Literature DB >> 30256494

Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests.

Daniel Magnabosco Marra1,2,3, Susan E Trumbore1, Niro Higuchi2, Gabriel H P M Ribeiro2, Robinson I Negrón-Juárez4, Frederic Holzwarth3, Sami W Rifai5, Joaquim Dos Santos2, Adriano J N Lima2, Valdely F Kinupp6, Jeffrey Q Chambers4,7, Christian Wirth3,8,9.   

Abstract

Amazon forests account for ~25% of global land biomass and tropical tree species. In these forests, windthrows (i.e., snapped and uprooted trees) are a major natural disturbance, but the rates and mechanisms of recovery are not known. To provide a predictive framework for understanding the effects of windthrows on forest structure and functional composition (DBH ≥10 cm), we quantified biomass recovery as a function of windthrow severity (i.e., fraction of windthrow tree mortality on Landsat pixels, ranging from 0%-70%) and time since disturbance for terra-firme forests in the Central Amazon. Forest monitoring allowed insights into the processes and mechanisms driving the net biomass change (i.e., increment minus loss) and shifts in functional composition. Windthrown areas recovering for between 4-27 years had biomass stocks as low as 65.2-91.7 Mg/ha or 23%-38% of those in nearby undisturbed forests (~255.6 Mg/ha, all sites). Even low windthrow severities (4%-20% tree mortality) caused decadal changes in biomass stocks and structure. While rates of biomass increment in recovering vegetation were nearly double (6.3 ± 1.4 Mg ha- 1  year- 1 ) those of undisturbed forests (~3.7 Mg ha- 1  year- 1 ), biomass loss due to post-windthrow mortality was high (up to -7.5 ± 8.7 Mg ha- 1  year- 1 , 8.5 years since disturbance) and unpredictable. Consequently, recovery to 90% of "pre-disturbance" biomass takes up to 40 years. Resprouting trees contributed little to biomass recovery. Instead, light-demanding, low-density genera (e.g., Cecropia, Inga, Miconia, Pourouma, Tachigali, and Tapirira) were favored, resulting in substantial post-windthrow species turnover. Shifts in functional composition demonstrate that windthrows affect the resilience of live tree biomass by favoring soft-wooded species with shorter life spans that are more vulnerable to future disturbances. As the time required for forests to recover biomass is likely similar to the recurrence interval of windthrows triggering succession, windthrows have the potential to control landscape biomass/carbon dynamics and functional composition in Amazon forests. ©2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity; biomass/carbon dynamics and resilience; forest blowdowns; natural disturbances; recovery dynamics; tree mortality; tropical forest ecosystems

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30256494     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  4 in total

1.  An architectural understanding of natural sway frequencies in trees.

Authors:  T Jackson; A Shenkin; J Moore; A Bunce; T van Emmerik; B Kane; D Burcham; K James; J Selker; K Calders; N Origo; M Disney; A Burt; P Wilkes; P Raumonen; J Gonzalez de Tanago Menaca; A Lau; M Herold; R C Goodman; T Fourcaud; Y Malhi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Effects of fire disturbance on species and functional compositions vary with tree sizes in a tropical dry forest.

Authors:  Kanokporn Kaewsong; Chia-Hao Chang-Yang; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Ekaphan Kraichak; Jie Yang; Zhenhua Sun; Caicai Zhang; Wenfei Li; Luxiang Lin; I-Fang Sun
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Important role of forest disturbances in the global biomass turnover and carbon sinks.

Authors:  Thomas A M Pugh; Almut Arneth; Markus Kautz; Benjamin Poulter; Benjamin Smith
Journal:  Nat Geosci       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 16.908

4.  Diversity, distribution and dynamics of large trees across an old-growth lowland tropical rain forest landscape.

Authors:  David B Clark; Antonio Ferraz; Deborah A Clark; James R Kellner; Susan G Letcher; Sassan Saatchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.