Literature DB >> 30255391

Measuring the Effects of Education in Detecting Lung Cancer on Chest Radiographs: Utilization of a New Assessment Tool.

Junghyun Kim1, Kwan Hyoung Kim2.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of group and individualized educational lectures to accurately interpret chest radiographs of lung cancer patients and to introduce a new educational tool in evaluating skills for reading chest radiographs. Utilizing "hotspot" technology will be instrumental in measuring the effect of education in interpreting chest radiographs. There were 48 participants in the study. Chest radiographs of 100 lung cancer patients and 11 healthy patients taken at various time points were used for evaluation. Using "hotspot" technology, lesions on each radiograph were outlined. Values were taken at baseline, after which the group received lectures. Several days later, they underwent exam 2. Exam 3 was conducted after individualized lectures. A final exam was taken after the participants underwent individualized training within 2 months. Scores significantly improved after the individual lessons (p < 0.001). This improvement in performance decreased in the final examination. Statistically significant differences were observed between exam 2 vs. exam 3 and exam 3 vs. the final exam (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Participants demonstrated more improvement in detecting lesions in abnormal chest radiographs than in identifying normal ones. Although there was significant improvement in detecting abnormal radiographs by the end of the study (p < 0.001), no improvement was observed in detecting normal ones. We measured lung cancer detection rate using a new "hotspot" detection tool for chest radiographs. With the proposed scoring system, this tool could be objectively used in evaluating the educational effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Hotspot; Lung; Radiograph

Year:  2019        PMID: 30255391     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1431-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  18 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists' performance--initial experience.

Authors:  Junji Shiraishi; Hiroyuki Abe; Roger Engelmann; Masahito Aoyama; Heber MacMahon; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Learning/feedback activities and high-quality teaching: perceptions of third-year medical students during an inpatient rotation.

Authors:  Dario M Torre; Deborah Simpson; James L Sebastian; D Michael Elnicki
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Teaching Systematic Viewing to Final-Year Medical Students Improves Systematicity but Not Coverage or Detection of Radiologic Abnormalities.

Authors:  Koos van Geel; Ellen M Kok; Joost Dijkstra; Simon G F Robben; Jeroen J G van Merriënboer
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Effect of Massed Versus Interleaved Teaching Method on Performance of Students in Radiology.

Authors:  Anna Rozenshtein; Gregory D N Pearson; Sherry X Yan; Andrew Z Liu; Dennis Toy
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Interpretation of chest roentgenograms by primary care physicians.

Authors:  L Kuritzky; R I Haddy; R W Curry
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Lung cancer detection. Results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia.

Authors:  A Kubík; J Polák
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The effect of a chest imaging lecture on emergency department doctors' ability to interpret chest CT images: a randomized study.

Authors:  Gerben Keijzers; Vasugi Sithirasenan
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.799

8.  Measuring performance in the interpretation of chest radiographs: a pilot study.

Authors:  Y Chen; J J James; L Dong; A G Gale
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 9.  Screening for lung cancer. Another look; a different view.

Authors:  G M Strauss; R E Gleason; D J Sugarbaker
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project.

Authors:  R S Fontana; D R Sanderson; L B Woolner; W F Taylor; W E Miller; J R Muhm; P E Bernatz; W S Payne; P C Pairolero; E J Bergstralh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Role of chest radiographs in early lung cancer detection.

Authors:  Junghyun Kim; Kwan Hyoung Kim
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.