| Literature DB >> 30254727 |
Javier Bobo-Pinilla1,2, Julio Peñas de Giles3, Noemí López-González1,2, Sonia Mediavilla4, M Montserrat Martínez-Ortega1,2.
Abstract
Quaternary glacial cycles appear to have had a consistent role in shaping the genetic diversity and structure of plant species. Despite the unusual combination of the characteristics of the western Mediterranean-Macaronesian area, there are no studies that have specifically examined the effects of palaeoclimatic and palaeogeographic factors on the genetic composition and structure of annual herbs. Astragalus edulis is a disjunct endemic found in the easternmost Canary Islands and the semi-arid areas of north-eastern Africa and south-eastern Iberian Peninsula. This endangered species shows no evident adaptations to long-distance dispersal. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data and plastid DNA sequences were analysed from a total of 360 individuals distributed throughout the range of this species. The modelled potential distribution of A. edulis under current conditions was projected over the climatic conditions of the Last Interglacial (130 ka BP) and Last Glacial Maximum (21 ka BP) to analyse changes in habitat suitability and to look for associations between the modelling and genetic results. Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis showed clear phylogeographic structure with four distinct genetic clusters. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) models based on plastid DNA sequences indicated a Middle Pleistocene long-distance dispersal event as the origin of the populations of the Canary Islands. The models also suggested south-western Morocco as the ancestral area for the species, as well as subsequent colonization of north-eastern Morocco and the Iberian Peninsula. The data compiled indicated the possibility of the presence of refuge areas at favourable locations around the High Atlas and Anti-Atlas mountain ranges. Moreover, palaeodistribution models strongly support the events inferred by ABC modelling and show the potential distribution of the species in the past, suggesting a putative colonization route.Entities:
Keywords: AFLP; Astragalus edulis; LDD; Macaronesian area; palaeogeographical models; phylogeography; plastid DNA; western Mediterranean
Year: 2018 PMID: 30254727 PMCID: PMC6150253 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/ply047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Figure 1.Sampling locations covering the present distribution of Astragalus edulis. Coast lines during the LGM (black shadow). Plastid haplotype distribution of the species; plastid haplotype network (circle size is proportional to the number of individuals for each haplotype). Clustering for the DIYABC analysis labelled (Iberian Peninsula; northern Morocco, NM; northern Atlas, NA; southern Atlas, SA; Canary Islands).
Locations, details and haplotypes for Astragalus edulis.
| Population code | Locality | DIYABC metapopulations | Altitude | Longitude | Latitude | New individuals | Total cpDNA individuals | Haplotypes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE1 | Spain; Almería, Alcubillas | IP | 735 | −2,6025 | 37,0987 | 8 | 12 | II and VII |
| AE2 | Spain; Almería, Tabernas | IP | 915 | −2,4643 | 37,1306 | 7 | 13 | I and VII |
| AE3 | Spain; Almería, Gérgal | IP | 720 | −2,5254 | 37,1209 | 8 | 16 | I and II |
| AE4 | Spain; Almería, Gérgal, Arroyo Verdelecho | IP | 648 | −2,4704 | 37,1002 | 8 | 14 | I, V and VII |
| AE5 | Spain; Almería, Tabernas, Desierto de Tabernas | IP | 621 | −2,4863 | 37,0668 | 7 | 13 | I, II and VII |
| AE6 | Spain; Almería, Filabres, Rambla del Saltador | IP | 541 | −2,3610 | 37,1206 | 7 | 15 | I |
