| Literature DB >> 30250469 |
Xuerui Zhang1,2, Lina Huo1, Lulu Song1, Zhaoqing Hu1, Xinran Wang1, Yuheng Han1, Ying Wang1,2, Peipei Xu3, Jing Zhang1,2, Zi-Chun Hua1,2,4.
Abstract
Intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) play a critical role in mucosal immune system, which differ from thymus-derived cells and develop locally in gut. Although the development of IELs has been studied in some detail, the molecular cues controlling their local development remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that FADD, a classic adaptor protein required for death-receptor-induced apoptosis, is a critical regulator of the intestinal IEL development. The mice with a dominant negative mutant of FADD (FADD-DN) display an abnormal development of intestinal IELs with a marked reduction in the numbers of CD8αα+TCRγδ+ T cells. As a precursor for CD8αα+ development, lamina propria lymphocytes in lin-negative expression (lin- LPLs) were analyzed and the massive accumulation of IL-7R-lin- LPLs was observed in FADD-DN mice. As IL-7R is one of Notch1-target genes, we further observed that the level of Notch1 expression was lower in Lin- LPLs from FADD-DN mice compared with normal mice. The downregulation of Notch1 expression induced by FADD-DN overexpression was also confirmed in Jurkat T cells. Considering that IL-7 and its receptor IL7-R play a differentiation inducing role in the development of intestinal IELs, the influence of FADD via its DD domain on Notch1 expression might be a possible molecular signal involved in the early IELs development. In addition, loss of γδ T-IELs in FADD-DN mice aggravates DSS-induced colitis, suggesting that FADD is a relevant contribution to the field of mucosal immunology and intestinal homeostasis.Entities:
Keywords: DSS-induced colitis; FADD; LPLs; mucosal immune system; γδ+ T-IELs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30250469 PMCID: PMC6139313 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Loss of γδ T cells in FADD-DN transgenic mice. (A) The three-dimensional structures of FADD [Protein Data Bank (PDB); accession number: 2GF5] and FADD-DN (death domain of FADD). (B) Western blot analysis of FADD expression in mesenteric lymph nodes from wild type (WT) and FADD-DN mice. (C) Total IEL numbers of wild type and FADD-DN mice, calculated from six mice per group. Each dot represents one mouse experimental of each group. The solid horizontal lines indicate mean value of each group. (D) IELs from WT and FADD-DN mice were stained by Abs to TCRαβ and TCRγδ. The percentage for γδ IELs (TCRγδ+ TCRαβ−) and αβ IELs (TCRγδ− TCRαβ+) were displayed in the appropriate quadrant. Statistic analysis of γδ IELs and αβ IELs from indicated groups (n = 6 per group) on the right. Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. ***P < 0.001. (E) IELs from WT and FADD-DN mice were stained by Abs to CD8α and TCRγδ for FACS analysis. Statistic analysis of CD8α+TCRγδ+ IELs from indicated groups (n = 6 per group) on the right. Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. ****P < 0.0001. (F) Immunofluorescent staining of γδ and αβ IELs in intestinal histological sections from WT and FADD-DN mice (n > 3 per group). Representative data from at least 3 mice per group is shown.
Figure 2Selective deficiency of CD8αα+γδ T cells in FADD-DN mice. (A) Representative FACS analysis of CD8αα+ (CD8α+CD8β−) and CD8αβ+ (CD8α+CD8β+) populations in the IELs from WT and FADD-DN mice. Statistical analysis of CD8αα+ and CD8αβ+IELs from indicated groups (n = 6 per group) is on the right. Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. **P < 0.01. (B) CD8αα+ cells gated from (A) were analyzed for the expression of TCRαβ and TCRγδ, distinguished into two subsets: CD8αα+ αβT (CD8αα+TCRαβ+TCRγδ−) and CD8αα+ γδT (CD8αα+TCRαβ−TCRγδ+). (C) CD8αβ+ cells gated from (A) were analyzed for the expression of TCRαβ and TCRγδ, distinguished into two subsets: CD8αβ+αβT (CD8αβ+TCRαβ+TCRγδ−) and CD8αβ+ γδ T (CD8αβ+TCRαβ−TCRγδ+). (D) Statistic analysis of the percentages of indicated subsets among total IELs from WT and FADD-DN mice (n = 6 per group). Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. *P < 0.05. (E) Time-dependent changes of the percentage of CD8αα+TCRγδ+ subset in the IELs from WT and FADD-DN mice analyzed by FACS. Error bars reflect S.E.M. (n = 3 per group). (F) Time-dependent changes of the percentage of CD8αα+TCRβ+ subset in the IELs from WT and FADD-DN mice analyzed by FACS. Error bars reflect S.E.M. (n = 3 per group). Data was calculated from three mice per group.
