Literature DB >> 30256067

Clinical Significance of Circulatory miRNA-21 as an Efficient Non-Invasive Biomarker for the Screening of Lung Cancer Patients

F M Abu-Duhier1, Jamsheed Javid, M A Sughayer, Rashid Mir, Tariq Albalawi, M Shahid Alauddin.   

Abstract

Dysregulation in the miRNA-21 expression has been previously observed in a number of malignancies and not only in the tumor cell itself but also in the body fluids of the cancer patients. The present study aimed to find out the clinical significance of cell-free circulating miRNA-21 as an efficient non-invasive biomarker for the screening of lung cancer patients. The present case-control study included plasma samples from 80 lung cancer patients and 80 healthy controls. Magnetic bead technology was used for efficient miRNA isolation and advanced TaqMan miRNA assays were used for the quantification of miRNA-21 level in the plasma of the lung cancer patients and healthy individuals.The overall mean relative expression level of plasma miRNA-21 among lung cancer patients (2.32±1.7) was higher when compared to healthy individuals (0.715 ± 0.48) and it showed a significant difference of p<0.0001. The area under ROC curve was 0.8913 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8394 to 0.9431, p< 0.0001] and the sensitivity and specificity were both 80.0% when the cut-off value was 1.207. In conclusion, plasma miRNA-21 can be efficiently extracted by the magnetic bead technology and quantified by the advanced TaqMan miRNA assay. Plasma miRNA-21 showed a high ability to distinguish between lung cancer patients and healthy individuals, therefore can be used as an efficient non-invasive biomarker for the screening of Lung cancer patients. Creative Commons Attribution License

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer; biomarker; plasma miRNA-21

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30256067      PMCID: PMC6249464          DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.9.2607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


Introduction

Lung cancer is one the most common malignancies and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite the advanced imaging and cytology-based screening strategies employed for early detection of tumors, the majority of the lung cancer cases are diagnosed in late stages which are a determining factor for the high mortality rate for the disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of an effective screening test for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Many promising non-invasive biomarkers have been observed; however, their clinical use is still limited due to the paucity of validating studies currently available. One of the prime focuses of the present cancer research is to find out the cell-free circulatory miRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of solid tumors. MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNA molecules (~22 nucleotides) encoded by specific microRNA genes, which function in negative regulation of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by binding to the respective mRNA target transcripts at 3′ untranslated region (Castro et al., 2017; Yong et al., 2016). Dysregulation in the expression of various miRNAs has been observed in a number of malignancies including lung cancer (Palanichamy et al., 2014). The dysregulation of the miRNAs has been observed not only in the tumor cell itself but also in the body fluids of the cancer patients, such as plasma, serum, pleural effusion and urine etc. (Zhao et al., 2015;Cappellesso et al., 2016; Kao et al., 2016). A well know miRNA, the miRNA-21 have been observed to play a pivotal role in the tumor development by regulating various molecular mechanisms such as cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, and anti-apoptosis etc. (Tao et al., 2015; Yin Hsun et al., 2016). Various studies have observed the dysregulation of miRNA-21 in the circulation of lung cancer patients (Yang et al., 2015; Wei et al., 2015), however, in reality, the clinical significance of circulatory miRNA-21 as a biomarker in Lung cancer is still at its preliminary level. The goal of the current study was to find out the clinical significance of cell-free circulating miRNA-21 as an efficient non-invasive biomarker for the screening of Lung cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

The present study was approved by the Research Ethics committee at the University of Tabuk, Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of King Hussein Cancer Center, Jordan. The study included two study groups:1) Histopathologically confirmed Lung cancer patients (n=80) and healthy controls (n=80). Study subjects were collected from King Fahd specialist hospital, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, and King Hussein Cancer Center, Jordan. Blood samples were withdrawn from each participant after obtaining the written informed consent.

