention and control
Week 8Home visiting experimental group by health village volunteers and local health officersMotivation, self-efficacy and social support regarding liver fluke prevention and control
Week 9Health education regarding liver fluke by health village volunteers and local health officers using village broadcastImprovement of knowledge, and practice regarding liver fluke prevention and control
Week 10Home visiting experimental group by health village volunteers, local health officers, and researchers. Meeting and building fluke free village networkFluke free village network for sustainable liver fluke prevention and control
Week 11Collecting data after intervention by health village volunteers using predesigned questionnaires, stool collection and examinationScore level of knowledge, self-efficacy, expectation and practice, and re-infected patients
Week 12Meeting, reflecting, and return data to communities and individualized personAfter action review and their sharing the experience
Figure 2

Health Behavior Modification Programs were Intervened for Experimental Group in Bueng Sarong Sub-District, Kang Sanam Nang District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Northeast Thailand. This activities were included the health education based station learning through one day activities learning including Station 1-6.

Study Areas was Conducted in Bueng Sarong Sub-District, Kang Sanam Nang District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Northeast Thailand. Health Modification Program among the 66 Participants in Each Experimental and Comparison Groups Health Behavior Modification Programs were Intervened for Experimental Group in Bueng Sarong Sub-District, Kang Sanam Nang District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Northeast Thailand. This activities were included the health education based station learning through one day activities learning including Station 1-6. Health Behavior Modification Programs Were Intervened for Experimental Group in Bueng Sarong Sub-district, Kang Sanam Nang District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Northeast Thailand. This activities have done for motivated and social supported the participants to liver fluke prevention and control, included the walking campaign by students, health village volunteers and local health officers using poster, brochures, and giving the fluke free house flag. Health Behavior Modification Programs were Intervened for Experimental Group in Bueng Sarong sub-District, Kang Sanam Nang District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Northeast Thailand. This activities have done for motivated, response to self-efficacy and social supported the participants to liver fluke prevention and control, included home visiting by health village volunteers, local health officers, and researchers, meeting and building fluke free village network, stool collection and examination.

Results

The majorities of participants were female (63.64%), age between 50-59 years old (42.42%), married (75.76%), primary school (71.21%), agriculture (66.67%), and income 1,000-5,000 Baht (42.42%) (Table 2). Of 7 participants were O. viverrini egg positives who were 4 experiemntal and 3 comparison members. They had administered for treatment with praziquantel after examination and then follow up for curative treatment. None of infected person was examined after intervention in the experimental group but one was O. viverrini egg positive in the comparison group. Of 8 participants had a past history with liver fluke infection and praziquantel used who were 3 and 5 participants in the experimental and comparison groups. The majorities of participants had histories with raw cyprinoid fish consumption (92.42%), included 31 and 30 participants in the experimental and comparison groups. The frequencies of raw cyprinoid fish consumption, they frequently consumed raw dished fish 1 time/year (60.61%). The cyprinoid fish species were often took for the under cooked include Barbonymus gonionotus (62.12%), Esomus metallicus (57.58%), and Henicorhynchus siamensis (46.97%), respectively (Table 3).
Table 2

Demographic Characteristics Among 66 Participants in Experimental and Comparison Groups

Demographic dataExperimental groupComparison group
(n=33)(n=33)
No.%No.%
Gender
 Female2472.731854.55
 Male927.271545.45
Age (year)
 30 – 3926.06721.21
 40 – 49927.27515.15
 50 – 591545.451339.39
 60 – 6939.09721.21
 70 – 7913.0313.03
 80 – 8939.0900
Mean, S.D.54.70, 12.5251.12, 9.88
 Min - Max34, 8732, 70
Education
 Primary school2163.642678.79
 Junior secondary school824.24618.18
 High school26.0600
 Uneducated26.0613.03
Marital status
 Married2472.732678.79
 Divorced/widowed/separated927.27618.18
 Single0013.03
Occupation
 Agriculture2369.72163.64
 Employee618.18927.27
 Housewives26.0626.06
 Trader13.0313.03
 Government officers13.0300
Family income (Thai Baht/month)
 < 1,00039.091545.45
 1,000 – 5,0001133.331751.52
 6,000 – 10,0001133.3300
 10,001 – 15,00039.0913.03
 15,001 – 20,00013.0300
 > 20,000412.1200
Table 3

Past Histories Regarding Liver Flue Disease among 66 Participants in Experimental and Comparison Groups

