| Literature DB >> 30248919 |
Effrosyni Panagouli1, Amalia Dinou2, Panagiotis Mallis3, Efstathios Michalopoulos4, Andreas Papassavas5, Maria Spyropoulou-Vlachou6, John Meletis7, Maria Angelopoulou8, Kostas Konstantopoulos9, Theodoros Vassilakopoulos10, Catherine Stavropoulos-Giokas11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During pregnancy, the maternal-fetal contact may lead to the development of tolerance against the maternal human leukocyte antigen (HLA) that is not inherited by the fetus. These non-inherited maternal antigens (NIMAs) define acceptable HLA mismatches; therefore, the number of HLA phenotypes that are suitable matches for patients who need a hematopoietic stem cell transplant could be increased. Cord blood unit (CBU) transplantations to patients mismatched for a HLA loci, but similar to the ΝΙΜAs of the CBU, have a prognosis similar to 6/6-matched ones.Entities:
Keywords: CBU transplantation; Hellenic Cord Blood Bank; NIMA; cord blood
Year: 2018 PMID: 30248919 PMCID: PMC6316301 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering5040077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) ISSN: 2306-5354
Virtual human leucocyte antigen (HLA) phenotypes, created with the contribution of non-inherited maternal antigens (NIMA). Bold text indicates understanding how NIMA haplotype yields to 26 different HLA phenotypes.
| Cord Blood Unit (CBU) | A1, A3; B7, B44; DRB1*4, DRB1*16 | NIMA Haplotype: |
|---|---|---|
| Mother of CB Donor | A1, A2; B7, B8; DRB1*4, DRB1*11 | |
| Combining the | ||
| One substitution | ||
| VP1: A1, | VP3: A1, A3; | VP5: A1, A3; B7, B44; DRB1*4, |
| VP2: | VP4: A1, A3; B7, | VP6: A1, A3; B7, B44; |
| Two substitutions | ||
| VP7: A1, | VP11: | VP15: A1, A3; |
| VP8: A1, | VP12: | VP16: A1, A3; B7, |
| VP9: A1, A3; | VP13: A1, | VP17: |
| VP10: A1, A3; B7, | VP14: A1, | VP18: |
| Three substitutions | ||
| VP19: A1, | VP22: A1, | VP25: |
| VP20: A1, | VP23: A1, | VP26: |
| VP21: | VP24: | |
Summary of the number of the VPs that was created for each category of CBUs, depending on the mismatch (MM) between the CBU and the neonatal donor’s mother.
| Category of CBUs | MM between Donor and Mother | Loci with Homozygous HLA | Analysed CBUs | Created VPs | New, Unique VPs in the HCBB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBU | Neonatal Donor’s Mother | |||||
| First | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 18 | |
| Second | 2 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 632 | |
| Third | 3 | 0 | 0 | 96 | 2496 | |
| Homozygous HLA | 1 to 3 | 1 to 3 | 1 to 3 | 196 | 1827 | |
| Sum | - | - | - | 380 | 4973 | 4655 |
Figure 1Analysed CBUs and Created VPs.
A representative screenshot of the “VP analysis” Microsoft (MS) Office ExcelTM spreadsheet.
| Example of Linkage between a CBU and the Created VPs | HLA Τyping | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBU ID | HLA-A_1 | HLA-A_2 | HLA-B_1 | HLA-B_2 | HLA-DRB1_1 | HLA-DRB1_2 |
| (14)3530 D (CBU Donor) | 24 | 24 | 35 | 51 | 11 | 16 |
| (14)3530 M (Mother) | 2 | 24 | 35 | 51 | 13 | 16 |
| ΝΙΜA Haplotype | 2 | - | 13 | |||
| (14)3530-VP 1 | 2 | 24 | 35 | 51 | 11 | 16 |
| (14)3530-VP 2 | 24 | 24 | 35 | 51 | 13 | 16 |
| (14)3530-VP 3 | 24 | 24 | 35 | 51 | 11 | 13 |
| (14)3530-VP 4 | 2 | 24 | 35 | 51 | 13 | 16 |
| (14)3530-VP 5 | 2 | 24 | 35 | 51 | 11 | 13 |
An example of HLA-A, B, and DRB1 of a hypothetical patient.
| Example | HLA-A_1 | HLA-A_2 | HLA-B_1 | HLA-B_2 | HLA-DRB1_1 | HLA-DRB1_2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient-Recipient #12345 | 2 | 24 | 35 | 51 | 11 | 16 |
Figure 2A representative screenshot of the “VP database” worksheet.
Figure 3A screenshot of the filters tab that is available in each column of the “VP database” worksheet.
Figure 4A screenshot of the “VP database”, after the application of filters based on the HLA of the patient #12345 of Table 4.
Figure 5A screenshot of the field of analysis of: (A) CBU (13)4578 and (B) CBU (15)168, showing HLA-A, B and DRB1 of the CB donor, the mother, and all generated VPs.
Figure 6Results of matching the 80 Greek patients against the HCBB’s CBUs and the VPs of the “VP database”.