Jonathan Kam1, Sam Khadra2, Quoc Hoai Tran3, Hannah Ainsworth4, Mark Louie-Johnsun5, Matthew Winter6. 1. Nepean Urology Research Group (NURG), Kingswood, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: jonathan.s.kam@gmail.com. 2. Nepean Urology Research Group (NURG), Kingswood, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: skha7350@uni.sydney.edu.au. 3. Nepean Urology Research Group (NURG), Kingswood, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: tranhquoc@gmail.com. 4. Gosford District Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: ainsworth.hannah@gmail.com. 5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; Gosford District Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: mlj88a@hotmail.com. 6. Nepean Urology Research Group (NURG), Kingswood, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: drmatthewwinter@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of portable video media (PVM) compared to standard verbal communication (SVC) as a novel adjunct for surgical education of junior medical officers and medical students, in terms of knowledge acquisition and participant satisfaction. BACKGROUND: The effective, continued education of final year medical students and junior doctors is the foundation of quality healthcare. The development of new media technologies and rapid internet streaming has resulted in an opportunity for the integration of PVM into medical education. PVM is an educational platform with the advantage of being standardized, efficient, and readily available. DESIGN: This is a multicenter, prospective, and randomized controlled crossover study. Participants completed a preintervention knowledge test and were then randomized in an allocation ratio of 1:1 to receive surgical education regarding cystoscopy and ureteric stenting for acute renal colic via either PVM or SVC. A 32-point knowledge test and a modified Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 were then administered and the participants were then crossed over to the other educational method. The knowledge and satisfaction tests were then readministered. RESULTS:Fifty-four participants were recruited for this study with 27 participants in each group. Both groups had a 18% to 20% increase in knowledge scores following the first intervention p < 0.001 and on crossover there was a further 4% increase in knowledge scores, p < 0.01. There was no significant difference between the groups in knowledge scores before intervention, p = 0.23 after first intervention p = 0.74 or following crossover p = 0.09. After first intervention, participants in the group receiving PVM education first had a significant 8% higher satisfaction score compared to the SVC group, p = 0.023. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that PVM shows similar efficacy in information uptake to traditional forms of education. Furthermore, PVM was shown to have higher satisfaction scores compared to SVC. Further studies will need to evaluate the use of PVM for education in other surgical and medical domains and assess the long-term knowledge retention.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of portable video media (PVM) compared to standard verbal communication (SVC) as a novel adjunct for surgical education of junior medical officers and medical students, in terms of knowledge acquisition and participant satisfaction. BACKGROUND: The effective, continued education of final year medical students and junior doctors is the foundation of quality healthcare. The development of new media technologies and rapid internet streaming has resulted in an opportunity for the integration of PVM into medical education. PVM is an educational platform with the advantage of being standardized, efficient, and readily available. DESIGN: This is a multicenter, prospective, and randomized controlled crossover study. Participants completed a preintervention knowledge test and were then randomized in an allocation ratio of 1:1 to receive surgical education regarding cystoscopy and ureteric stenting for acute renal colic via either PVM or SVC. A 32-point knowledge test and a modified Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 were then administered and the participants were then crossed over to the other educational method. The knowledge and satisfaction tests were then readministered. RESULTS: Fifty-four participants were recruited for this study with 27 participants in each group. Both groups had a 18% to 20% increase in knowledge scores following the first intervention p < 0.001 and on crossover there was a further 4% increase in knowledge scores, p < 0.01. There was no significant difference between the groups in knowledge scores before intervention, p = 0.23 after first intervention p = 0.74 or following crossover p = 0.09. After first intervention, participants in the group receiving PVM education first had a significant 8% higher satisfaction score compared to the SVC group, p = 0.023. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that PVM shows similar efficacy in information uptake to traditional forms of education. Furthermore, PVM was shown to have higher satisfaction scores compared to SVC. Further studies will need to evaluate the use of PVM for education in other surgical and medical domains and assess the long-term knowledge retention.