| AE7 | Morocco; La Oriental, between El-Aïoun and Tanarchefi | NM | 919 | −2,6016 | 34,4174 | 12 | 14 | I |
| AE8 | Morocco; Taza, Jebel Guilliz | NM | 425 | −3,3496 | 34,4669 | 12 | 14 | I and II |
| AE9 | Morocco; Marrakech, Chemaia, prox. Kettara | NA | 480 | −8,1875 | 31,8729 | 10 | 12 | II and VII |
| AE10 | Morocco; Marrakech, between Marrakech and Chichaoua | NA | 380 | −8,6185 | 31,5720 | 12 | 14 | VIII |
| AE11 | Morocco; Taroudant, between Tasgount and Ighil | SA | 1437 | −8,4832 | 30,1831 | 12 | 14 | I, II, III and IV |
| AE12 | Morocco; Taroudant, between Irherm and Tata | SA | 1710 | −8,4478 | 30,0467 | 13 | 15 | I and II |
| AE13 | Morocco; Taroudant, Tafraoute, Tizi- n-Tarakatine, prox. El Jebar | SA | 1484 | −8,8587 | 29,7376 | 12 | 14 | II and VI |
| AE14 | Morocco; Taroudant, between Tafraoute and Tleta-Tasrite | SA | 1620 | −8,9385 | 29,6354 | 3 | 6 | II, VI and VII |
| AE15 | Spain; Canary Islands; Lanzarote, Vega de Temuime | CI | 159 | −13,728 | 28,9337 | 14 | 16 | IX |
| AE16 | Spain; Canary Islands; Fuerteventura, Tiscamanita | CI | 234 | −14,033 | 28,3576 | 7 | 9 | IX |
| AE17 | Spain; Canary Islands; Fuerteventura, Barranco de Majada Blanca | CI | 181 | −13,986 | 28,2673 | 13 | 15 | IX |
DIYABC estimated parameters and codes.
| Parameter | Parameter code | Prior distribution | Estimated parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Initial interval | Final interval | Mean | ||
| Population effective sizes of the IP group | NIp | Uniform | {10–100000} | {10–160000} | 3,13E+04 |
| Population effective sizes of the NM group | NNm | Uniform | {10–100000} | {10–40000} | 2,46E+04 |
| Population effective sizes of the NA group | NNa | Uniform | {10–100000} | {10–160000} | 1,08E+05 |
| Population effective sizes of the SA group | NSa | Uniform | {10–100000} | {10–120000} | 8,73E+04 |
| Population effective sizes of the CI group | NCi | Uniform | {10–100000} | {10–40000} | 1,45E+04 |
| Founder event for CI group | NCib | Uniform | {10–500} | {10–300} | 6,79E+01 |
| Time of founder event for CI group | t1 | Uniform | {10–1000000} | {10–200000} | 1,50E+05 |
| Isolation time for NA | t2 | Uniform | {10–1000000} | {10–30000} | 2,46E+04 |
| Divergence time among the Moroccan populations | t8 | Uniform | {10–1000000} | {10–200000} | |
| Divergence time among the IP + NM + SA groups | t3 | Uniform | {10–1000000} | {10–200000} | 4,11E+03 |
| Divergence time among the IP + NM + NA + SA groups | t4 | Uniform | {10–1000000} | {10–200000} | |
| Divergence time between CI and NA | t6 | Uniform | {10–1000000} | {10–200000} | |
| Divergence time between [CI + NA] and [IP + NM + SA] complex | t5 | Uniform | {10–1000000} | {10–200000} | |
| Divergence time among all groups | t0 | Uniform | {10–1000000} | {10–200000} | |
| Mean mutation rate | Mµ | Uniform | {10−9–10−7} | {10−9–10−7} | 3,44E-09 |
Figure 2.Results from the analysis of AFLP markers for K = 4. Histograms show the Bayesian clustering of individuals within populations, (A) admixture analysis, (B) population genetic structure.
Figure 3.Approximate Bayesian computation analysis of Astragalus edulis. Most likely DIYABC scenarios (posterior probability is shown); Time is not to scale; Areas (southern Atlas, SA; northern Atlas, NA; northern Morocco, NM; Iberian Peninsula, IP; Canary Islands, CI; Canary Islands founder event, CIb).
Figure 4.Distribution models; habitat suitability is represented by green-yellow to red (red-yellow = medium, green = high). (A) Present; (B) LGM; (C) LIG. Dotted line represents the south to north colonization route along Morocco. Black dots represent current localities of the species.