Literature DB >> 30249284

A novel candidate species of Anaplasma that infects avian erythrocytes.

Ralph Eric Thijl Vanstreels1,2, Michael J Yabsley3,4, Nola J Parsons5, Liandrie Swanepoel4, Pierre A Pistorius6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anaplasma spp. are Gram-negative obligate intracellular bacteria transmitted by ticks. Even though numerous studies have detected DNA from Anaplasma spp. in the blood of birds, thus far mammals were the only vertebrates demonstrated to serve as competent hosts to these organisms. We report a novel candidate species of Anasplasma that was associated with cytoplasmic inclusions in the erythrocytes of an African penguin (Spheniscus demersus) in South Africa.
METHODS: Cytoplasmic inclusions were morphologically characterized from freshly-produced blood smears, and phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA and groEL genes were used to evaluate the evolutionary relationships of the organism to other Anaplasmataceae.
RESULTS: Dark-purple round or oval inclusions consistent with Anaplasmataceae morulae were observed in the cytoplasm of erythrocytes. Phylogenetic trees produced using different methods agreed that the organism detected in this study belongs to the genus Anaplasma, and suggested that it is most closely related to the cluster comprising A. centrale, A. capra, A. marginale and A. ovis. We propose provisionally naming the strain detected in this study as "Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci".
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first species of Anaplasma shown to produce cytoplasmic inclusions in avian cells, opening the possibility that cytoplasmic inclusions in avian erythrocytes that had previously been attributed to Aegyptianella sp. might in fact correspond to Anaplasma. Further studies on the molecular biology of avian-infecting Anaplasmataceae will be valuable to provide insight into the evolution and epidemiology of these organisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA and groEL genes; African penguin (Spheniscus demersus); Avian erythrocytes; Phylogeny; South Africa; “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci”

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30249284      PMCID: PMC6154407          DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3089-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasit Vectors        ISSN: 1756-3305            Impact factor:   3.876


Background

Anaplasmataceae (Alphaproteobacteria: Rickettsiales) are Gram-negative obligate intracellular bacteria found exclusively within membrane-bound inclusions or vacuoles in the cytoplasm of vertebrate and invertebrate host cells [1]. This family comprises five recognized genera (Aegyptianella, Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, Neorickettsia and Wolbachia) [1], and four candidate genera (“Candidatus Cryptoplasma”, “Candidatus Neoehrlichia”, “Candidatus Xenohaliotis”, and “Candidatus Xenolissoclinum”) [2-5]. The genus Anaplasma currently includes nine species, six candidate species as well as numerous unclassified species, all of which are either known or believed to be tick-borne (Table 1). Depending on the involved species, these organisms infect the cytoplasm of blood cells (erythrocytes, leukocytes or platelets), bone marrow precursor cells, or endothelial cells of vertebrates, forming pleomorphic clusters of bacteria (morulae) [6]. Mammals are the only vertebrates demonstrated thus far to be competent hosts of Anaplasma spp., but numerous studies have detected DNA from Anaplasma spp. (especially A. phagocytophilum) in the blood of birds and in the tissues of ticks collected from birds [7-11]. However, no studies demonstrated the presence of Anaplasma spp. cytoplasmic inclusions within blood cells of birds, and it was therefore considered unclear whether these organisms are able to infect avian cells or merely remain viable in the avian plasma [10, 12].
Table 1

Overview of the species and candidate species of the genus Anaplasma [1, 41–54]

