Literature DB >> 30255216

In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of two rotary single-file endodontic systems: OneCurve versus OneShape.

Marco Serafin1, Matteo De Biasi2, Vittorio Franco3, Daniele Angerame4.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the difference in cyclic fatigue resistance between OneCurve (OC) and OneShape (OS) endodontic single-file NiTi systems in a severely curved artificial canal. After sample size calculation (α = 0.01; β = 0.20; σ = 20.0; δ = 20.0), 25 OC and 25 OS files were used. An artificial canal with 60° angle and 5-mm radius of curvature was milled in a stainless-steel block reproducing the size and taper of the files used. The test device was electrically heated to maintain the environmental temperature at 37 °C. All files were rotated until fracture; the time to failure was recorded and the number of cycles to fracture (NCF) calculated. The length of the fractured fragments was measured too. Fractographic examination and cross-sectional area calculation were performed by scanning electron microscopy analysis (SEM). Data were statistically analyzed using an independent sample t test. The significance level was set at 0.01. Statistical analysis showed that OC files exhibited significantly greater cyclic fatigue resistance than OS (p < 0.001), with 721 ± 89 NCF and 301 ± 38 NCF, respectively. No significant difference was found in the length of the fractured fragments (p > 0.01). SEM fractographic analysis confirmed that all the scanned samples separated due to cyclic fatigue. Within the limitations of the present study, OC endodontic instruments resisted to cyclic fatigue better than OS. The improved mechanical resistance of OC could be related to new NiTi alloy used for their manufacturing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous rotation; Cyclic fatigue; Nickel–titanium; Scanning electron microscopy; Single-file system

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30255216     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-018-0390-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of One Curve, F6 Skytaper, Protaper Next, and Hyflex CM endodontic files.

Authors:  Charlotte Gouédard; Laurent Pino; Reza Arbab-Chirani; Shabnam Arbab-Chirani; Valérie Chevalier
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2022-03-04

2.  Resistance to Cyclic Fatigue of Nickel-Titanium Files Immersed in Sodium Hypochlorite at Body Temperature.

Authors:  Hind F Abuhulaibah; Ammar AbuMostafa
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-09-19

3.  Evaluation of the Cyclic Fatigue of Two Single Files at Body and Room Temperature with Different Radii of Curvature.

Authors:  Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa; Valeria Shumakova; Gaetano Isola; Francesco Indelicato; Calogero Bugea; Eugenio Pedullà
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Effect of various single file systems on microcrack formation in root canals: Scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  Neelam Chandwani; Aastha Ranka; Ganesh R Jadhav; Dolly Jagyasi; Pooja Bopche; Arihant Golchha
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-07-19

5.  Influence of Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidine on the Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of XP Endo Shaper Instruments.

Authors:  Alexandra Aparecida Tanomaru; Ana Grasiela Limoeiro; Adriana de Jesus Soares; Elson Lopes Medeiros Junior; Gabriel Rocha Campos; Sílvia Kaoru Hamasaki; Wayne Martins Nascimento; Luiz Meton Horta; Paula Avelar da Silva Ribeiro Goulart; Viviane Rangel do Couto; Patrícia Bastos Alves; Verônica Magalhães; Danilo De Luca Campos; Marcos Frozoni
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-12-22

6.  Influence of kinematics and incidence angles on the cutting efficiency of two single-file nickel-titanium rotary instruments.

Authors:  Eugenio Pedullà; Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa; Giuseppe Romano; Giuseppe Leanza; Silvia Rapisarda; Gaetano Isola; Sebastiano Ferlito; Prasanna Neelakantan; Luigi Generali
Journal:  Aust Endod J       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.719

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.