| Literature DB >> 30250514 |
Amira A Moawad1,2, Helmut Hotzel1, Heinrich Neubauer1, Ralf Ehricht3,4, Stefan Monecke3,4,5, Herbert Tomaso1, Hafez M Hafez6, Uwe Roesler7, Hosny El-Adawy1,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poultry remains one of the most important reservoir for zoonotic multidrug resistant pathogens. The global rise of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria is of reasonable concern and demands intensified surveillance.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Broiler; Colistin; DNA microarray; ESBL; Enterobacteriaceae
Year: 2018 PMID: 30250514 PMCID: PMC6148799 DOI: 10.1186/s13099-018-0266-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Pathog ISSN: 1757-4749 Impact factor: 4.181
Overview about investigated poultry farms and the number of collected samples
| Governorate | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dakahlia | Sharkiya | Gharbiya | Damietta | Kafr El-Sheikh | ||
| No. of farms | 20 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 48 |
| No. of birds | 58,000 | 18,000 | 12,000 | 28,000 | 28,000 | 144,000 |
| No. of samples | 232 | 72 | 48 | 112 | 112 | 576 |
Antibiotic susceptibility of 56 Escherichia coli isolates from broilers using broth microdilution test
| Antibiotic | Class | S | I | R | Resistance rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin (PEN) | β-Lactam | 0 | 1 | 55 | 98.2 |
| Erythromycin (ERY) | Macrolide | 1 | 1 | 54 | 96.4 |
| Rifampicin (RAM) | Ansamycin | 1 | 1 | 54 | 96.4 |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (T/S) | Diaminopyrimidine/sulfonamide | 19 | 1 | 36 | 64.3 |
| Streptomycin (STR) | Aminoglycoside | 12 | 14 | 30 | 53.6 |
| Tetracycline (TET) | Tetracycline | 24 | 4 | 28 | 50.0 |
| Ceftazidime (CAZ) | β-Lactam (cephalosporin) | 24 | 9 | 23 | 41.1 |
| Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) | β-Lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor | 29 | 12 | 15 | 26.8 |
| Chloramphenicol (CMP) | Non-classified | 41 | 2 | 13 | 23.2 |
| Ciprofloxacin (CIP) | Fluoroquinolone | 38 | 6 | 12 | 21.4 |
| Gentamicin (GEN) | Aminoglycoside | 38 | 7 | 11 | 19.6 |
| Levofloxacin (LEV) | Fluoroquinolone | 35 | 13 | 8 | 14.3 |
| Amikacin (AMK) | Aminoglycoside | 43 | 7 | 6 | 10.7 |
| Imipenem (IMP) | β-Lactam (carbapenem) | 48 | 7 | 1 | 1.8 |
S susceptible, I intermediate, R resistant
Antibiotic susceptibility of 9 Enterobacteriaceae isolates other than E. coli from broilers using broth microdilution test
| Antibiotic | Resistance rate (%) | Resistance rate (%) | Resistance rate (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | I | R | S | I | R | S | I | R | ||||
| Penicillin (PEN) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Erythromycin (ERY) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Rifampicin (RAM) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (T/S) | 2 | 0 | 3 | 60.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Streptomycin (STR) | 1 | 0 | 4 | 80.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Tetracycline (TET) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20.0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Ceftazidime (CAZ) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) | 1 | 0 | 4 | 80.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Chloramphenicol (CMP) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Ciprofloxacin (CIP) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Gentamicin (GEN) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Levofloxacin (LEV) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
| Amikacin (AMK) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Imipenem (IMP) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
S susceptible, I intermediate, R resistant
Characterization of colistin-resistant and carbapenemase-producing E. coli isolates
| Isolate | Governorate | Farm | O-antigen | H-antigen | Resistance genes | Virulence genes | Phenotypic resistance | MIC value | ESBL | Carbapenemase | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16CS0744 | Dakahliya | 9 | – | 51 | CIP, T/S, TET, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN, AMP, CAZ | + | ≥ 4 | Positive | Negative | ||
