BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has been the preferred technique for procuring tissue at endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures for the past 25 years. To overcome some of the limitations of FNA cytology, fine-needle biopsy (FNB) has been recently developed to yield histological tissue. Main objective was to compare the diagnostic yield of FNB compared to FNA for both onsite and offsite specimen assessment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center to evaluate the outcomes of FNA and FNB over a 4-year period. EUS-guided tissue sampling was carried out using 22- or 25-G FNA needles from 2014 to 2015, and 22-G FNB needle was used from 2016 to 2017. RESULTS: Of 3020 patients undergoing EUS-guided sampling of solid mass lesions (pancreatic masses 71.3%, other lesions 28.7%), FNA was carried out in 68.9% and FNB in 31.1%. Median number of passes required for diagnostic adequacy on rapid onsite evaluation was significantly lower for FNB compared to FNA (1 [IQR: 1-2] vs 2 [IQR 1-3], P < 0.001). Diagnostic yield on cell block was also significantly superior with FNB compared to FNA (92.3 vs 71.1%, P < 0.001). The superior performance of FNB over FNA was observed for both pancreatic (P < 0.001) and non-pancreatic lesions (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Given these promising findings, in the future, EUS-guided FNB will likely be the preferred technique for sampling of solid mass lesions.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has been the preferred technique for procuring tissue at endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures for the past 25 years. To overcome some of the limitations of FNA cytology, fine-needle biopsy (FNB) has been recently developed to yield histological tissue. Main objective was to compare the diagnostic yield of FNB compared to FNA for both onsite and offsite specimen assessment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center to evaluate the outcomes of FNA and FNB over a 4-year period. EUS-guided tissue sampling was carried out using 22- or 25-G FNA needles from 2014 to 2015, and 22-G FNB needle was used from 2016 to 2017. RESULTS: Of 3020 patients undergoing EUS-guided sampling of solid mass lesions (pancreatic masses 71.3%, other lesions 28.7%), FNA was carried out in 68.9% and FNB in 31.1%. Median number of passes required for diagnostic adequacy on rapid onsite evaluation was significantly lower for FNB compared to FNA (1 [IQR: 1-2] vs 2 [IQR 1-3], P < 0.001). Diagnostic yield on cell block was also significantly superior with FNB compared to FNA (92.3 vs 71.1%, P < 0.001). The superior performance of FNB over FNA was observed for both pancreatic (P < 0.001) and non-pancreatic lesions (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Given these promising findings, in the future, EUS-guided FNB will likely be the preferred technique for sampling of solid mass lesions.
Authors: Diogo T H de Moura; Thomas R McCarty; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Igor B Ribeiro; Victor K Flumignan; Fedaa Najdawai; Marvin Ryou; Linda S Lee; Christopher C Thompson Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Diogo T H de Moura; Thomas R McCarty; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Igor B Ribeiro; Kelly E Hathorn; Antonio Coutinho Madruga-Neto; Linda S Lee; Christopher C Thompson Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2020-05-25
Authors: Christoph F Dietrich; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Barbara Braden; Sean Burmeister; Silvia Carrara; Xinwu Cui; Milena Di Leo; Yi Dong; Pietro Fusaroli; Uwe Gottschalk; Andrew J Healey; Michael Hocke; Stephan Hollerbach; Julio Iglesias Garcia; André Ignee; Christian Jürgensen; Michel Kahaleh; Masayuki Kitano; Rastislav Kunda; Alberto Larghi; Kathleen Möller; Bertrand Napoleon; Kofi W Oppong; Maria Chiara Petrone; Adrian Saftoiu; Rajesh Puri; Anand V Sahai; Erwin Santo; Malay Sharma; Assaad Soweid; Siyu Sun; Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Peter Vilmann; Hans Seifert; Christian Jenssen Journal: Endosc Ultrasound Date: 2019 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.628
Authors: Samuel Han; Furqan Bhullar; Omar Alaber; Ayesha Kamal; Puanani Hopson; Kavin Kanthasamy; Sarah Coughlin; Livia Archibugi; Nikhil Thiruvengadam; Christopher Moreau; David Jin; Pedram Paragomi; Francisco Valverde-López; Sajan Nagpal; Cemal Yazici; Georgios Papchristou; Peter J Lee; Venkata Akshintala Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2021-05-27