Shih-Chiang Shen1,2, Weu Wang2,3, Ka-Wai Tam1,2,4, Hsin-An Chen1,2, Yen-Kuang Lin5,6, Shih-Yun Wang7, Ming-Te Huang1,2, Yen-Hao Su8,9,10. 1. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan. 2. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Research Center of Biostatistics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 7. Metabolic and Weight Management Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan. 8. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan. ntusyh@gmail.com. 9. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. ntusyh@gmail.com. 10. Metabolic and Weight Management Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan. ntusyh@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Many risk prediction models of diabetes remission after bariatric and metabolic surgery have been proposed. Most models have been created using Roux-en-Y gastric bypass cohorts. However, validation of these models in sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is limited. The objective of our study is to validate the performance of risk prediction models of diabetes remission in obese patients with diabetes who underwent SG. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included 128 patients who underwent SG with at least 1 year follow-up from Dec 2011 to Sep 2016 as the validation cohort. A literature review revealed total 11 models with 2 categories (scoring system and logistic regression), which were validated by our study dataset. Discrimination was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) while calibration by Hosmer-Lemeshow test and predicted versus observed remission ratio. RESULTS: At 1 year after surgery, 71.9% diabetes remission (HbA1c < 6.0 off medication) and 61.4% excess weight loss were observed. Individual metabolic surgery, ABCD, DiaRem, Advanced-DiaRem, DiaBetter, Ana et al., and Dixon et al. models showed excellent discrimination power (AUC > 0.8). In calibration, all models overestimated diabetes remission from 5 to 30% but did not lose their goodness of fit. CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive external validation of current risk prediction models of diabetes remission at 1 year after SG. Seven models showed excellent predicting power, and scoring models were recommended more because of their easy utility.
INTRODUCTION: Many risk prediction models of diabetes remission after bariatric and metabolic surgery have been proposed. Most models have been created using Roux-en-Y gastric bypass cohorts. However, validation of these models in sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is limited. The objective of our study is to validate the performance of risk prediction models of diabetes remission in obesepatients with diabetes who underwent SG. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included 128 patients who underwent SG with at least 1 year follow-up from Dec 2011 to Sep 2016 as the validation cohort. A literature review revealed total 11 models with 2 categories (scoring system and logistic regression), which were validated by our study dataset. Discrimination was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) while calibration by Hosmer-Lemeshow test and predicted versus observed remission ratio. RESULTS: At 1 year after surgery, 71.9% diabetes remission (HbA1c < 6.0 off medication) and 61.4% excess weight loss were observed. Individual metabolic surgery, ABCD, DiaRem, Advanced-DiaRem, DiaBetter, Ana et al., and Dixon et al. models showed excellent discrimination power (AUC > 0.8). In calibration, all models overestimated diabetes remission from 5 to 30% but did not lose their goodness of fit. CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive external validation of current risk prediction models of diabetes remission at 1 year after SG. Seven models showed excellent predicting power, and scoring models were recommended more because of their easy utility.
Authors: Karen J Coleman; Sebastien Haneuse; Eric Johnson; Andy Bogart; David Fisher; Patrick J O'Connor; Nancy E Sherwood; Steve Sidney; Mary Kay Theis; Jane Anau; Emily B Schroeder; Rebecca O'Brien; David Arterburn Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Ali Aminian; Claire E Pothier; Esther S H Kim; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Simona Panunzi; Lena Carlsson; Andrea De Gaetano; Markku Peltonen; Toni Rice; Lars Sjöström; Geltrude Mingrone; John B Dixon Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: R Zhang; O Borisenko; I Telegina; J Hargreaves; A R Ahmed; R Sanchez Santos; C Pring; P Funch-Jensen; B Dillemans; J L Hedenbro Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Kajsa Sjöholm; Lena M S Carlsson; Magdalena Taube; Carel W le Roux; Per-Arne Svensson; Markku Peltonen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Izabela A Karpińska; Jan Kulawik; Magdalena Pisarska-Adamczyk; Michał Wysocki; Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Major Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Francesco Rubino; Ricardo V Cohen; Geltrude Mingrone; Carel W le Roux; Jeffrey I Mechanick; David E Arterburn; Josep Vidal; George Alberti; Stephanie A Amiel; Rachel L Batterham; Stefan Bornstein; Ghassan Chamseddine; Stefano Del Prato; John B Dixon; Robert H Eckel; David Hopkins; Barbara M McGowan; An Pan; Ameet Patel; François Pattou; Philip R Schauer; Paul Z Zimmet; David E Cummings Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Kajsa Sjöholm; Per-Arne Svensson; Magdalena Taube; Peter Jacobson; Johanna C Andersson-Assarsson; Lena M S Carlsson; Markku Peltonen Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Izabela A Karpińska; Joanna Choma; Michał Wysocki; Alicja Dudek; Piotr Małczak; Magdalena Szopa; Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Major Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 2.895