Literature DB >> 30251235

An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity.

Sarah R Davies1.   

Abstract

Research integrity and misconduct have recently risen to public attention as policy issues. Concern has arisen about divergence between this policy discourse and the language and concerns of scientists. This interview study, carried out in Denmark with a cohort of highly internationalised natural scientists, explores how researchers talk about integrity and good science. It finds, first, that these scientists were largely unaware of the Danish Code of Conduct for Responsible Conduct of Research and indifferent towards the value of such codes; second, that they presented an image of good science as nuanced and thereby as difficult to manage through abstracted, principle-based codes; and third, that they repeatedly pointed to systemic issues both as triggering misconduct and as ethical problems in and of themselves. Research integrity is framed as a part of wider moves to 'responsibilise' science; understood in these terms, resistance to codes of conduct and the representation of integrity as a problem of science as a whole can be seen as a rejection of a neoliberal individualisation of responsibility.

Keywords:  Ethics; Misconduct; RRI; Research integrity; Responsibility

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30251235     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0064-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  17 in total

1.  Co-responsibility for research integrity.

Authors:  Carl Mitcham
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Fraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. Institutional changes, rather than individual motivations, encourage misconduct.

Authors:  Martina Franzen; Simone Rödder; Peter Weingart
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Simon Godecharle; Benoit Nemery; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Many junior scientists need to take a hard look at their job prospects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study.

Authors:  David Shaw; Priya Satalkar
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; A Lauren Crain; Raymond De Vries; Melissa S Anderson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  To Whistleblow or Not to Whistleblow: Affective and Cognitive Differences in Reporting Peers and Advisors.

Authors:  Tristan McIntosh; Cory Higgs; Megan Turner; Paul Partlow; Logan Steele; Alexandra E MacDougall; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Conversations About Responsible Nanoresearch.

Authors:  Kamilla Lein Kjølberg; Roger Strand
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 0.917

9.  Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli; Rodrigo Costas; Ferric C Fang; Arturo Casadevall; Elisabeth M Bik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize.

Authors:  Shannon L Spruit; Gordon D Hoople; David A Rolfe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  8 in total

1.  Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk.

Authors:  Niels Mejlgaard; Lex M Bouter; George Gaskell; Panagiotis Kavouras; Nick Allum; Anna-Kathrine Bendtsen; Costas A Charitidis; Nik Claesen; Kris Dierickx; Anna Domaradzka; Andrea Reyes Elizondo; Nicole Foeger; Maura Hiney; Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner; Krishma Labib; Ana Marušić; Mads P Sørensen; Tine Ravn; Rea Ščepanović; Joeri K Tijdink; Giuseppe A Veltri
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Elevating the impact of conservation physiology by building a community devoted to excellence, transparency, ethics, integrity and mutual respect.

Authors:  Steven J Cooke; Kevin R Hultine; Jodie L Rummer; Nann A Fangue; Frank Seebacher; Erika J Eliason; Heath A MacMillan; Andrea Fuller; Craig E Franklin
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective.

Authors:  Govert Valkenburg; Guus Dix; Joeri Tijdink; Sarah de Rijcke
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet.

Authors:  Håkan Salwén
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Responsible research and innovation training programs: implementation and evaluation of the HEIRRI project.

Authors:  Ružica Tokalić; Ivan Buljan; Niels Mejlgaard; Mar Carrió; Alexander Lang; Gema Revuelta; Ana Marušić
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2021-11-02

6.  RESPONSE_ABILITY A Card-Based Engagement Method to Support Researchers' Ability to Respond to Integrity Issues.

Authors:  Ulrike Felt; Florentine Frantz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.777

7.  Stakeholders' Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries.

Authors:  Natalie Evans; Ivan Buljan; Emanuele Valenti; Lex Bouter; Ana Marušić; Raymond de Vries; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.777

8.  Atmospheres of science: Experiencing scientific mobility.

Authors:  Sarah R Davies
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 3.885

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.