Figure 3The effect of FADD-DN on intestinal IELs development. (A) Representative FACS analysis of thymus from wild type and FADD-DN mice (n = 5 per group). Thymocytes were stained by Abs to CD4 and CD8. Statistical analysis of the subsets of CD4+CD8+, CD4+CD8−, CD4−CD8+, and CD4−CD8− thymocytes from indicated groups is shown on the right. Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. (B) CD4−CD8− T cells of thymus were gated from (A) and then analyzed for the markers of TCRγδ and TCRαβ. Representative FACS analysis on the left and statistical analysis of percentages of CD4−CD8− γδ T cells (CD4−CD8− TCRαβ−TCRγδ+) on the right (n = 5 per group). Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. (C) Total IELs numbers of WT and FADD-DN mice before or after thymectomy. The changes of total IEL numbers between control and thymecomized mice are shown in the statistical analysis (n = 4 per group). Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. (D) IELs from WT and FADD-DN mice were obtained 4 weeks after thymectomy. Flow cytometry was performed to analyze the percentage of CD8α+TCRγδ+ populations stained by Abs to CD8α and TCRγδ. (E) The percentages of CD8α+TCRγδ+ subset among total IELs from indicated group(n = 4 per group). Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Figure 4The development of IELs arrested by FADD-DN in Lin− LPLs with IL-7R deficiency. (A) IELs from WT and FADD-DN mice were labeled with a mixture of mAbs recognizing mature hematopoietic cells to gate Lin− populations as described in methods. FACS plots show the gating strategy for the population of Lin− IELs. Statistic analysis of Lin− IELs from indicated groups (n = 3 per group) is shown on the right. Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. *P < 0.05. (B) The Lin− IELs gated from (A) were labeled with antibody to CD8α. Histograms show the expression level of CD8α in Lin− IELs from indicated mice. Statistic analysis of CD8α+ subset in Lin− IEL from indicated groups (n = 3 per group) is shown on the right, Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. **P < 0.01. (C) LPLs from WT and FADD-DN mice were stained with antibodies against lineage markers (Lin).FACS plots show the gating strategy for Lin− LPL populations. Statistic analysis for Lin− LPLs on the right (n = 3 per group). Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. *P < 0.05. (D) The Lin− LPLs gated from (C) were labeled with antibody to Notch1. Histograms show two levels of Notch1 expression in Lin− LPLs indicated as Notch1high and Notch1low. Statistic analysis for Notch1high Lin− LPLs on the right (n = 3 per group). Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. *P < 0.05. (E) Jurkat T cell were transiently transfected with FADD-DN expression vector. The level of NICD (cleaved Notch1) was detected by western blot. (F)The Lin− LPLs gated from (C) were labeled with anti-CD117and anti-CD127 Abs. Note: CD117 as c-kit and CD127 as IL-7R. Statistical analysis of the percentages of CD127+ LPLs on the right (n = 4 per group), Each dot represents one mouse of each experimental group. **P < 0.01.
Figure 5More severe DSS-induced colitis in FADD-DN mice. Mice (n = 6 per group) were given 3% DSS in their drinking water for 5 days and then provided with water for 1 day before being sacrificed. Macroscopic appearances (A) and colon lengths (B) were measured in indicated groups. (C) Body weights of mice in each group (n = 6 per group) were recorded daily. The changes of body weights induced by DSS-induced colitis were shown in the percentage of the original body weight. (D) Disease activity index (DAI) was calculated as described in the material and methods section. (E) Colon sections of indicated groups with H&E staining. The original amplification was 100×. (F) Histological scores of colon sections were calculated as described in the Materials and methods. (G) Serum levels of cytokines in different groups detected by ELISA. Data shown here are from a representative experiment repeated three times with similar results. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. DSS-treated vehicle group.