SpeciesTick hostVertebrate hostHost cells
Anaplasma bovis Haemaphysalis, Rhipicephalus, AmblyommaDomestic and wild ruminants, small mammalsMonocytes
Anaplasma capra Haemaphysalis Domestic and wild ruminants, humansNot known
Anaplasma caudatum Not knownDomestic and wild ruminantsErythrocytes
Anaplasma centrale Ixodes, HaemaphysalisDomestic and wild ruminantsErythrocytes
Anaplasma marginale Ixodes, DermacentorDomestic ruminantsErythrocytes
Anaplasma odocoilei Not knownWild ruminantsPlatelets
Anaplasma ovis Dermacentor, Hyalomma, Rhipicephalus Domestic and wild ruminants, humansErythrocytes
Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ixodes, Dermacentor, Hyalomma, RhipicephalusDomestic and wild ruminants, horses, dogs, cats, rabbits, rodents, insectivores, wild swine, humansGranulocytes
Anaplasma platys Rhipicephalus Dogs, camelsPlatelets
Candidatus Anaplasma boleense” Hyalomma Not knownNot known
Candidatus Anaplasma camelii”Not knownCamelsNot known
Candidatus Anaplasma corsicanum”Not knownDomestic ruminantsNot known
Candidatus Anaplasma ivorensis” Amblyomma Not knownNot known
Candidatus Anaplasma mediterraneum”Not knownDomestic ruminantsNot known
Candidatus Anaplasma rodmosense”Not knownRatsNot known
Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci”aNot knownAfrican penguinsErythrocytes

aProposed in this study

Overview of the species and candidate species of the genus Anaplasma [1, 41–54] aProposed in this study On the other hand, cytoplasmic inclusions observed in the erythrocytes of birds have been traditionally attributed to members of the genus Aegyptianella. Currently the only recognized species of Aegyptianella is the avian-infecting Aegyptianella pullorum [13, 14], and the validity of other proposed Aegyptianella spp. remains unclear and the genus has been considered incertae sedis [1, 13, 15]. Aegyptianella pullorum infects the cytoplasm of erythrocytes forming pleomorphic inclusions with a diameter ranging between 0.3–4.0 μm, and has been demonstrated to infect chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese and quails [13, 16, 17]. A previous genetic study revealed that Ae. pullorum from turkeys is closely related to Anaplasma [17], leading some authors to suggest that Ae. pullorum should be reclassified as an Anaplasma [18, 19], but currently there is no consensus on this suggestion [20]. In this study, we describe a novel candidate species of Anaplasma that is associated with cytoplasmic inclusions in the erythrocytes of the African penguin (Spheniscus demersus), and discuss the phylogenetic relationships of this organism to other Anaplasmataceae.

Methods

The Southern African Foundation for the Conservation of Coastal Birds (SANCCOB) facility in Cape Town (33°50'02"S 18°29'29"E) receives and rehabilitates oiled, sick, and injured marine and coastal birds along the coast of South Africa. Cytoplasmic inclusions consistent with Anasplasmataceae were observed in the erythrocytes of an adult African penguin during the examination of blood smears as a part of routine veterinary checks. The individual history of the studied penguin is summarized in Additional file 1. Blood was obtained from the tarsal vein and thin blood smears were freshly prepared, fixed and stained with a modified Wright-Giemsa stain (Kyro-Quick, Kyron Laboratories, Benrose, South Africa). The percentage of erythrocytes with inclusions was estimated with manual counts of erythrocytic inclusions and software-assisted counts of c.2000 erythrocytes; erythrocytes were counted from photographs of 20 randomly-selected microscope fields under 1000× magnification using ImageJ 1.46r [21, 22]. ImageJ 1.46r was also used to measure the width of cytoplasmic inclusions. The following morphological characteristics were recorded for 100 erythrocytic inclusions: position (polar, subpolar, median), contact with host cell margins (contact with outer margin, contact with nuclear margin, no contact with margins), and the presence of adjacent indentation of host cell outer margin (present, absent). DNA was extracted from frozen blood using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. A 927 bp segment of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primers 8F and 1492R [23]. A 939 bp segment of the groEL gene was amplified using a nested PCR with the primary primers HS1 and HS6 and secondary primers HS43 and HSVR [24, 25]. Amplification products were sequenced using Sanger bidirectional sequencing. MegaBLAST [26] was used to identify publicly-available sequences that were highly similar to those obtained in this study. Phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA and groEL genes were conducted to compare sequences obtained in this study to publicly-available sequences of Anaplasmataceae (Additional file 2: Table S1). Sequences were aligned using ClustalW [27] as implemented in MEGA 7 [28]. General Time Reversible model with invariant sites and gamma distribution (GTR+I+G) was used for both genes as recommended by jModelTest 2.1.10 [29]. Neighbor-Joining trees (maximum composite likelihood, including transitions and transversions) and Maximum Likelihood trees (nearest neighbor interchange) were produced using MEGA 7; bootstrap values were calculated from 5000 replicates. Bayesian trees (two simultaneous Markov chains, 5 million generations, sampling every 1000 generations) were produced using MrBayes 3.2.6 [30]; posterior probabilities were calculated after discarding the first 25% trees as a ‘burn-in’ step. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted separately for each gene and also for concatenated (Neighbor-Joining and Maximum Likelihood) or partitioned (Bayesian) sequences of the two genes.

