| Literature DB >> 30256067 |
F M Abu-Duhier1, Jamsheed Javid, M A Sughayer, Rashid Mir, Tariq Albalawi, M Shahid Alauddin.
Abstract
Dysregulation in the miRNA-21 expression has been previously observed in a number of malignancies and not only in the tumor cell itself but also in the body fluids of the cancer patients. The present study aimed to find out the clinical significance of cell-free circulating miRNA-21 as an efficient non-invasive biomarker for the screening of lung cancer patients. The present case-control study included plasma samples from 80 lung cancer patients and 80 healthy controls. Magnetic bead technology was used for efficient miRNA isolation and advanced TaqMan miRNA assays were used for the quantification of miRNA-21 level in the plasma of the lung cancer patients and healthy individuals.The overall mean relative expression level of plasma miRNA-21 among lung cancer patients (2.32±1.7) was higher when compared to healthy individuals (0.715 ± 0.48) and it showed a significant difference of p<0.0001. The area under ROC curve was 0.8913 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8394 to 0.9431, p< 0.0001] and the sensitivity and specificity were both 80.0% when the cut-off value was 1.207. In conclusion, plasma miRNA-21 can be efficiently extracted by the magnetic bead technology and quantified by the advanced TaqMan miRNA assay. Plasma miRNA-21 showed a high ability to distinguish between lung cancer patients and healthy individuals, therefore can be used as an efficient non-invasive biomarker for the screening of Lung cancer patients. Creative Commons Attribution LicenseEntities:
Keywords: Lung cancer; biomarker; plasma miRNA-21
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30256067 PMCID: PMC6249464 DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.9.2607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Distribution of Selected Characteristics among Lung Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls
| Variable | Lung Cancer patients (%) | Healthy Controls (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Study population | ||
| Total No. | 80 | 80 |
| Tabuk | 20 | 20 |
| Jordan | 60 | 60 |
| Gender | ||
| Males | 58 (72.5) | 53 (66.25) |
| Females | 22 (27.5) | 27 (33.75) |
| Smoking status | ||
| Non-Smokers | 26 (32.5) | 80 (100.0 %) |
| Smokers | 54 (67.5) | 0 (0.0 %) |
| Age at diagnosis (Years) | ||
| Mean +SD age (Y) | 57.6 + 11.49 | 26.8+ 4.01 |
| (range, 28-87 Years) | (range, 21- 40 Years) | |
| Histological type | ||
| ADC | 60 (75.0) | |
| SCC | 20 (25.0) | |
| TNM Stage | ||
| I | 2 (2.5) | |
| II | 7 (8.75) | |
| III | 26 (32.5) | |
| IV | 46 (57.5) | |
| Distant metastases | ||
| No | 35 (43.75) | |
| Yes | 45 (56.25) | |
| Histological grade | ||
| Grade 1 | 2 (2.5) | |
| Grade 2 | 33 (41.25) | |
| Grade 3 | 23 (28.75) | |
ADC- adenocarcinoma,
SCC-squamous cell carcinoma
Figure 1The Relative Expression Level of Plasma miRNA-21 in Lung Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls.
Relative Quantification of Plasma miRNA-21 level (Mean ±SD) among the Study Population
| Variables | Plasma miRNA-21 level (Mean ±SD) | 95% Confidence interval | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Population | |||
| Lung cancer patients | 2.32 ± 1.7 | 1.95 to 2.69 | <0.0001 |
| Healthy controls | 0.715 ± 0.48 | 0.60 to 0.82 | |
| Lung cancer patients (n=80) | |||
| Gender | |||
| Male | 2.15 ±1.49 | 1.75 to 2.55 | 0.153 |
| Female | 2.75 ±1.98 | 1.86 to 3.63 | |
| TNM Stage | |||
| I | 3.14 ±0.71 | -3.21 to 9.49 | 0.829 |
| II | 2.32 ±1.55 | 0.89 to 3.76 | |
| III | 2.13 ±1.77 | 0.35 to 1.41 | |
| IV | 2.40 ±1.66 | 1.89 to 2.89 | |
| Distant Metastases | |||
| M0 | 2.21 ±1.68 | 1.65 to 2.80 | 0.667 |
| M1 | 2.4 ±1.66 | 1.89 to 2.89 | |
| Histological type | |||
| ADC | 2.16 ±1.5 | 1.77 to 2.56 | 0.159 |
| SCC | 2.77 ±1.98 | 1.84 to 3.69 | |
| Histological Grades | |||
| Grade 1 | 1.15 ±1.26 | -10.2 to 12.5 | 0.333 |
| Grade 2 | 2.53 ±1.72 | 1.92 to 3.14 | |
| Grade 3 | 2.09 ±1.55 | 1.54 to 2.64 | |
| Smoking status | |||
| Smoker | 2.71 ±1.92 | 1.93 to 3.48 | 0.147 |
| Non-Smoker | 2.13 ±1.49 | 1.72 to 2.54 |
Figure 2ROC Curve for Diagnostic Value of Plasma miRNA-21 in Lung Cancer Patient Screening