Maxime Cavalier1, Stéphane Jullion2, Jean Kany3, Jean Grimberg4, Yves Lefebvre5, Didier Oudet6, Sophie Grosclaude7, Christophe Charousset8, Pascal Boileau9, Thierry Joudet9, Nicolas Bonnevialle10. 1. IULS, hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice, 30, voie romaine, 06001 Nice, France. Electronic address: maximecav@hotmail.com. 2. Centre chirurgical Emile Gallé, CHRU, 49, rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France. 3. Clinique de l'Union, 31240 Saint-Jean, France. 4. LIRCOS, 75016 Paris, France. 5. Clinique Rhéna, 16, allée de la Robertsau, 67000 Strasbourg, France. 6. Clinique de l'Alliance, 1, boulevard Alfred Nobel, 37540 Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire, France. 7. Clinique du Prac, 155, ter boulevard Stalingrad, 69006 Lyon, France. 8. Clinique Turin, 3-11, rue de Turin, 75008 Paris, France. 9. Clinique chirurgical du Libournais, 33500 Libourne, France. 10. Service d'orthopédie, institut universitaire du sport, hôpital Riquet, CHU de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse cedex 09, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: No consensus exists about the management of massive and symptomatic rotator cuff tears (RCTs). The objective of this study was to compare the 12-month clinical outcomes of various treatment options for massive RCTs. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic surgery has a role to play in the treatment of massive and apparently irreparable RCTs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective multicentre non-randomised study was performed in patients with massive RCTs managed non-operatively (NONOP) or by arthroscopic tenotomy/tenodesis of the long head of biceps (aTLB), arthroscopic partial tendon repair (aPTR), arthroscopic latissimus dorsi transfer (aLDT), or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on the Constant score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score after 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The 218 included patients (mean age, 69 years) were distributed as follows: NONOP, n=71; aTLB, n=26; aPTR, n=61; aLDT, n=25; and RSA, n=35. After 12 months, the mean Constant score, SSV, and ASES score values were 70, 68%, and 73, respectively, and had improved significantly versus the preoperative values in all treatment groups. RSA was the only treatment followed by improvements in all Constant score items. Active forwards elevation improved significantly in the NONOP (+25°), aPTR (+26°), and RSA (+66°) groups. An improvement in active external rotation was seen only in the RSA group, where it was small (+10°, p=0.046). Significant increases in internal rotation were seen in the NONOP (+1.6 points) and aPTR (+1.7 points) groups. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic techniques (aTLB, aPTR, and aLDT) for managing massive irreparable RCTs produce significant functional gains. Partial tendon repair (aPTR) and RSA may provide better outcomes than isolated aTLB or aLDT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, non-randomised prospective study.
BACKGROUND: No consensus exists about the management of massive and symptomatic rotator cuff tears (RCTs). The objective of this study was to compare the 12-month clinical outcomes of various treatment options for massive RCTs. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic surgery has a role to play in the treatment of massive and apparently irreparable RCTs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective multicentre non-randomised study was performed in patients with massive RCTs managed non-operatively (NONOP) or by arthroscopic tenotomy/tenodesis of the long head of biceps (aTLB), arthroscopic partial tendon repair (aPTR), arthroscopic latissimus dorsi transfer (aLDT), or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on the Constant score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score after 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The 218 included patients (mean age, 69 years) were distributed as follows: NONOP, n=71; aTLB, n=26; aPTR, n=61; aLDT, n=25; and RSA, n=35. After 12 months, the mean Constant score, SSV, and ASES score values were 70, 68%, and 73, respectively, and had improved significantly versus the preoperative values in all treatment groups. RSA was the only treatment followed by improvements in all Constant score items. Active forwards elevation improved significantly in the NONOP (+25°), aPTR (+26°), and RSA (+66°) groups. An improvement in active external rotation was seen only in the RSA group, where it was small (+10°, p=0.046). Significant increases in internal rotation were seen in the NONOP (+1.6 points) and aPTR (+1.7 points) groups. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic techniques (aTLB, aPTR, and aLDT) for managing massive irreparable RCTs produce significant functional gains. Partial tendon repair (aPTR) and RSA may provide better outcomes than isolated aTLB or aLDT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, non-randomised prospective study.
Authors: Bauke Kooistra; Navin Gurnani; Alexander Weening; Michel van den Bekerom; Derek van Deurzen Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jonathan D Hughes; Brian Davis; Emily Whicker; Gregory R Sprowls; Lindsay Barrera; Ashkan Baradaran; Soheil Sabzevari; Jeremy M Burnham; Anup A Shah; Albert Lin Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 4.114
Authors: Samuel E Broida; Aidan P Sweeney; Michael B Gottschalk; Jarret M Woodmass; Eric R Wagner Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2021-08-09
Authors: Russell K Stewart; Lisa Kaplin; Stephen A Parada; Benjamin R Graves; Nikhil N Verma; Brian R Waterman Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-10-15