| 16CS0078 | Dakahliya | 16/2 | – | 4 | T/S, TET, RAM, STR, ERY, PEN | + | ≥ 6 | nd by VITEK | nd by VITEK | ||
| 16CS0075 | Kafr El-Sheikh | 9 | – | 51 | CIP, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN | + | ≥ 32 | Negative | Negative | ||
| 16CS0775 | Damietta | 4 | – | 4 | – | TET, RAM, ERY, PEN | + | ≥ 6 | nd by VITEK | nd by VITEK | |
| 16CS0036 | Damietta | 6 | – | 21 | – | RAM, ERY, PEN, AMC | + | ≥ 4 | nd by VITEK | nd by VITEK | |
| 16CS0747 | Gharbiya | 4 | – | 32 | T/S, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN AMP, CAZ | − | nd | Positive | Positive |
Genoserotypes and resistance profiles of Escherichia coli isolates possessed resistance genes from different farms in four districts in Egypt
| District | Isolate | O-type | H-type | Virulence genes | Resistance genes | Phenotypic resistance | ESBL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dakahliya (n = 7) | 16CS0049 | – | 5 | TET, RAM, ERY, PEN | |||
| 16CS0070 | – | 51 | CIP, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN | ||||
| 16CS0071 | – | 21 | CIP, LEV, T/S, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN, AMP, CAZ | + | |||
| 16CS0078 | – | 4 | T/S, TET, RAM, STR, ERY, PEN | ||||
| 16CS0740 | – | 26 | CIP, T/S, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN, AMP | + | |||
| 16CS0744 | – | 51 | CIP, T/S, TET, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN, AMP, CAZ | ||||
| 16CS0772 | – | 51 | CIP, T/S, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN, AMP, CAZ | + | |||
| Damietta (n = 3) | 16CS0069 | – | 51 | CIP, LEV, T/S, CMP, RAM, STR, ERY, PEN, AMP | |||
| 16CS0743 | – | 51 | CIP, T/S, TET, CMP, RAM, STR, ERY, PEN | ||||
| 16CS0752 | – | 6 | not determined | ||||
| Gharbiya (n = 3) | 16CS0747 | – | 32 | T/S, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN AMP, CAZ | + | ||
| 16CS0761 | – | 51 | CIP, LEV, T/S, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN, AMP | + | |||
| 16CS0762 | – | 51 | not determined | ||||
| Kafr El-sheikh (n = 4) | 16CS0067 | 15 | 1 | T/S, TET, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN | |||
| 16CS0075 | – | 51 | CIP, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN | ||||
| 16CS0755 | – | 10 | CIP, LEV, T/S, TET, CMP, RAM, GEN, STR, ERY, PEN, AMP, CAZ | + | |||
| 16CS0774 | – | 1 | T/S, TET, RAM, STR, ERY, PEN, AMP, CAZ | + |
Results of antimicrobial resistance testing using VITEK-2 system
| Isolate | PIP | TZP | CTX | CAZ | FEB | ATM | IMP | MEM | AMK | GEN | TOB | CIP | MXF | TGC | FOS | CT | T/S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16CS0049 | R | I | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | I | R | S | S | S | S | No ESBL |
| 16CS0070 | R | I | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | No ESBL |
| 16CS0071 | R | I | R | R | I | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | S | S | S | R | ESBL |
| 16CS0075 | R | I | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | S | S | R | S | No ESBL |
| 16CS0743 | R | I | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | S | R | No ESBL |
| 16CS0744 | R | I | R | R | I | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | S | S | R | R | ESBL |
| 16CS0747 | R | R | R | R | I | R | I | I | S | R | R | I | R | S | S | S | S | ESBL/Carba |
| 16CS0761 | R | I | R | I | I | I | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | S | S | S | R | ESBL |
| 16CS0772 | R | R | R | R | I | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | S | S | S | R | ESBL |
| 16CS0774 | R | I | I | R | I | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | ESBL |
| 16CS0067 | R | I | S | S | S | S | S | S | I | R | R | S | R | S | S | S | R | No ESBL |
| 16CS0740 | R | I | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | S | S | S | R | No ESBL |
| 16CS0755 | R | I | R | R | I | R | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | I | S | S | R | ESBL |
PIP piperacillin, TZP piperacillin/tazobactam, CTX cefotaxime, CAZ ceftazidime, FEB cefepime, ATM aztreonam, IMP imipenem, MEM meropenem, AMK amikacin, GEN gentamicin, TOB tobramycin, CIP ciprofloxacin, MXF moxifloxacin, TGC tigecycline, FOS fosfomycin, CT colistin, T/S trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole