Julian D Ford 1,2 , Joseph Spinazzola 3 , Bessel van der Kolk 4 , Damion J Grasso 2 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Developmental trauma disorder (DTD) is an integrative syndrome for assessing the biopsychosocial sequelae of early life traumatization and attachment disruption. The psychometrics of a DTD Semi-Structured Interview (DTD-SI) and the validity and structure of the DTD construct were tested. METHODS: The DTD-SI was administered by research clinicians at 5 sites between September 2011 and August 2013 to a convenience sample of 236 children ages 7-17 years (50% female, 47% black or Latino/Hispanic, 91% with trauma histories) and/or a parent, recruited in pediatric or mental health services. Validity data were obtained from structured interviews for traumatic stressor and attachment disruption history (Traumatic Events Screening Instrument), DSM-IV disorders (Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Present/Lifetime Version), and potential alternative DSM-5 disorders; parent ratings on the Child Behavior Checklist; and child self-report on measures of emotion dysregulation and quality of life. RESULTS: Statistical analyses confirmed (a) the DTD-SI's item-level temporal and interrater reliability, informativeness, and absence (with 1 exception) of demographic bias and (b) DTD construct factor structure, unidimensionality, and convergent and discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: The DTD-SI yielded reliable, structurally meaningful, and valid item- and criterion-level data for the proposed DTD syndrome. Further clinical and scientific investigation of the clinical utility of DTD as a childhood psychiatric syndrome and diagnosis is warranted. © Copyright 2018 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Developmental trauma disorder (DTD ) is an integrative syndrome for assessing the biopsychosocial sequelae of early life traumatization and attachment disruption. The psychometrics of a DTD Semi-Structured Interview (DTD-SI ) and the validity and structure of the DTD construct were tested. METHODS: The DTD-SI was administered by research clinicians at 5 sites between September 2011 and August 2013 to a convenience sample of 236 children ages 7-17 years (50% female, 47% black or Latino/Hispanic, 91% with trauma histories) and/or a parent, recruited in pediatric or mental health services. Validity data were obtained from structured interviews for traumatic stressor and attachment disruption history (Traumatic Events Screening Instrument), DSM-IV disorders (Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia , Present/Lifetime Version), and potential alternative DSM-5 disorders; parent ratings on the Child Behavior Checklist; and child self-report on measures of emotion dysregulation and quality of life. RESULTS: Statistical analyses confirmed (a) the DTD-SI's item-level temporal and interrater reliability, informativeness, and absence (with 1 exception) of demographic bias and (b) DTD construct factor structure, unidimensionality, and convergent and discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: The DTD-SI yielded reliable, structurally meaningful, and valid item- and criterion-level data for the proposed DTD syndrome . Further clinical and scientific investigation of the clinical utility of DTD as a childhood psychiatric syndrome and diagnosis is warranted. © Copyright 2018 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Entities: Disease
Species
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2018
PMID: 30256549 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.17m11675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Psychiatry ISSN: 0160-6689 Impact factor: 4.384