Literature DB >> 30255647

Safety of primary anastomosis following emergency left sided colorectal resection: an international, multi-centre prospective audit.

.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Some evidence suggests that primary anastomosis following left sided colorectal resection in the emergency setting may be safe in selected patients, and confer favourable outcomes to permanent enterostomy. The aim of this study was to compare the major postoperative complication rate in patients undergoing end stoma vs primary anastomosis following emergency left sided colorectal resection.
METHODS: A pre-planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology 2017 audit. Adult patients (> 16 years) who underwent emergency (unplanned, within 24 h of hospital admission) left sided colonic or rectal resection were included. The primary endpoint was the 30-day major complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 to 5).
RESULTS: From 591 patients, 455 (77%) received an end stoma, 103 a primary anastomosis (17%) and 33 primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma (6%). In multivariable models, anastomosis was associated with a similar major complication rate to end stoma (adjusted odds ratio for end stoma 1.52, 95%CI 0.83-2.79, P = 0.173). Although a defunctioning stoma was not associated with reduced anastomotic leak (12% defunctioned [4/33] vs 13% not defunctioned [13/97], adjusted odds ratio 2.19, 95%CI 0.43-11.02, P = 0.343), it was associated with less severe complications (75% [3/4] with defunctioning stoma, 86.7% anastomosis only [13/15]), a lower mortality rate (0% [0/4] vs 20% [3/15]), and fewer reoperations (50% [2/4] vs 73% [11/15]) when a leak did occur.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary anastomosis in selected patients appears safe after left sided emergency colorectal resection. A defunctioning stoma might mitigate against risk of subsequent complications. Colorectal Disease
© 2018 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Surgery; anastomotic leak; colon cancer; emergency surgery; gastrointestinal surgery; rectal cancer; surgical complications; surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30255647     DOI: 10.1111/codi.14373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial.

Authors:  Benjamin Wiesler; Jörn-Markus Gass; Carsten Th Viehl; Alexandra Müller; Jürg Metzger; Mark Hartel; Christian Nebiker; Robert Rosenberg; Raffaele Galli; Urs Zingg; Alex Ochsner; Lukas Eisner; Martina Pabst; Mathias Worni; Mark Henschel; Markus von Flüe; Markus Zuber; Marco von Strauss Und Torney
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2022-07-14

2.  Stoma care research in low- and middle-income countries: update from the NIHR global health research unit on global surgery.

Authors:  A Ademuyiwa; A Adisa; A A Bhangu; J C Glasbey; M C Lapitan; V Msosa; D Sacdalan; J Simoes
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-05-07

3.  Patterns of prevalence and contemporary clinical management strategies in complicated acute biliary calculous disease: an ESTES 'snapshot audit' of practice.

Authors:  Gary Alan Bass; Amy Gillis; Yang Cao; Shahin Mohseni
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Authors: 
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 3.917

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.