Literature DB >> 30255826

Review: Selecting for improved feed efficiency and reduced methane emissions in dairy cattle.

P Løvendahl1, G F Difford1, B Li1, M G G Chagunda2, P Huhtanen3, M H Lidauer4, J Lassen1, P Lund5.   

Abstract

It may be possible for dairy farms to improve profitability and reduce environmental impacts by selecting for higher feed efficiency and lower methane (CH4) emission traits. It remains to be clarified how CH4 emission and feed efficiency traits are related to each other, which will require direct and accurate measurements of both of these traits in large numbers of animals under the conditions in which they are expected to perform. The ranking of animals for feed efficiency and CH4 emission traits can differ depending upon the type and duration of measurement used, the trait definitions and calculations used, the period in lactation examined and the production system, as well as interactions among these factors. Because the correlation values obtained between feed efficiency and CH4 emission data are likely to be biased when either or both are expressed as ratios, therefore researchers would be well advised to maintain weighted components of the ratios in the selection index. Nutrition studies indicate that selecting low emitting animals may result in reduced efficiency of cell wall digestion, that is NDF, a key ruminant characteristic in human food production. Moreover, many interacting biological factors that are not measured directly, including digestion rate, passage rate, the rumen microbiome and rumen fermentation, may influence feed efficiency and CH4 emission. Elucidating these mechanisms may improve dairy farmers ability to select for feed efficiency and reduced CH4 emission.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digestibility; genetics; holobiont; microbiome; ranking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30255826     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118002276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  9 in total

1.  Eating Time as a Genetic Indicator of Methane Emissions and Feed Efficiency in Australian Maternal Composite Sheep.

Authors:  Boris J Sepulveda; Stephanie K Muir; Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Matthew I Knight; Ralph Behrendt; Iona M MacLeod; Jennie E Pryce; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Evaluation of the Links between Lamb Feed Efficiency and Rumen and Plasma Metabolomic Data.

Authors:  Florian Touitou; Flavie Tortereau; Lydie Bret; Nathalie Marty-Gasset; Didier Marcon; Annabelle Meynadier
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-03-29

3.  Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emission of Beef Heifers in Relation with Growth and Feed Efficiency.

Authors:  Gilles Renand; Aurélie Vinet; Virginie Decruyenaere; David Maupetit; Dominique Dozias
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Effects of Incorporating Dry Matter Intake and Residual Feed Intake into a Selection Index for Dairy Cattle Using Deterministic Modeling.

Authors:  Kerry Houlahan; Flavio S Schenkel; Dagnachew Hailemariam; Jan Lassen; Morten Kargo; John B Cole; Erin E Connor; Silvia Wegmann; Oliveira Junior; Filippo Miglior; Allison Fleming; Tatiane C S Chud; Christine F Baes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Integrated meta-omics reveals new ruminal microbial features associated with feed efficiency in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Ming-Yuan Xue; Yun-Yi Xie; Yifan Zhong; Xiao-Jiao Ma; Hui-Zeng Sun; Jian-Xin Liu
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 14.650

6.  Host Genome-Metagenome Analyses Using Combinatorial Network Methods Reveal Key Metagenomic and Host Genetic Features for Methane Emission and Feed Efficiency in Cattle.

Authors:  Stefano Cardinale; Haja N Kadarmideen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Bovine host genome acts on rumen microbiome function linked to methane emissions.

Authors:  Marina Martínez-Álvaro; Marc D Auffret; Carol-Anne Duthie; Richard J Dewhurst; Matthew A Cleveland; Mick Watson; Rainer Roehe
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-04-12

8.  Enteric methane mitigation interventions.

Authors:  Julia Q Fouts; Mallory C Honan; Breanna M Roque; Juan M Tricarico; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-08

9.  Relationships among feed efficiency traits across production segments and production cycles in cattle.

Authors:  Phillip A Lancaster; Michael E Davis; Jack J Rutledge; Larry V Cundiff
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.