Literature DB >> 30255360

The role of robotics in cardiac surgery: a systematic review.

Ilias P Doulamis1,2, Eleftherios Spartalis3,4, Nikolaos Machairas4,5, Dimitrios Schizas4,6, Dimitrios Patsouras3,4, Michael Spartalis7, Diamantis I Tsilimigras3, Demetrios Moris8, Dimitrios C Iliopoulos3, Aspasia Tzani3, Dimitrios Dimitroulis4,9, Nikolaos I Nikiteas3,4.   

Abstract

The application of robotic technologies in cardiac surgery has provided the possibility for minimally invasive access inside the thorax and avoidance of a median sternotomy. Given that current evidence seems promising, we sought to systematically review the existing literature regarding the efficacy, feasibility and mortality rate associated with robotic cardiac surgery. The PubMed and Cochrane bibliographical databases were thoroughly searched for the following MeSH terms: "robotic", "cardiac surgery" and "heart surgery". Original studies on robotic cardiac surgery in more than ten cases and reporting on the associated peri- or post-operative mortality were deemed eligible. Twenty-eight studies were included and provided data for 5993 patients with a mean age of 59.8 years. Approximately, one out of two patients (49.2%) underwent robotic CABG, while the other half (49.9%) underwent robotic MVR. Robotic atrial septal defect repair and atrial tumor resection were performed in a small proportion (0.9%) of the patients. Mean 30-day mortality was 0.7% ranging from 0 to 0.8% among the different types of surgery, while late mortality was 0.8% ranging from 0 to 1% with a mean follow-up period of 40.1 months. Our findings demonstrate that the application of robotics in cardiac surgery has provided a safe and efficacious alternative to the traditional techniques. However, more trials are necessary to elucidate all of its aspects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic; Robotic cardiac surgery; Robotically assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30255360     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0875-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  33 in total

1.  Robotic coronary artery surgery--the evolution of a new minimally invasive approach in coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  U Kappert; R Cichon; J Schneider; V Gulielmos; S M Tugtekin; K Matschke; I Schramm; S Schueler
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically enhanced telemanipulation: report of forty-five cases.

Authors:  S Dogan; T Aybek; E Andressen; C Byhahn; S Mierdl; K Westphal; G Matheis; A Moritz; G Wimmer-Greinecker
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Robotic-enhanced coronary surgery in octogenarians.

Authors:  Apostolos Roubelakis; Filip Casselman; Johan van der Merwe; Bernard Stockman; Ivan Degrieck; Frank Van Praet
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  The state of robotic cardiac surgery in Europe.

Authors:  Matteo Pettinari; Emiliano Navarra; Philippe Noirhomme; Herbert Gutermann
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-01

5.  Traditional coronary artery bypass graft versus totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft or robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft--meta-analysis of 16 studies.

Authors:  S Wang; J Zhou; J-F Cai
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.507

6.  Early experience with robotic mitral valve repair with intra-aortic occlusion.

Authors:  Risto Kesävuori; Peter Raivio; Janne J Jokinen; Antero Sahlman; Kari Teittinen; Antti Vento
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Critical Outcomes in Nonrobotic vs Robotic-Assisted Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Franz Yanagawa; Martin Perez; Ted Bell; Rod Grim; Jennifer Martin; Vanita Ahuja
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience.

Authors:  Didier de Cannière; Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker; Romuald Cichon; Vassilios Gulielmos; Frank Van Praet; Usha Seshadri-Kreaden; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  Systematic review of robotic minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Michael Seco; Christopher Cao; Paul Modi; Paul G Bannon; Michael K Wilson; Michael P Vallely; Kevin Phan; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich Mohr; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

10.  Is there an optimal minimally invasive technique for left anterior descending coronary artery bypass?

Authors:  Olivier Jegaden; Fabrice Wautot; Thomas Sassard; Isabella Szymanik; Abdel Shafy; Joel Lapeze; Fadi Farhat
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 1.637

View more
  3 in total

1.  Safe implementation of robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: application of learning curves and cumulative sum analysis.

Authors:  Jef Van den Eynde; Hannah Vaesen Bentein; Tom Decaluwé; Herbert De Praetere; MaryAnn C Wertan; Francis P Sutter; Husam H Balkhy; Wouter Oosterlinck
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Total Thoracoscopic versus Robotic Surgery for Repair of Atrial Septum Defect: A Propensity Matching Score Analysis.

Authors:  Yanyi Liu; Zhuang Liu; Xin Li; Ning Li; Ruirui Kong; Yiyao Jiang; Shenglin Ge; Chengxin Zhang
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Robot-Assisted Repair of Atrial Septal Defect: A Comparison of Beating and Non-Beating Heart Surgery.

Authors:  Taeyoung Yun; Hakju Kim; Bongyeon Sohn; Hyoung Woo Chang; Cheong Lim; Kay-Hyun Park
Journal:  J Chest Surg       Date:  2022-02-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.