Background No data are available on the feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivered by trained key population (KP) community health workers. Herein we report data from the KP-led Princess PrEP program serving men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in Thailand. METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2017, trained MSM and TGW community health workers delivered same-day PrEP service in community health centres, allowing clients to receive one PrEP bottle to start on the day of HIV-negative testing. Visits were scheduled at Months 1 and 3, and every 3 months thereafter. Uptake, retention and adherence to PrEP services and changes in risk behaviours over time are reported. RESULTS: Of 1467 MSM and 230 TGW who started PrEP, 44.1% had had condomless sex in the past 3 months. At Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12, retention was 74.2%, 64.0%, 56.2%, 46.7% and 43.9% respectively (lower in TGW than MSM at all visits; P<0.001), with adherence to at least four PrEP pills per week self-reported by 97.4%, 96.8%, 96.5%, 97.5% and 99.5% of respondents respectively (no difference between MSM and TGW). Logistic regression analysis identified age >25 years, being MSM and having at least a Bachelors degree significantly increased retention. Condomless sex did not change over the 12-month period (from 47.2% to 45.2%; P=0.20). New syphilis was diagnosed in 4.9% and 3.0% of PrEP clients at Months 6 and 12 (cf. 7.0% at baseline; P=0.007). Among PrEP adherers and non-adherers, there were one and six HIV cases of seroconversion respectively, which resulted in corresponding HIV incidence rates (95% confidence interval) of 0.27 (0.04-1.90) and 1.36 (0.61-3.02) per 100 person-years. CONCLUSION: Our KP-led PrEP program successfully delivered PrEP to MSM and TGW. Innovative retention supports are needed, especially for TGW and those who are young or with lower education levels. To scale-up and sustain KP-led PrEP programs, strong endorsement from international and national guidelines is necessary.
Background No data are available on the feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivered by trained key population (KP) community health workers. Herein we report data from the KP-led Princess PrEP program serving men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in Thailand. METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2017, trained MSM and TGW community health workers delivered same-day PrEP service in community health centres, allowing clients to receive one PrEP bottle to start on the day of HIV-negative testing. Visits were scheduled at Months 1 and 3, and every 3 months thereafter. Uptake, retention and adherence to PrEP services and changes in risk behaviours over time are reported. RESULTS: Of 1467 MSM and 230 TGW who started PrEP, 44.1% had had condomless sex in the past 3 months. At Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12, retention was 74.2%, 64.0%, 56.2%, 46.7% and 43.9% respectively (lower in TGW than MSM at all visits; P<0.001), with adherence to at least four PrEP pills per week self-reported by 97.4%, 96.8%, 96.5%, 97.5% and 99.5% of respondents respectively (no difference between MSM and TGW). Logistic regression analysis identified age >25 years, being MSM and having at least a Bachelors degree significantly increased retention. Condomless sex did not change over the 12-month period (from 47.2% to 45.2%; P=0.20). New syphilis was diagnosed in 4.9% and 3.0% of PrEP clients at Months 6 and 12 (cf. 7.0% at baseline; P=0.007). Among PrEP adherers and non-adherers, there were one and six HIV cases of seroconversion respectively, which resulted in corresponding HIV incidence rates (95% confidence interval) of 0.27 (0.04-1.90) and 1.36 (0.61-3.02) per 100 person-years. CONCLUSION: Our KP-led PrEP program successfully delivered PrEP to MSM and TGW. Innovative retention supports are needed, especially for TGW and those who are young or with lower education levels. To scale-up and sustain KP-led PrEP programs, strong endorsement from international and national guidelines is necessary.
Authors: Chen Zhang; James McMahon; Kevin Fiscella; Sarahmona Przybyla; Amy Braksmajer; Natalie LeBlanc; Yu Liu Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Brian W Weir; Chen Dun; Andrea L Wirtz; Sandra Hsu Hnin Mon; Noor Qaragholi; Tareerat Chemnasiri; Sarika Pattanasin; Wichuda Sukwicha; Anchalee Varangrat; Eileen F Dunne; Timothy H Holtz; Surang Janyam; Harry Jin; Danai Linjongrat; Philip A Mock; Michael C Thigpen; James F Rooney; Patrick S Sullivan; Andrew C Hickey; Pachara Sirivongrangson; Chris Beyrer Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 6.996
Authors: Jing Zhang; Chunyan Li; Junjie Xu; Zhili Hu; Sarah E Rutstein; Joseph D Tucker; Jason J Ong; Yongjun Jiang; Wenqing Geng; Sarah T Wright; Myron S Cohen; Hong Shang; Weiming Tang Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 16.070
Authors: Sushena Reza-Paul; Lisa Lazarus; Raviprakash Maiya; Partha Haldar; B B Rewari; M S Venugopal; Syed Hafeez Ur Rahman; K T Venukumar; Manjula Ramaiah; Akram Pasha; Mukta Sharma; Richard Steen; Robert Lorway Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2020-02-18