| Literature DB >> 30255102 |
Agnieszka Chwałczyńska1, Tomasz Rutkowski2, Grzegorz Jędrzejewski3, Dorota Wójtowicz4, Krzysztof A Sobiech1.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the segmental body composition with the use of fat-fat-free (FFF) index in children at early school age, depending on sex and place of residence, with particular emphasis on urban and rural areas. The study consisted of 329 children aged 7.78 (SD = 0.88; mean age in years). The study group was divided according to the place of residence and sex. The height and body mass, Body Mass Index (BMI), segmental body composition (Tanita BC-418MA), and FFF were calculated. A more frequent occurrence of excessive body weight was observed in children from rural areas (over 20%) compared to their peers from the urban area (10%). Statistically significant lower values of FFF index as well as in the lower limbs and torso were observed in the case of the examined children from the urban area as compared with their peers from the rural areas. The body composition of children living in metropolitan and rural areas is diverse. Lower values of FFF indexes were found in children from the city than in children living in villages. There are more children in the city with signs of being underweight and of normative body mass and paradoxically more overweight ones in the village.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30255102 PMCID: PMC6142738 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9694615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Anthropometric data of the studied children from the urban and rural areas.
| Urban Girls (GU) | Rural Girls (GR) | p | Urban Boys (BU) | Rural Boys (BR) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height [cm] | 126.77 ± 7.35 | 128.62 ± 7.80 | p = 0.11 | 129.01 ± 6.73 | 130.35 ± 7.67 | p = 0.25 |
|
| ||||||
| Weight [kg] | 25.69 ± 5.38 | 27.77 ± 5.77 | p = 0.01 | 27.27 ± 5.37 | 29.55 ± 7.78 | p = 0.04# |
|
| ||||||
| BMI [kg/m2] | 15.85 ± 2.15 | 16.66 ± 2.36 | p = 0.02 | 16.24 ± 1.99 | 17.18 ± 3.10 | p = 0.03# |
|
| ||||||
| BMI for age percentile | 45.39 ± 29.94 | 54.65 ± 30.17 | p = 0.04 | 46.99 ± 27.43 | 54.25 ± 28.27 | p = 0.11 |
|
| ||||||
| Adipose tissue in percent | 21.10 ± 3.67 | 22.44 ± 4.03 | p = 0.02 | 18.89 ± 3.64 | 20.50 ± 5.10 | p = 0.02# |
|
| ||||||
| Fat Mass | 5.57 ± 2.14 | 6.41 ± 2.40 | p = 0.01 | 5.30 ± 1.97 | 6.41 ± 3.65 | p = 0.02# |
|
| ||||||
| Fat – free mass | 20.13 ± 3.46 | 21.36 ± 3.62 | p = 0.02 | 21.98 ± 3.62 | 23.15 ± 4.39 | p = 0.07 |
∗ Differences statistically significant between girls from urban and rural area. # Differences statistically significant between boys from urban and rural area.
Figure 1Occurrence of body mass abnormalities in the examined children depending on the place of residence.
The segmental body composition of the examined children from urban and rural areas.
| Urban Girls (GU) | Rural Girls (GR) | p | Urban Boys (BU) | Rural Boys (BR) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right leg (RL) | ||||||
| FatP [%] | 29.82 ± 3.45 | 30.96 ± 4.14 | p = 0.09 | 27.34 ± 3.38 | 28.58 ± 5.00 | p = 0.07 |
| FatM [kg] | 1.30 ± 0.45 | 1.47 ± 0.48 | p = 0.02 | 1.27 ± 0.46 | 1.63 ± 1.11 | p = 0.01# |
| FFM [kg] | 3.01 ± 0.63 | 3.23 ± 0.68 | p = 0.02 | 3.28 ± 0.79 | 3.53 ± 1.00 | p = 0.08 |
|
| ||||||
| Left leg (LL) | ||||||
| FatP [%] | 30.18 ± 3.41 | 31.47 ± 4.21 | p = 0.06 | 27.47 ± 3.42 | 28.81 ± 4.97 | p = 0.06 |
| FatM [kg] | 1.29 ± 0.44 | 1.46 ± 0.48 | p = 0.01 | 1.25 ± 0.46 | 1.59 ± 1.08 | p = 0.01# |
| FFM [kg] | 2.91 ± 0.59 | 3.11 ± 0.64 | p = 0.03 | 3.18 ± 0.77 | 3.42 ± 0.97 | p = 0.10 |
|
| ||||||
| Right arm (RA) | ||||||
| FatP [%] | 32.23 ± 3.42 | 32.76 ± 4.38 | p = 0.44 | 28.75 ± 3.98 | 29.26 ± 4.72 | p = 0.48 |
| FatM [kg] | 0.37 ± 0.13 | 0.42 ± 0.15 | p = 0.03 | 0.34 ± 0.12 | 0.41 ± 0.25 | p = 0.02# |
| FFM [kg] | 0.76 ± 0.18 | 0.82 ± 0.18 | p = 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.19 | 0.89 ± 0.25 | p = 0.05 |
|
| ||||||
| Left arm (LA) | ||||||
| FatP [%] | 32.50 ± 4.15 | 33.32 ± 5.17 | p = 0.31 | 29.27 ± 3.88 | 30.26 ± 4.93 | p = 0.17 |
| FatM [kg] | 0.39 ± 0.16 | 0.43 ± 0.16 | p = 0.09 | 0.37 ± 0.13 | 0.46 ± 0.28 | p = 0.01# |
| FFM [kg] | 0.79 ± 0.18 | 0.84 ± 0.18 | p = 0.05 | 0.88 ± 0.21 | 0.94 ± 0.25 | p = 0.08 |
|
| ||||||
| Trunk (TR) | ||||||
| FatP [%] | 14.39 ± 3.90 | 15.63 ± 4.87 | p = 0.11 | 12.70 ± 3.78 | 13.93 ± 4.69 | p = 0.08 |
| FatM [kg] | 2.23 ± 1.01 | 2.64 ± 1.15 | p = 0.01 | 2.09 ± 0.91 | 3.05 ± 3.14 | p = 0.01# |
| FFM [kg] | 12.70 ± 1.93 | 13.38 ± 1.99 | p = 0.02 | 13.85 ± 1.71 | 14.34 ± 1.96 | p = 0.11 |
∗ Differences statistically significant between girls from urban and rural area. # Differences statistically significant between boys from urban and rural area.
Figure 2Fat–fat-free (FFF) index in the examined children depending on the place of residence. (∗ indicates differences statistically significant between girls from urban area and girls from rural area; # indicates differences statistically significant between boys from urban area and boys from rural area).
Figure 3Percentage distribution of adipose tissue in examined children depending on sex and place of residence.