Results

Dark-purple round or oval inclusions consistent with Anaplasmataceae morulae were observed in the cytoplasm of 0.10% of the erythrocytes (Fig. 1). In most cases these inclusions had a dense and homogeneous texture with a slightly paler center (e.g. Fig. 1f), but in some cases it was possible to identify irregularly distributed dense dots or crescent-shaped areas (e.g. Fig 1j and 1l). The inclusions (n = 100) had a width of 2.28 ± 0.56 μm (range: 1.02–3.33 μm), and were positioned as follows: 46% polar (e.g. Fig. 1g), 39% subpolar (e.g. Fig. 1k), and 15% median (e.g. Fig. 1d). Most of the inclusions (75%) appeared to be in contact with the outer margins of the host cell (e.g. Fig. 1j), 7% appeared to be in contact with the host cell nucleus (e.g. Fig. 1l), and 18% did not appear to be in direct contact with any host cell margins (e.g. Fig. 1e). The outer margins of the host cell were deformed and a small indentation was visible in 63% of the erythrocytes where inclusions were in direct contact with the host cell outer margin (e.g. Fig. 1d and i). In addition to the erythrocytic inclusions, one lymphocyte contained dark-purple cytoplasmic inclusions (Additional file 3: Figure S1); however, despite extensive searching (> 1000 leukocytes examined), no other leukocytes or thrombocytes were seen with similar cytoplasmic inclusions and it was therefore not possible to determine the identity of these structures.
Fig. 1

Cytoplasmic inclusions attributed to “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci” in the erythrocytes of an African penguin (Spheniscus demersus). Modified Wright-Giemsa stain. Inclusions ranged in size from small dots (a, b) to pleomorphic structures that were smaller than the host cell nucleus (c-l) and were found at a polar (a, e-h), subpolar (b, i-l) or median position (c, d), at times touching the host cell outer margins (c-e, g-k) or the host cell nucleus (l). Scale-bar: 5 μm

Cytoplasmic inclusions attributed to “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci” in the erythrocytes of an African penguin (Spheniscus demersus). Modified Wright-Giemsa stain. Inclusions ranged in size from small dots (a, b) to pleomorphic structures that were smaller than the host cell nucleus (c-l) and were found at a polar (a, e-h), subpolar (b, i-l) or median position (c, d), at times touching the host cell outer margins (c-e, g-k) or the host cell nucleus (l). Scale-bar: 5 μm Molecular detection of 16S rRNA and groEL sequences confirmed the presence of an organism belonging to Anaplasmataceae. MegaBLAST found that the closest publicly-available sequences were A. marginale (Genbank KU686794) with 96.8% sequence identity for the 16S rRNA gene and A. phagocytophilum (CP015376) with 78.7% sequence identity for the groEL gene. Relative to publicly-available sequences of A. pullorum, sequence identity was 89.1% for the 16S rRNA gene and 76.3% for the groEL gene. Phylogenetic trees of the 16S rRNA and groEL sequences differed in relation to the topology (Fig. 2, Additional file 4: Figure S2), but the different phylogenetic methods agreed that the organism detected in this study belongs to the genus Anaplasma, and that it is most closely related to the cluster comprising A. centrale, A. capra, A. marginale and A. ovis.
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic relationships of “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci” as determined by different phylogenetic methods based on partial sequences of the 16S rRNA and groEL genes. Branch lengths are drawn proportionally to evolutionary distance (scale-bars are shown). Numbers adjacent to nodes indicate bootstrap values (a, b) or posterior probabilities (c)