Plasma microRNA isolation

Blood samples up to 5 ml were collected in EDTA vials and plasma was isolated by centrifugation at 2,500 rpm for 15 minutes and stored at –80°C until use. MicroRNAs from plasma were extracted by MagMAX™ magnetic-bead technology using MagMAX™ mirVana™ RNA Isolation Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA). Protocol provided by the manufacturer was followed for the miRNA isolation and all the solutions provided in the kit were prepared as per the given instructions. In a processing plate provided in the kit, 100 μL of plasma sample was mixed with 50μL of Protienase K digestion mix and incubated at 65°C for 30 minutes. Followed by addition of 100 μL of lysis binding mix and 20 μL of RNA binding beads to the sample. After proper mixing 270 μL of isopropanol was added and the processing plate was placed on the magnetic stand-96 for 5 minutes or until clear solution was observed. The supernatant was carefully aspirated and discard without disturbing the RNA binding beads. Processing plate was removed from the magnetic stand-96 and 150 μL of wash solution-1 provided in the kit was added to the sample. Processing plate was again placed on the magnetic stand-96 for 1 minute or until the solution is clear and the supernatant was carefully aspirated and discarded without disturbing the RNA binding beads. The above wash step was repeated using 150 μL of wash solution-2 provided in the kit. After drying the RNA binding beads, 50 μL of TURBO DNase™ solution was added to the sample. Sample was properly mixed and 50 μL of rebinding buffer and 100μL of isopropanol was added. The processing plate was placed on the magnetic stand-96 for 5 minutes or until clear solution was observed. The supernatant was carefully aspirated and discarded without disturbing the RNA binding beads. Processing plate was removed from the magnetic stand-96 and 150 μL of wash solution-2 was added to the sample. Processing plate was again placed on the magnetic stand-96 for 1 minute or until the solution is clear and the supernatant was carefully aspirated and discarded without disturbing the RNA binding beads. After drying the RNA binding beads, 50 μL of pre-heated elution buffer was added to the sample and incubated at 65°C for 5 minutes. The processing plate was placed on the magnetic stand-96 for 3 minutes or until the solution is clear. The supernatant containing the miRNA was carefully transfered to the elution plate and stored at –20°C until further process. Synthetic cel-miR-39-3p miRNA (Spike-In Control; QIAGEN, USA) of 1.6 x 108 copies/μL concentration was added to each plasma sample during the extraction process as an exogenous control to normalize and monitor the extraction efficiency.

Plasma miRNA quantification

TaqMan MicroRNA reverse transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) was used to convert the plasma miRNA to cDNA by RT-PCR. The cDNA synthesis process included four important reaction steps; poly (A) tailing reaction, adapter ligation reaction, reverse transcription (RT) reaction and finally the miR-Amp reaction. All of the above steps were performed according to the protocol provided by the reverse transcription Kit manufacturer (Applied Biosystems, USA). The expression level of the miRNA-21 in plasma was quantified using quantitative real-time PCR analysis in an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system. TaqMan-advanced miRNA assay (Applied Biosystems, USA) specific for miRNA-21 and TaqMan® Fast Advanced Master Mix was used in the real-time PCR. Real-time PCR reactions were performed in a 20 μL reaction mixture containing 10μL TaqMan® Fast Advanced Master Mix (2X), 1.0 μL Taqman® Advanced miRNA-21 Assay (20x), 5.0 μL diluted (1:10) RT cDNA template and remaining 4μL of RNase-free water. The cycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 20s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 3s and 60°C for 30s. For each sample, the quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed in triplicates. We observed miRNA-16 as the most stable endogenous reference in the plasma of our study population of lung cancer patients and healthy controls. The expression data were then analyzed by relative quantification (2–ΔΔCT) method using miRNA-16 as an endogenous control and synthetic cel-miR-39-3p as an endogenous control for normalization. Plasma miRNA-21 concentration was quantified as described by Ioanna S. et al., 2013; first by normalizing the expression levels of both target miRNA-21 and the endogenous control miRNA-16 with respect to the exogenous control cel-miR-39, and then the relative quantification (RQ) was estimated.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by using the SPSS statistical software version -21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and GraphPad Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The difference in plasma miRNA-21 levels between groups was estimated by using Mann-Whitney U test. ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnosis value, including AUC, cutoff point, sensitivity, and specificity. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics of the study population

A summary of the baseline characteristics of the lung cancer patients and healthy controls are presented in Table 1. Present study included 80 Lung cancer patients and 80 healthy controls. Among the patient group, 60 were adenocarcinoma and 20 were squamous cell carcinoma. Lung cancer patients were diagnosed in different stages (Stage I = 2.5%, Stage II= 8.75%, Stage III=32.5% and Stage IV= 57.5%) with varying histological grades (Grade 1=2.5%, Grade 2=41.25% and Grade 3=28.75%). Majority of the lung cancer patients were males (72.5%) and the overall mean age for the patient group was 57.6 years in the range of 28 to 87 years.
Table 1

Distribution of Selected Characteristics among Lung Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls

