Literature DB >> 30253117

Cautionary Notes on Use of the MoT3 Diagnostic Assay for Magnaporthe oryzae Wheat and Rice Blast Isolates.

Dipali Rani Gupta1, Claudia Sarai Reyes Avila2, Joe Win2, Darren M Soanes3, Lauren S Ryder2, Daniel Croll4, Pallab Bhattacharjee1, Md Shaid Hossain1, Nur Uddin Mahmud1, Md Shabab Mehebub1, Musrat Zahan Surovy1, Md Mahbubur Rahman1, Nicholas J Talbot2, Sophien Kamoun2, M Tofazzal Islam1.   

Abstract

The blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae is comprised of lineages that exhibit varying degrees of specificity on about 50 grass hosts, including rice, wheat, and barley. Reliable diagnostic tools are essential given that the pathogen has a propensity to jump to new hosts and spread to new geographic regions. Of particular concern is wheat blast, which has suddenly appeared in Bangladesh in 2016 before spreading to neighboring India. In these Asian countries, wheat blast strains are now co-occurring with the destructive rice blast pathogen raising the possibility of genetic exchange between these destructive pathogens. We assessed the recently described MoT3 diagnostic assay and found that it did not distinguish between wheat and rice blast isolates from Bangladesh. The assay is based on primers matching the WB12 sequence corresponding to a fragment of the M. oryzae MGG_02337 gene annotated as a short chain dehydrogenase. These primers could not reliably distinguish between wheat and rice blast isolates from Bangladesh based on DNA amplification experiments performed in separate laboratories in Bangladesh and in the United Kingdom. Specifically, all eight rice blast isolates tested in this study produced the WB12 amplicon. In addition, comparative genomics of the WB12 nucleotide sequence revealed a complex underlying genetic structure with related sequences across M. oryzae strains and in both rice and wheat blast isolates. We, therefore, caution against the indiscriminate use of this assay to identify wheat blast and encourage further development of the assay to ensure its value in diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30253117     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-18-0199-LE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  4 in total

1.  Averting wheat blast by implementing a 'wheat holiday': In search of alternative crops in West Bengal, India.

Authors:  Khondoker A Mottaleb; Pawan K Singh; Kai Sonder; Gideon Kruseman; Olaf Erenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Multiple internal controls enhance reliability for PCR and real time PCR detection of Rathayibacter toxicus.

Authors:  Mohammad Arif; Grethel Y Busot; Rachel Mann; Brendan Rodoni; James P Stack
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Wheat blast: A review from a genetic and genomic perspective.

Authors:  Md Motaher Hossain
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Omics Insight on Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat for Translational Research Perspective.

Authors:  Basavaraj Teli; Jyotika Purohit; Md Mahtab Rashid; A Abdul Kader Jailani; Anirudha Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.