Literature DB >> 30255538

Response to: Fundamental Differences in Burst Stimulation Waveform Design: Eliminating Confusion in the Marketplace.

Koen P V Meuwissen1,2, Jianwen Wendy Gu3, Tianhe C Zhang3, Elbert A J Joosten1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 30255538     DOI： 10.1111/ner.12857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN： 1094-7159


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Real-World Evidence and Outcomes Data.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Rudy Malayil; Terje Kirketeig; Timothy Deer
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation Both Activate Spinal GABAergic Mechanisms to Attenuate Pain in a Rat Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Koen P V Meuwissen; Luuk E de Vries; Jianwen Wendy Gu; Tianhe C Zhang; Elbert A J Joosten
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Study protocol: Effects of active versus passive recharge burst spinal cord stimulation on pain experience in persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2: a multicentre randomized trial (BURST-RAP study).

Authors:  Martijn R Mons; Caro Edelbroek; Xander Zuidema; Katja Bürger; Lars Elzinga; Jessica de Vries; Sander van Kuijk; Elbert A Joosten; Jan-Willem Kallewaard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.728
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.