Literature DB >> 30249558

Lesion size determines diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA with onsite cytopathologic evaluation for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.

Tan Attila1, Özlem Aydın2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield and factors influencing the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial lesions (SELs) with rapid onsite cytopathologic evaluation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study.
RESULTS: Among 22 patients who underwent EUS-FNA, a cytopathological diagnosis was reached in 16 (72.7%) patients. The EUS-FNA results were as follows: seven GISTs (31.8%), six leiomyomas (27.2%), four non-diagnostics (18%), two duplication cysts (9%), two spindle cell tumor (9%), and one ectopic pancreas (4.5%). The long-axis size was > 20 mm in 12 patients (average size: 31.3 ±9.3 mm) and < 20 mm (average size: 16.6 ±2.5 mm) in 10 patients. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA from lesions < 20 mm was 50% (5/10 lesions), and of lesions > 20 mm was 91.6% (11/12 lesions) (Fisher's exact test; p=0.028). Six patients underwent surgical resection. Surgical pathology results of five lesions (four GIST, one leiomyoma) were consistent with cytopathology results (83.3%).
CONCLUSION: The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of the upper GI SELs with an onsite cytopathologic interpretation was 72.7%. Lesion size < 2 cm significantly reduces the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for the upper GI SELs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30249558      PMCID: PMC6284628          DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1300-4948            Impact factor:   1.852


  6 in total

1.  Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-assisted tissue acquisition for subepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suprabhat Giri; Shivaraj Afzalpurkar; Sumaswi Angadi; Sridhar Sundaram
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-08-04

Review 2.  Advancements in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.

Authors:  Osamu Goto; Mitsuru Kaise; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 4.519

3.  Clinical efficacy and safety of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amaninder Dhaliwal; Sindhura Kolli; Banreet Singh Dhindsa; Kalpit Devani; Daryl Ramai; Harlan Sayles; Rajani Rangray; Ishfaq Bhat; Shailender Singh; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02-14

Review 4.  The Diagnosis of Small Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy.

Authors:  Masanari Sekine; Takeharu Asano; Hirosato Mashima
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25

5.  Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges.

Authors:  Benedetto Mangiavillano; Leonardo Frazzoni; Thomas Togliani; Carlo Fabbri; Ilaria Tarantino; Luca De Luca; Teresa Staiano; Cecilia Binda; Marianna Signoretti; Leonardo H Eusebi; Francesco Auriemma; Laura Lamonaca; Danilo Paduano; Milena Di Leo; Silvia Carrara; Lorenzo Fuccio; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

6.  Diagnostic yield of deep biopsy via endoscopic submucosal dissection for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amaninder Dhaliwal; Sindhura Kolli; Banreet Singh Dhindsa; Harmeet Singh Mashiana; Neil Bhogal; Ishfaq Bhat; Shailender Singh; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.