Past historiesExperimental groupComparison group
(n=33)(n=33)
No.%No.%
Past history with liver fluke infection
 No3090.912884.85
 Yes39.09515.15
Past history with praziquantel used
 No3090.912884.85
 Yes39.09515.15
Raw cyprinoid fish consumption
 Yes3193.943090.91
 No26.0639.09
Frequencies of raw cyprinoid fish
Never26.0639.09
 1 time/week13.0313.03
 4 times/week13.0313.03
 2 times/month515.1539.09
 1 time/year2163.642060.61
 4 times/year39.09515.15
Cyprinoid fish species
Esomus metallicus (Pla Siew Khao)31100750
Barbonymus gonionotus (Pla Ta Pien Khao)2890.321392.85
Henicorhynchus siamensis (Pla Khao Soi)2270.96964.28
Puntius brevis (Pla Ta Pien Sai)1135.48214.28
Hampala macrolepidota (Pla Kra Soob Keed)17.14321.42
Hampala dispar (Pla Kra Soob Jood)17.14321.42
Osteochilus vittatus (Pla Soi Nok Khao)17.1417.14
Demographic Characteristics Among 66 Participants in Experimental and Comparison Groups Past Histories Regarding Liver Flue Disease among 66 Participants in Experimental and Comparison Groups The results reveal that after the intervention, the experimental group had the mean scores of knowledge (mean difference=3.48, t=4.23, 95%CI=- 0.67, -0.23 p-value<0.001) regarding liver fluke prevention and control, higher more than before the intervention with a statistical significantly. In addition, the experimental group had the mean scores of self-efficacy (mean difference=0.21, t=2.93, 95%CI=- 0.35, -0.06 p-value<0.05) to liver fluke prevention and control, higher more than before the intervention with a statistical significantly. Meanwhile, the expectation (mean difference=0.12, t=2.1, 95%CI=- 0.23, -0.00 p-value<0.05), and practice (mean difference=0.31, t=3.73, 95%CI=-0.46, -0.13 p-value<0.001) to liver fluke prevention and control, higher more than before the intervention with a statistical significantly. The compared mean scores for knowledge, self-efficacy, expectation of response efficacy, and practice regarding liver fluke, in the experimental group are shown in table 4.
Table 4

Compared Mean Score for Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Expectation of Response Efficacy, and Practice Regrading Liver Fluke, within Experimental Group (n=33)

CategoriesBefore ExperimentAfter ExperimentMean DifferenceT-test95%CIp-value
MeanSDMeanSD
Knowledge15.942.7119.420.613.484.23-0.67, -0.23<0.001
Self-efficacy2.610.492.820.390.212.93-0.35, -0.06<0.05
Expectation2.720.452.840.360.122.1-0.23, -0.00<0.05
Practice2.210.412.520.510.313.73-0.46, -0.13<0.001
Compared Mean Score for Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Expectation of Response Efficacy, and Practice Regrading Liver Fluke, within Experimental Group (n=33) The results also found that after the intervention, the experimental group had the mean scores of knowledge (mean difference=3.63, t=12.76, 95%CI=3.05.38, 4.21 p-value<0.001) regarding liver fluke prevention and control, higher more than the comparison group with a statistical significantly. Furthermore, the experimental group had the mean scores of self-efficacy (mean difference=0.21, t=2.93, 95% CI=- 0.35, -0.06 p-value<0.05) to liver fluke prevention and control, higher more than the comparison group with a statistical significantly. Moreover, the expectation (mean difference=0.23, t=2.26, 95% CI=0.02, 0.46 p-value<0.05), and practice (mean difference=0.28, t=2.05, 95% CI=0.00, 0.54 p-value<0.05) to liver fluke prevention and control, higher more than the comparison group with a statistical significantly. The compared mean scores for knowledge, self-efficacy, expectation of response efficacy, and practice regarding liver fluke, in the experimental and comparison group are shown in Table 5.
Table 5

Compared Mean Score for Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Expectation of Response Efficacy, and Practice Regrading Liver Fluke, between Experimental and Comparison Groups

CategoriesExperimental group (n=33)Comparison group (n=33)Mean DifferenceT-test95%CIp-value
MeanSDMeanSD
Knowledge
 Before experiment15.942.7115.061.740.881.41-0.38, 2.14>0.05
 After experiment19.420.6115.791.723.6312.763.05, 4.21<0.001
Self-efficacy
 Before experiment2.610.492.540.510.070.27-0.19, 0.25>0.05
 After experiment2.820.392.570.510.252.10.00, 0.47<0.05
Expectation
 Before experiment2.720.452.630.480.090.46-0.20, 0.32>0.05
 After experiment2.840.362.610.490.232.260.02, 0.46<0.05
Practice
 Before experiment2.210.412.20.480.011.15-0.41, 0.11>0.05
 After experiment2.520.512.240.430.282.050.00, 0.54<0.05
Compared Mean Score for Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Expectation of Response Efficacy, and Practice Regrading Liver Fluke, between Experimental and Comparison Groups

