Lan Liu1, Chenghao Li2, Yuan Huang2, Haiyan Jin3. 1. Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China. 3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji, 133000, China. jinhyyj@msn.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: There is controversy regarding the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for prophylaxis against endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) postoperative pancreatitis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of NSAIDs for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Selected RCTs were pooled under a fixed effects model to generate the relative risks (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs involving a total of 5031 patients (2555 in the intervention group and 2476 in the control group) were selected. Overall, NSAIDs were associated with a significant reduction in risk of PEP (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.64, I2 = 40.4%) and moderate to severe PEP (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67, I2 = 0%) compared with the control group. Subgroup analyses were performed according to route of administration (rectal or other), type of NSAIDs (diclofenac, indomethacin, or other), timing of administration (pre-ERCP, post-ERCP, or other), and patient population (high risk or general). Subgroup analyses showed difference in clinical efficacy of NSAID prophylaxis regardless of route, timing, or specific type of NSAID. CONCLUSION: NSAIDs were associated with a significant reduction in risk of PEP and moderate to severe PEP compared to the control group.
BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: There is controversy regarding the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for prophylaxis against endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) postoperative pancreatitis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of NSAIDs for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Selected RCTs were pooled under a fixed effects model to generate the relative risks (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs involving a total of 5031 patients (2555 in the intervention group and 2476 in the control group) were selected. Overall, NSAIDs were associated with a significant reduction in risk of PEP (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.64, I2 = 40.4%) and moderate to severe PEP (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67, I2 = 0%) compared with the control group. Subgroup analyses were performed according to route of administration (rectal or other), type of NSAIDs (diclofenac, indomethacin, or other), timing of administration (pre-ERCP, post-ERCP, or other), and patient population (high risk or general). Subgroup analyses showed difference in clinical efficacy of NSAID prophylaxis regardless of route, timing, or specific type of NSAID. CONCLUSION: NSAIDs were associated with a significant reduction in risk of PEP and moderate to severe PEP compared to the control group.
Authors: E Masci; G Toti; A Mariani; S Curioni; A Lomazzi; M Dinelli; G Minoli; C Crosta; U Comin; A Fertitta; A Prada; G R Passoni; P A Testoni Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Peter B Cotton; Valerie Durkalski; Joseph Romagnuolo; Qi Pauls; Evan Fogel; Paul Tarnasky; Giuseppe Aliperti; Martin Freeman; Richard Kozarek; Priya Jamidar; Mel Wilcox; Jose Serrano; Olga Brawman-Mintzer; Grace Elta; Patrick Mauldin; Andre Thornhill; Robert Hawes; April Wood-Williams; Kyle Orrell; Douglas Drossman; Patricia Robuck Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Zoltán Döbrönte; Zoltán Szepes; Ferenc Izbéki; Judit Gervain; László Lakatos; Gyula Pécsi; Miklós Ihász; Lilla Lakner; Erzsébet Toldy; László Czakó Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Christina J Sperna Weiland; Xavier J N M Smeets; Robert C Verdonk; Alexander C Poen; Abha Bhalla; Niels G Venneman; Wietske Kievit; Hester C Timmerhuis; Devica S Umans; Jeanin E van Hooft; Marc G Besselink; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Paul Fockens; Marco J Bruno; Joost P H Drenth; Erwin J M van Geenen Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2022-03-14
Authors: Yin Shou-Xin; Han Shuai; Kong Fan-Guo; Dao Xing-Yuan; Huang Jia-Guo; Peng Tao; Qi Lin; Shang Yan-Sheng; Yang Ting-Ting; Zhao Jing; Li Fang; Qi Hao-Liang; Liu Man Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 1.817