Literature DB >> 30252100

Sex Differences in Glucose and Fatty Acid Metabolism in Asians Who Are Nonobese.

Zhiling Chan1, Yu Chung Chooi1, Cherlyn Ding1, John Choo1, Suresh Anand Sadananthan2, Navin Michael2, S Sendhil Velan2,3, Melvin Khee Leow1,4,5,6, Faidon Magkos1,7,8.   

Abstract

Context: The prevalence of diabetes is increasing throughout Asia, even in the absence of obesity, and is lower in women than in men. The underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Objective: To evaluate the sex differences in glucose and fatty acid metabolism in Asians who are nonobese. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore. Participants: Healthy Asian men (n = 32; body mass index, 21.8 ± 1.5 kg/m2; age, 42 ± 14 years) and women (n = 28; body mass index, 21.4 ± 2.0 kg/m2; age, 41 ± 13 years). Main Outcome Measures: Insulin sensitivity (insulin-mediated glucose uptake normalized for steady-state insulin; hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp), postprandial glucose, insulin and fatty acid concentrations, insulin secretion (mixed meal tolerance test with mathematical modeling), insulin clearance, body composition and fat distribution (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, MRI, and spectroscopy), cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal oxygen uptake; graded exercise test), and handgrip strength (dynamometry).
Results: Women had more total body fat but less visceral fat than men; liver and muscle lipid contents were not different. Maximal oxygen uptake and handgrip strength were lower in women than men. The postprandial glucose concentrations were ~8% lower, the insulin-mediated glucose uptake was ~16% greater, and the meal-induced suppression of fatty acid concentrations was significantly greater in women than in men (P < 0.05 for all). However, muscle insulin sensitivity was not different between the sexes. No differences were found in postprandial insulin secretion and clearance rates; however, the steady-state insulin clearance was ~17% lower in women. Conclusions: Asian women who are nonobese are more insulin-sensitive than men at the level of adipose tissue but not skeletal muscle. Therefore, sex differences in glucose tolerance are likely the result of sexual dimorphism in hepatic insulin action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30252100     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-01421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  12 in total

1.  Metabolically healthy obesity and metabolically obese normal weight: a review.

Authors:  Saioa Gómez-Zorita; Maite Queralt; Maria Angeles Vicente; Marcela González; María P Portillo
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.158

Review 2.  Different physiological mechanisms underlie an adverse cardiovascular disease risk profile in men and women.

Authors:  Alan Fappi; Bettina Mittendorfer
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.297

3.  Sex Differences in Insulin Sensitivity are Related to Muscle Tissue Acylcarnitine But Not Subcellular Lipid Distribution.

Authors:  Josiane L Broussard; Leigh Perreault; Emily Macias; Sean A Newsom; Kathleen Harrison; Hai Hoang Bui; Paul Milligan; Kenneth D Roth; Travis Nemkov; Angelo D'Alessandro; Joseph T Brozinick; Bryan C Bergman
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Multi-Timescale Rhythmicity of Blood Glucose and Insulin Delivery Reveals Key Advantages of Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy.

Authors:  Azure D Grant; Dana M Lewis; Lance J Kriegsfeld
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-10

5.  Association between dairy product intake and body composition among South Asian adults from the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) study.

Authors:  Bridget Murphy; Sameera A Talegawkar; Joyce O'Connor; Namratha R Kandula; Alka M Kanaya; Matthew A Allison; Niyati Parekh
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.125

Review 6.  Sexual Dimorphism of NAFLD in Adults. Focus on Clinical Aspects and Implications for Practice and Translational Research.

Authors:  Amedeo Lonardo; Ayako Suzuki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Antidiabetic Therapy in the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Yoshio Sumida; Masashi Yoneda; Katsutoshi Tokushige; Miwa Kawanaka; Hideki Fujii; Masato Yoneda; Kento Imajo; Hirokazu Takahashi; Yuichiro Eguchi; Masafumi Ono; Yuichi Nozaki; Hideyuki Hyogo; Masahiro Koseki; Yuichi Yoshida; Takumi Kawaguchi; Yoshihiro Kamada; Takeshi Okanoue; Atsushi Nakajima; Japan Study Group Of Nafld Jsg-Nafld
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Dissociation Between Insulin Resistance and Abnormalities in Lipoprotein Particle Concentrations and Sizes in Normal-Weight Chinese Adults.

Authors:  Kaare Tranæs; Cherlyn Ding; Yu Chung Chooi; Zhiling Chan; John Choo; Melvin K-S Leow; Faidon Magkos
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-02-26

9.  Lasting Effects of Low to Non-Lethal Radiation Exposure during Late Gestation on Offspring's Cardiac Metabolism and Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Ashley S Nemec-Bakk; Sarah Niccoli; Caitlund Davidson; Danika Roy; Lisa Stoa; Shayenthiran Sreetharan; Alain Simard; Douglas R Boreham; Joanna Y Wilson; T C Tai; Simon J Lees; Neelam Khaper
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20

10.  Glycaemia and hand grip strength in aging people: Guangzhou biobank cohort study.

Authors:  Xue Liang; Chao Qiang Jiang; Wei Sen Zhang; Feng Zhu; Ya Li Jin; Kar Keung Cheng; Tai Hing Lam; Lin Xu
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.