Phylogenetic relationships of “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci” as determined by different phylogenetic methods based on partial sequences of the 16S rRNA and groEL genes. Branch lengths are drawn proportionally to evolutionary distance (scale-bars are shown). Numbers adjacent to nodes indicate bootstrap values (a, b) or posterior probabilities (c)

Discussion

Considering the host species and the phylogenetic relationship to other Anaplasma species, we propose provisionally naming the bacterial strain detected in this study as “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci” (derived from Spheniscidae, the family of the penguin host). The finding that mammals are not the only vertebrate hosts of Anaplasma advances the question of whether Aegyptianella pullorum should be reclassified as Anaplasma pullorum. Our phylogenetic analyses agree that Ae. pullorum, Anaplasma spp. and “Candidatus Cryptoplasma californiense” are monophyletic; however, different phylogenetic methods disagree on the relationships amongst these groups (see Fig. 2 and Additional file 4: Figure S2). In the absence of additional information on the genetic diversity of other avian-infecting Anaplasmataceae, the question whether the reclassification of Ae. pullorum is warranted remains unresolved. The fact that Anaplasmataceae-like cytoplasmic inclusions have also been recorded in the erythrocytes of numerous other avian species (e.g. doves, cranes, kites, pheasants, psittacines and passerines) [13, 31–33] suggests that other species of avian-infecting Anaplasmataceae may exist but have yet to be described. This seems particularly plausible in the case of the intraerythrocytic inclusions originally described as “Aegyptianella botuliformis” [31] and “Aegyptianella minutus” [32], both of which produce erythrocytic inclusions that are morphologically distinct from those traditionally attributed to Ae. pullorum. Similarly, the Rickettsiales-like cytoplasmic inclusions observed in the erythrocytes of a king penguin (Aptenodytes patagonicus) that died while in care at SANCCOB [34] appeared distinct from those observed in this study (smaller, finer structure, with pale central vacuoles, more clearly-defined dark purple dots, did not distort the outer margin of the host cell) and likely also represent a distinct (and potentially novel) organism. Future studies on the molecular biology of avian-infecting Anaplasmataceae will therefore be valuable to provide insight into the evolution of these organisms and indicate the most appropriate nomenclature for Aegyptianella. Over the past few decades, tens of thousands of blood smears from African penguins have been examined at SANCCOB. However, because “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci” was not known to exist, it is possible that its inclusions were mistakenly interpreted as corresponding to small round forms of Babesia spp., degenerative changes, or staining artifacts. Our results therefore do not necessarily indicate that this is a novel or emerging pathogen, and further studies will be necessary to evaluate its prevalence in African penguins. The vectors of “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci” are not known. The soft tick Ornithodoros capensis is a common parasite of African penguins, including in South Africa [35], and is thus the most probable vector. However, the hard tick Ixodes uriae is also thought to occur on the coast of South Africa and, even though it has not yet been recorded on African penguins, it is a frequent parasite of other penguin species elsewhere [36]. Both O. capensis and I. uriae are shared by a large number of seabird species [37], including seabirds that breed sympatrically with African penguins such as Bank and Cape cormorants (Phalacrocorax neglectus and Phalacrocorax capensis), Cape gannets (Morus capensis) and Kelp gulls (Larus dominicanus) [38-40]. The potential therefore exists for the transmission of this bacterium to other seabird species.

Conclusions

Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci” is the first species candidate of Anaplasma shown to produce cytoplasmic inclusions in avian cells. This opens the possibility that cytoplasmic inclusions in avian erythrocytes that had previously been attributed to Aegyptianella sp. might in fact correspond to Anaplasma. It is therefore clear that the diversity and host range of Anaplasma spp. might have been underestimated, and further studies on the molecular biology of avian-infecting Anaplasmataceae will be valuable to provide insight into the evolution and epidemiology of these organisms. Text. Individual history of the studied African penguin. (PDF 25 kb) Table S1. GenBank accession codes for the sequences analyzed. (PDF 30 kb) Figure S1. Cytoplasmic inclusions in a lymphocyte of an African penguin (Spheniscus demersus) infected by “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci”. The lymphocyte with cytoplasmic inclusions (upper right) and a normal lymphocyte (lower left) are shown. Cytoplasmic inclusions had a width of 1.98 ± 0.54 μm (range = 0.86–3.10 μm). Modified Wright-Giemsa stain. Scale-bar: 5 μm. (PDF 8025 kb) Figure S2. Phylogenetic relationships of “Candidatus Anaplasma sphenisci” as determined by different phylogenetic methods based on partial sequences of the 16S rRNA and groEL genes. Branch lengths are drawn proportionally to evolutionary distance (scale-bars are shown). Numbers adjacent to nodes indicate bootstrap values (a, b, d, e) or posterior probabilities (c, g). (PDF 110 kb)
  45 in total