Discussion

Numerous control programs have been implemented in liver fluke endemic areas. Development of a community-based approach to liver fluke control has been recommended. Toward integrated liver fluke control in northeast Thailand: the Lawa project has been shown to be the best model (Sripa et al., 2015). Therefore we used that model to solve the problem in our study areas particularly community participatory action by health volunteers, local health officers, local governors, and village leaders using healht behavior modification program based on health education, self-efficacy, motivation and social support concepts. Our study reveals that 7 participants were O. viverrini egg positive who were 4 experiemntal and 3 comparison members. In addition, verbal screening tests showed that 8 participants had a past histories with liver fluke infection and praziquantel used. The majorities of participants had histories with raw cyprinoid fish consumption. The frequencies of raw cyprinoid fish consumption, they frequently consumed raw dished fish 1 time/year. The cyprinoid fish species were often took for the under cooked include B. gonionotus, E. metallicus, and H. siamensis, respectively. In this study confirmed that some villagers in Bueng Samrong subs-district, Nakhon Ratchasima province, are still have a problem with liver fluke infection. Development of a health behavior modification program based approach to liver fluke control is need required. Here we described the quasi-experimental study that conducted in the epidemic areas where have been reported the liver fluke infections. The results reveal that after the intervention, the experimental group had the mean scores of knowledge and practice regarding liver fluke prevention and control, higher more than before the intervention with a statistical significantly. This result is similar to that Boom (1971) suggested the success of behavioral modification should be composed varieties activities. Here, we facilitated them with health education based station learning through one day activities learning including Station 1: demonstration of morphology and life cycle of liver fluke using liver fluke adult and egg, Bithynia, cyprinoid fish museum and poster, Station 2: demonstration of CCA museum, Station 3: health education regarding risk factors, symptoms, pathogenesis, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of liver fluke by facilitators using PowerPoint, poster, brochures, Station 4: health education regarding food safety and environmental sanitation by facilitators using PowerPoint, poster, brochures, Station 5: case based learning by using VDO clip story of CCA patients, and Station 6: group discussion for sharing experience about liver fluke and CCA patients. Therefore, experimental group had a high score of knowledge and practice regarding liver fluke infection. This result is similarly to other studies mainly Kompor et al., (2016) reporting that the effectiveness of health intervention in the population at risk for liver fluke infection and CCA in Meuang Yang district, Nakhon Ratchasima province, northeastern Thailand. Participants were completed health intervention comprising 4 stations; 1, VDO clip of moving adult worm of liver fluke; 2, poster of life cycle of liver fluke; 3, microscopy with adult and egg liver fluke; and 4, brochure with the knowledge of liver fluke containing infection, signs, symptoms, related disease, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and control. Knowledge, attitude, and practice, changed between before and after time points with statistical significance. The results indicate that the present health intervention program was effective and easy to understand, with low cost and taking only a short time. In addition, the experimental group had the mean scores of self-efficacy to liver fluke prevention and control, higher more than before the intervention with a statistical significantly. The expectation, and practice to liver fluke prevention and control, higher more than before the intervention with a statistical significantly. This continuous good self-efficacy, expectation, and practice are dependent on motivation and social support that influencing behavior modification, this is similarly to Becker and Maiman (1975), Janz and Becker (1984), and House and Kahn (1985). We also previously reporting the effectiveness of health education program based on self-efficacy and social support in different areas of Kang Sanam Nang district, Nakhon Ratchasima province (Kaewpitoon et al., 2016b) and Tha Tum district, Surin province, Thailand (Kaewpitoon et al., 2016a). Those results showed a successful for liver fluke avoidance. However, recent study has some point different mainly health behavior modification program is contained Week 6: Home visiting experimental group by health village volunteers and local health officers using PDRCSUT handbook, Week 7: Walking campaign by students, health village volunteers and local health officers using poster, brochures, and giving the fluke free house flag, Week 8: Home visiting experimental group by health village volunteers and local health officers, Week 9: Health education regarding liver fluke by health village volunteers and local health officers using village broadcast, Week 10: Home visiting experimental group by health village volunteers, local health officers, and researchers, meeting and building fluke free village network, Week 11: Collecting data after intervention by health village volunteers using predesigned questionnaires, stool collection and examination, Week 12: meeting, reflecting, and return data to communities and individualized person. Those activities were important factors leading to the maintenance of good behaviors and effecting theirs improve perception, response to self-efficacy, motivation and practice regarding liver fluke prevention and control. This was a successful health education program for liver fluke avoidance. Participants were gained the correct knowledge and had the higher self-efficacy, expectation, and practice regarding liver fluke prevention. Therefore, it may useful for further behavior modification in the other epidemic areas.
  15 in total