VariableLung Cancer patients (%)Healthy Controls (%)
Study population
 Total No.8080
 Tabuk2020
 Jordan6060
Gender
 Males58 (72.5)53 (66.25)
 Females22 (27.5)27 (33.75)
Smoking status
 Non-Smokers26 (32.5)80 (100.0 %)
 Smokers54 (67.5)0 (0.0 %)
Age at diagnosis (Years)
 Mean +SD age (Y)57.6 + 11.4926.8+ 4.01
(range, 28-87 Years)(range, 21- 40 Years)
Histological type
 ADC*60 (75.0)
 SCC**20 (25.0)
TNM Stage
 I2 (2.5)
 II7 (8.75)
 III26 (32.5)
 IV46 (57.5)
Distant metastases
 No35 (43.75)
 Yes45 (56.25)
Histological grade
 Grade 12 (2.5)
 Grade 233 (41.25)
 Grade 323 (28.75)

ADC- adenocarcinoma,

SCC-squamous cell carcinoma

Distribution of Selected Characteristics among Lung Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls ADC- adenocarcinoma, SCC-squamous cell carcinoma

Plasma miRNA-21 level among Lung cancer patients and healthy controls

Real-time relative quantification analysis showed that the overall mean relative expression level of plasma miRNA-21 among lung cancer patients (2.32 ± 1.7) was significantly higher compared to that of the healthy individuals (0.715 ± 0.48) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

The Relative Expression Level of Plasma miRNA-21 in Lung Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls.

The Relative Expression Level of Plasma miRNA-21 in Lung Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls.

Plasma miRNA-21 level with respect to the clinical parameters of Lung cancer patients

In comparison to the healthy controls, we observed that there was a higher detectable level of plasma miRNA-21 even among the patients with early stage (I and II) of lung cancer disease. A higher level of plasma miRNA-21 was also observed among the patients with distant organ metastasis in comparison to the lung cancer patients with local tumor invasion, however, the difference was not observed to be statistically significant. Squamous cell carcinoma patients showed the slightly higher level of plasma miRNA-21 than the patients with adenocarcinoma. In addition, while comparing the plasma miRNA-21 in different histological grades, moderately and poorly differentiated (Grade 2 and 3) cell type reflected higher plasma miRNA-21 level than grade 1 differentiation; but the difference doesn’t reach to the value of statistical significance. Smoking is one of the major risk factors for lung cancer, however in the present study we didn’t observed any significant difference (p=0.147) in the level of miRNA-21 among smoker (2.71 ±1.92) and non-smoker (2.13 ±1.49) lung cancer patients (Table 2).
Table 2

Relative Quantification of Plasma miRNA-21 level (Mean ±SD) among the Study Population

VariablesPlasma miRNA-21 level (Mean ±SD)95% Confidence intervalp value
Study Population
 Lung cancer patients2.32 ± 1.71.95 to 2.69<0.0001
 Healthy controls0.715 ± 0.480.60 to 0.82
Lung cancer patients (n=80)
Gender
 Male2.15 ±1.491.75 to 2.550.153
 Female2.75 ±1.981.86 to 3.63
TNM Stage
 I3.14 ±0.71-3.21 to 9.490.829
 II2.32 ±1.550.89 to 3.76
 III2.13 ±1.770.35 to 1.41
 IV2.40 ±1.661.89 to 2.89
Distant Metastases
 M02.21 ±1.681.65 to 2.800.667
 M12.4 ±1.661.89 to 2.89
Histological type
 ADC2.16 ±1.51.77 to 2.560.159
 SCC2.77 ±1.981.84 to 3.69
Histological Grades
 Grade 11.15 ±1.26-10.2 to 12.50.333
 Grade 22.53 ±1.721.92 to 3.14
 Grade 32.09 ±1.551.54 to 2.64
Smoking status
 Smoker2.71 ±1.921.93 to 3.480.147
 Non-Smoker2.13 ±1.491.72 to 2.54
Relative Quantification of Plasma miRNA-21 level (Mean ±SD) among the Study Population

Diagnostic value of plasma miRNA-21 in lung cancer patient screening

In order to determine the diagnostic value of plasma miRNA-21 for the screening of lung cancer patients, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was created by GraphPad Prism (version 5.0) software. We observed that the area under curve (AUC) was 0.8913 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8394 to 0.9431, p< 0.0001] and the sensitivity and specificity were both 80.0%, when the cut-off value was 1.207, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