1.  Molecular Survey of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia of Red Deer and Sika Deer in Gansu, China in 2013.

Authors:  Y Li; Z Chen; Z Liu; J Liu; J Yang; Q Li; Y Li; J Luo; H Yin
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.005

2.  Carriage of Rickettsia spp., Coxiella burnetii and Anaplasma spp. by endemic and migratory wild birds and their ectoparasites in Cyprus.

Authors:  I Ioannou; D Chochlakis; N Kasinis; P Anayiotos; A Lyssandrou; B Papadopoulos; Y Tselentis; A Psaroulaki
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX.

Authors:  Julie D Thompson; Toby J Gibson; Des G Higgins
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-08

4.  Deplazes, P., Eckert, J., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G. and Zahner, H.: Lehrbuch der Parasitologie für die Tiermedizin [Textbook of Parasitology for Veterinary Medicine]. Third Edition.

Authors:  Tibor Kassai
Journal:  Acta Vet Hung       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Detection of novel strains genetically related to Anaplasma platys in Tunisian one-humped camels (Camelus dromedarius).

Authors:  Hanène Belkahia; Mourad Ben Said; Lotfi Sayahi; Alberto Alberti; Lilia Messadi
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Molecular detection of novel Anaplasmataceae closely related to Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius).

Authors:  Armanda D S Bastos; Osama B Mohammed; Nigel C Bennett; Charalambos Petevinos; Abdulaziz N Alagaili
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  PCR detection of granulocytic Anaplasma and Babesia in Ixodes ricinus ticks and birds in west-central Poland.

Authors:  Bogumiła Skotarczak; Anna Rymaszewska; Beata Wodecka; Marek Sawczuk; Małgorzata Adamska; Agnieszka Maciejewska
Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.447

8.  A rapid method for counting nucleated erythrocytes on stained blood smears by digital image analysis.

Authors:  Eben Gering; Carter T Atkinson
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.276

9.  Molecular characterization of Aegyptianella pullorum (Rickettsiales, Anaplasmataceae).

Authors:  Yasuko Rikihisa; Chunbin Zhang; Bruce M Christensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 15.683

View more
  4 in total

1.  The first detection of Anaplasma capra, an emerging zoonotic Anaplasma sp., in erythrocytes.

Authors:  Yongshuai Peng; Chenyang Lu; Yaqun Yan; Ke Shi; Qian Chen; Cong Zhao; Rongjun Wang; Longxian Zhang; Fuchun Jian; Changshen Ning
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 7.163

2.  Comprehensive health assessment and blood analyte reference intervals of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) in southeastern FL, USA.

Authors:  Annie Page-Karjian; Kathleen Rafferty; Clerson Xavier; Nicole I Stacy; Jon A Moore; Sarah E Hirsch; Samantha Clark; Charles A Manire; Justin R Perrault
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 3.  Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Control of Canine Infectious Cyclic Thrombocytopenia and Granulocytic Anaplasmosis: Emerging Diseases of Veterinary and Public Health Significance.

Authors:  Farhan Ahmad Atif; Saba Mehnaz; Muhammad Fiaz Qamar; Taleeha Roheen; Muhammad Sohail Sajid; Syed Ehtisham-Ul-Haque; Muhammad Kashif; Mourad Ben Said
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-12-08

4.  The Use and Limitations of the 16S rRNA Sequence for Species Classification of Anaplasma Samples.

Authors:  Mitchell T Caudill; Kelly A Brayton
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-03-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.