1.  Knowledge, attitude and practice related to liver fluke infection in northeast Thailand.

Authors:  Natthawut Kaewpitoon; Soraya J Kaewpitoon; Prasit Pengsaa; Chutigan Pilasri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Development of a Health Education Modification Program Regarding Liver Flukes and Cholangiocarcinoma in High Risk Areas of Nakhon Ratchasima Province Using Self-Efficacy and Motivation Theory.

Authors:  Soraya J Kaewpitoon; Ratana Rujirakul; Parichart Wakkuwattapong; Fuangfa Benjaoran; Jun Norkaew; Jirawoot Kujapun; Sukanya Ponphimai; Wasugree Chavenkun; Porntip Kompor; Natnapa Padchasuwan; Natthawut Kaewpitoon
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Food-borne trematodiases in Southeast Asia epidemiology, pathology, clinical manifestation and control.

Authors:  Banchob Sripa; Sasithorn Kaewkes; Pewpan M Intapan; Wanchai Maleewong; Paul J Brindley
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.870

4.  Population-Based Intervention for Liver Fluke Prevention and Control in Meuang Yang District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand.

Authors:  Pontip Kompor; Rattikarn Muang Karn; Jun Norkaew; Jirawoot Kujapun; Mali Photipim; Sukanya Ponphimai; Wasugree Chavengkun; Somkiat Phong Paew; Soraya Kaewpitoon; Ratana Rujirakul; Parichart Wakhuwathapong; Tanida Phatisena; Thawatchai Eaksanti; Apinya Joosiri; Poowadol Polsripradistdist; Natnapa Padchasuwan; Natthawut Kaewpitoon
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Review and Current Status of Opisthorchis viverrini Infection at the Community Level in Thailand.

Authors:  Natthawut Kaewpitoon; Nusorn Kootanavanichpong; Ponthip Kompor; Wasugree Chavenkun; Jirawoot Kujapun; Jun Norkaew; Sukanya Ponphimai; Likit Matrakool; Taweesak Tongtawee; Sukij Panpimanmas; Ratana Rujirakul; Natnapa Padchasuwan; Poowadol Pholsripradit; Thawatchai Eksanti; Tanida Phatisena; Ryan A Loyd; Soraya J Kaewpitoon
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2015

Review 6.  Infection with liver flukes (Opisthorchis viverrini, Opisthorchis felineus and Clonorchis sinensis).

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  1994

7.  The Carcinogenic Liver Fluke Opisthorchis viverrini among Rural Community People in Northeast Thailand: a Cross- Sectional Descriptive Study using Multistage Sampling Technique.

Authors:  Soraya J Kaewpitoon; Natthawut Kaewpitoon; Ratana Rujirakul; Naporn Ueng-Arporn; Likit Matrakool; Taweesak Tongtawee
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2015

8.  Prevalence of Opisthorchis viverrini infection in Nakhon Ratchasima province, Northeast Thailand.

Authors:  Soraya J Kaewpitoon; Ratana Rujirakul; Natthawut Kaewpitoon
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

Review 9.  Taxonomy and biology of liver flukes.

Authors:  Sasithorn Kaewkes
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.112

Review 10.  The Health Belief Model: a decade later.

Authors:  N K Janz; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1984
View more
  2 in total

1.  Cholangiocarcinoma protective factors in Greater Mekong Subregion: Critical issues for joint planning to sustainably solve regional public health problems.

Authors:  Nopparat Songserm; Somkiattiyos Woradet; Waratip Kankarn; Kanjanar Pintakham; Phouthong Vanhnivongkham; Nguyen Thi To Uyen; Nguyen Cong Cuu; Le Ngoc Cua; Banchob Sripa; Akhtar Ali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  OVCCA Web Application as Supplementary Material to Facilitate Health Literacy Regarding Carcinogenic Human Liver Fluke: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Thailand.

Authors:  Oranard Wattanawong; Tiwakron Prachaiboon; Thirayu Meererksom; Nathkapach Kaewpitoon Rattanapitoon; Schawanya Kaewpitoon Rattanapitoon; Pannee Banchonhattakit; Sarawut Boonsuk; Thongroo Kophachon
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-09-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.