ROC Curve for Diagnostic Value of Plasma miRNA-21 in Lung Cancer Patient Screening

ROC Curve for Diagnostic Value of Plasma miRNA-21 in Lung Cancer Patient Screening

Discussion

Currently available advanced imaging and cytology-based screening strategies are very helpful for the detection of lung tumors; however, the majority of the lung cancer cases are still diagnosed at late stages. The recent findings of the potential role of miRNAs in various biological pathways and their presence in blood circulation have given a positive hope towards the identification of some efficient circulatory biomarkers for the diagnosis of lung cancer. miRNA-21 is one of the most extensively studied microRNAs, encoded by MIR21 gene in humans, located on chromosome 17q23.2. miRNA-21 has been observed to regulate many cell functions by targeting multiple genes associated with cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, and anti-apoptosis etc. (Tao et al., 2015; Yin Hsun et al., 2015). miRNA-21 has been observed to be the most commonly upregulated miRNA in solid and hematological malignancies (Volinia et al., 2006). miRNA-21 targets Spry2, BTG2 and PDCD4 thereby enhances oncogenic K-ras activation and modulates tumorigenesis in lung cancer (Hatley et al., 2010). miR-21 also targets PTEN, RECK, and Bcl-2 in lung squamous cell carcinoma that regulates cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumor invasiveness (XuLF et al., 2014) EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma have been found to be associated with significantly increased miRNA-21 expression and the blockade of miRNA-21 reverses the EMT phenotype associated with EGFR-TKI resistance (Seike et al., 2009; Byers et al., 2013). miRNA-21 also induces EGFR-TKI resistance either by activating the PI3K/Akt signal pathway or by inhibiting the PTEN and PDCD4 expression (Li et al., 2014). MiRNA-21 was observed to down-regulate the expression of SOCS1, SOCS6, and PTEN thereby promoting the development of Lung cancer (Xinying et al., 2016). In NSCLC cell line (A549), inhibition of miRNA-21 expression upregulates the expression of PDCD4 and ultimately reduced the proliferation, migration, and invasion (Yang et al., 2015). In the present study, we used magnetic bead technology for efficient miRNA isolation and highly sensitive and specific advanced TaqMan miRNA assay for the quantification of plasma miRNA-21 expression in lung cancer patients and healthy individuals. In order to prevent amplification bias, the ligation-based cDNA synthesis kit included miR-Amp primers which efficiently recognize the universal sequences added to every miRNA on the 5’ and 3’ end. We observed a significantly high level of miRNA-21 in the plasma of lung cancer patients than in healthy controls, reflecting its possible involvement in the development of lung cancer. A significant value of AUC (0.891) with 81.25% sensitivity and 80% specificity of plasma miRNA-21 for the screening of lung cancer patients were observed, which determines its potential utility as a circulatory marker for lung cancer diagnosis. Our results are consistent with the previous findings of Wei Zhao et al observed significantly higher serum miRNA-21 level in non small cell lung cancer patients than healthy people with 73.8% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity (Wei Zhao et al., 2015). Hankui Chen et al observed up-regulation of plasma miRNA-21 in patients with benign lung tumors as compared to normal controls (Chen et al., 2016). Over expression of miRNA-21 level in serum of non small cell lung cancer patients was observed especially in an advanced stage of lung cancer (Yang et al., 2015a; Yang et al., 2015b). In conclusion, we observed that plasma miRNA-21 can be efficiently extracted by the magnetic bead technology and quantified by the advanced TaqMan miRNA assay. Plasma miRNA-21 showed a high ability to distinguish between lung cancer patients and healthy individuals, therefore can be used as an efficient non-invasive biomarker for the screening of Lung cancer patients. However, further studies are required in order to establish the circulatory miRNA-21 as a potential biomarker for the lung cancer screening in clinical practice.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in relation to this article.
  19 in total

1.  Quantification of circulating miRNAs in plasma: effect of preanalytical and analytical parameters on their isolation and stability.

Authors:  Ioanna S Sourvinou; Athina Markou; Evi S Lianidou
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Serum miR-21 level: a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Jun-Jie Zhao; Long Zhang; Qin-Fu Xu; Yu-Miao Zhao; Xiao-Ya Shi; Ai-Guo Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Modulation of K-Ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21.

Authors:  Mark E Hatley; David M Patrick; Matthew R Garcia; James A Richardson; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eva van Rooij; Eric N Olson
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Downregulation of microRNA-21 expression restrains non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and migration through upregulation of programmed cell death 4.

