| Literature DB >> 30254891 |
Hyun-Jin Choi1, Hyun-Soo Kim2, Tae-Joong Kim1, Sang Yong Song3, E Sun Paik1, Eun Jin Heo1, Jin-Young Park4, Yoo-Young Lee1, Chel Hun Choi1, Jeong-Won Lee1, Byoung-Gie Kim1, Duk-Soo Bae1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of proximal tube destruction at the uterine cornu by additional application of a sealing device.Entities:
Keywords: bipolar sealing device; cancer prevention; fallopian tube; opportunistic salpingectomy; ovarian cancer
Year: 2017 PMID: 30254891 PMCID: PMC6135172 DOI: 10.1016/j.gmit.2016.12.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther ISSN: 2213-3070
Figure 1A total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study. The uterine cornu on one side was treated with additional cauterization. The laterality of additional cauterization was decided randomly. Fourteen patients were excluded from histopathologic examination. We collected a total of 52 cornual interstitial tubal tissues from 26 patients for histopathologic examination. AD = tissue group with additional cauterization performed with a sealing device at the uterine cornu; N = number of patients; NO = tissue group without additional cauterization performed with a sealing device at the uterine cornu; TN = number of interstitial cornual tubes.
Figure 2(A) First, the salpinx was resected using a sealing device. (B) After resection of the salpinx, additional cauterization was applied to the uterine cornu for 10 seconds. (C) After the uterus was extracted through the vagina, cornual tissues were obtained. Tissues were numbered from 1 to 6 sequentially from right lateral to left lateral.
Figure 3(A) Tubal epithelium presenting with thermal destruction. (B) Tubal epithelium without thermal destruction. (C) Tubal epithelium presenting without thermal destruction. (D) Tubal epithelium without thermal destruction. (Original magnification, ×200).
Baseline characteristics and surgical procedures.
| Enrolled patients ( | |
|---|---|
| Age (y), median (range) | 43.5 (37–57) |
| Previous abdominal surgeries | |
| 1 | 1 (3.8) |
| 2 | 5 (19.2) |
| ≥ 3 | 1 (3.8) |
| Indication for surgery | |
| Symptomatic uterine myoma and/or adenomyosis | 22 (84.6) |
| Cervical dysplasia | 1 (3.8) |
| Endometrial pathology | 1 (3.8) |
| Uterine prolapse | 2 (7.6) |
| Surgical procedure | |
| TLH + BS | 21 (80.8) |
| TLH + BSO or USO + US | 4 (15.4) |
| TLH + BSO + uterosacral ligament suspension | 1 (3.8) |
Data are presented as n (%).
BS = bilateral salpingectomy; BSO = bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; TLH = total laparoscopic hysterectomy; US = unilateral salpingectomy; USO = unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
Thermal destruction of tubal epithelium at the uterine cornu.
| Residual TE | TD | Complete TD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NO (26) | 19 (TD: 1) | 1 | 1 |
| AD (26) | 17 (TD: 16) | 26 | 21 |
| 0.764* (0.001**) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| Total (52) | 36 | 27 | 22 |
NO = no additional cauterization, AD = additional cauterization, TE = tubal epithelium, TD = thermal destruction. NO and AD were compared, and p-values were calculated. * p-value comparing proportion of Residual TE between NO and AD. ** p-value comparing of proportion of Thermal destruction between NO and AD.