Literature DB >> 30256117

Identifying High-Priority Proteins Across the Human Diseasome Using Semantic Similarity.

Edward Lau1, Vidya Venkatraman2, Cody T Thomas3, Joseph C Wu1, Jennifer E Van Eyk2, Maggie P Y Lam3.   

Abstract

Identifying the genes and proteins associated with a biological process or disease is a central goal of the biomedical research enterprise. However, relatively few systematic approaches are available that provide objective evaluation of the genes or proteins known to be important to a research topic, and hence researchers often rely on subjective evaluation of domain experts and laborious manual literature review. Computational bibliometric analysis, in conjunction with text mining and data curation, attempts to automate this process and return prioritized proteins in any given research topic. We describe here a method to identify and rank protein-topic relationships by calculating the semantic similarity between a protein and a query term in the biomerical literature while adjusting for the impact and immediacy of associated research articles. We term the calculated metric the weighted copublication distance (WCD) and show that it compares well to related approaches in predicting benchmark protein lists in multiple biological processes. We used WCD to extract prioritized "popular proteins" across multiple cell types, subanatomical regions, and standardized vocabularies containing over 20 000 human disease terms. The collection of protein-disease associations across the resulting human "diseasome" supports data analytical workflows to perform reverse protein-to-disease queries and functional annotation of experimental protein lists. We envision that the described improvement to the popular proteins strategy will be useful for annotating protein lists and guiding method development efforts as well as generating new hypotheses on understudied disease proteins using bibliometric information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bibliometric analysis; diseasome; high-priority proteins; normalized copublication distance; popular proteins; semantic similarity; targeted proteomics; weighted copublication distance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30256117      PMCID: PMC6606054          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  5 in total

1.  Working the literature harder: what can text mining and bibliometric analysis reveal?

Authors:  Yu Han; Sara A Wennersten; Maggie P Y Lam
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Transcriptome features of striated muscle aging and predictability of protein level changes.

Authors:  Yu Han; Lauren Z Li; Nikhitha L Kastury; Cody T Thomas; Maggie P Y Lam; Edward Lau
Journal:  Mol Omics       Date:  2021-10-11

3.  OmixLitMiner: A Bioinformatics Tool for Prioritizing Biological Leads from 'Omics Data Using Literature Retrieval and Data Mining.

Authors:  Pascal Steffen; Jemma Wu; Shubhang Hariharan; Hannah Voss; Vijay Raghunath; Mark P Molloy; Hartmut Schlüter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Proteomic signatures of acute oxidative stress response to paraquat in the mouse heart.

Authors:  Vishantie Dostal; Silas D Wood; Cody T Thomas; Yu Han; Edward Lau; Maggie P Y Lam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  GPCRs Are Optimal Regulators of Complex Biological Systems and Orchestrate the Interface between Health and Disease.

Authors:  Hanne Leysen; Deborah Walter; Bregje Christiaenssen; Romi Vandoren; İrem Harputluoğlu; Nore Van Loon; Stuart Maudsley
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.