Authors:  Y Yang; H Meng; Q Peng; X Yang; R Gan; L Zhao; Z Chen; J Lu; Q H Meng
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 5.987

5.  Emerging role of microRNA-21 in cancer.

Authors:  Yin-Hsun Feng; Chao-Jung Tsao
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-08-26

Review 6.  miRNA dysregulation in cancer: towards a mechanistic understanding.

Authors:  Jayanth Kumar Palanichamy; Dinesh S Rao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Evaluation of Plasma miR-21 and miR-152 as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Common Types of Human Cancers.

Authors:  Hankui Chen; Helu Liu; Hanqing Zou; Rui Chen; Yuhong Dou; Shile Sheng; Shengming Dai; Junmei Ai; Joshua Melson; Rick A Kittles; Mehdi Pirooznia; Michael J Liptay; Jeffrey A Borgia; Youping Deng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Urine miR-21-5p as a potential non-invasive biomarker for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Kao; Chao-Yu Pan; Chun-Hung Lai; Chew-Wun Wu; Wen-Liang Fang; Kuo-Hung Huang; Wen-Chang Lin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-07

9.  A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets.

Authors:  Stefano Volinia; George A Calin; Chang-Gong Liu; Stefan Ambs; Amelia Cimmino; Fabio Petrocca; Rosa Visone; Marilena Iorio; Claudia Roldo; Manuela Ferracin; Robyn L Prueitt; Nozumu Yanaihara; Giovanni Lanza; Aldo Scarpa; Andrea Vecchione; Massimo Negrini; Curtis C Harris; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Antisense oligonucleotides against microRNA-21 reduced the proliferation and migration of human colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Yi-Jing Tao; Yong-Ju Li; Wen Zheng; Juan-Juan Zhao; Meng-Meng Guo; Ya Zhou; Na-Lin Qin; Jing Zheng; Lin Xu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.722

View more
  12 in total

1.  Plasma miR-6089 as potential diagnostic biomarker for retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Xiu-Hong Li; An-Jie Shi; Jia Li; Hong-Feng Yuan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Deciphering the role of miR-187-3p/LRFN1 axis in modulating progression, aerobic glycolysis and immune microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenhao Xu; Wangrui Liu; Aihetaimujiang Anwaier; Xi Tian; Jiaqi Su; Guohai Shi; Shiyin Wei; Yuanyuan Qu; Hailiang Zhang; Dingwei Ye
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2022-07-07

3.  Serum microRNA-592 serves as a novel potential biomarker for early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhenguo Pan; Lin Miao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor by MiRNA-145 Inhibits Cell Growth and Sensitizes NSCLC Cells to Erlotinib.

Authors:  Jamal Amri; Neda Molaee; Maryam Baazm; Hadi Karami
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-09-01

5.  High diagnostic value of miRNAs for NSCLC: quantitative analysis for both single and combined miRNAs in lung cancer.

Authors:  Minhan Yi; Zexi Liao; Langmei Deng; Li Xu; Yun Tan; Kun Liu; Ziliang Chen; Yuan Zhang
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

6.  miRetrieve-an R package and web application for miRNA text mining.

Authors:  Julian Friedrich; Hans-Peter Hammes; Guido Krenning
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2021-12-23

7.  Up-Regulation of MiRNA-125a-5p Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Increases EGFR-TKI Induced Apoptosis in Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Jamal Amri; Neda Molaee; Hadi Karami
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-11-01

8.  Lung Cancer Cells Derived Circulating miR-21 Promotes Differentiation of Monocytes into Osteoclasts.

Authors:  Qian Zhao; Chang Liu; Ying Xie; Mengjia Tang; Guojing Luo; Xiang Chen; Li Tian; Xijie Yu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The diagnostic role of microRNA 21 in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Shreyash Rai; Pankaj Kumar Garg; Shuchi Bhatt; Thammineni Krishna Latha; Amit Kumar Verma; Basu Dev Banerjee; Mahendra Pal Singh
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec

Review 10.  The Role of Liquid Biopsy in Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Cláudia Freitas; Catarina Sousa; Francisco Machado; Mariana Serino; Vanessa Santos; Natália Cruz-Martins; Armando Teixeira; António Cunha; Tania Pereira; Hélder P Oliveira; José Luís Costa; Venceslau Hespanhol
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.