| Literature DB >> 30248907 |
Minqing Gu1, Yuyu Li2, Haiting Tang3, Cai Zhang4,5, Wende Li6,7, Yongping Zhang8,9, Yajuan Li10, Yuntao Zhao11,12, Cai Song13,14,15.
Abstract
<span class="Chemical">n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (<span class="Chemical">PUFAs) have been reported to improve depression. However, PUFA purities, caloric content, and ratios in different diets may affect the results. By using Fat-1 mice which convert n-6 to n-3 PUFAs in the brain, this study further evaluated anti-depressant mechanisms of n-3 PUFAs in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced model. Adult male Fat-1 and wild-type (WT) mice were fed soybean oil diet for 8 weeks. Depression-like behaviors were measured 24 h after saline or LPS central administration. In WT littermates, LPS reduced sucrose intake, but increased immobility in forced-swimming and tail suspension tests. Microglial M1 phenotype CD11b expression and concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and IL-17 were elevated, while M2 phenotype-related IL-4, IL-10, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 were decreased. LPS also reduced the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and tyrosine receptor kinase B (Trk B), while increasing glial fibrillary acidic protein expression and pro-BDNF, p75, NO, and iNOS levels. In Fat-1 mice, LPS-induced behavioral changes were attenuated, which were associated with decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines and reversed changes in p75, NO, iNOS, and BDNF. Gas chromatography assay confirmed increased n-3 PUFA levels and n-3/n-6 ratios in the brains of Fat-1 mice. In conclusion, endogenous n-3 PUFAs may improve LPS-induced depression-like behavior through balancing M1 and M2-phenotypes and normalizing BDNF function.Entities:
Keywords: BDNF; Fat-1 transgenic mice; depression; microglial M1 and M2 phenotypes; n-3 fatty acids; neurotrophins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30248907 PMCID: PMC6213921 DOI: 10.3390/nu10101351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1.Timeline of the experimental procedures. SPT: sucrose preference test; TST: tail suspension test; FST: forced swimming test; LPS: lipopolysaccharide.
Primer sequence used for real-time PCR.
| Genes | Primer | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| CD11b | Forward | 5′-CCCATGACCTTCCAAGAGAA-3′ |
| Reverse | 5′-AGAGGGCACCTGTCTGGTTA-3′ | |
| BDNF | Forward | 5′-AGCTGAGCGTGTGTGACAGT-3′ |
| Reverse | 5′-TCAGTTGGCCTTTGGATACC-3′ | |
| Trk B | Forward | 5′-CACACACAGGGCTCCTTA-3′ |
| Reverse | 5′-GTCAGCTCAAGCCAGACACA-3′ | |
| p75 | Forward | 5′-CCGATGCTCCTATGGCTACT-3′ |
| Reverse | 5′-CTCTGGGCACTCTTCACACA-3′ | |
| GFAP | Forward | 5′-GAAAGGTTGAATCGCTGGAG-3′ |
| Reverse | 5′-GCCACTGCCTCGTATTGAGT-3′ | |
| â-actin | Forward | 5′-GTCGTACCACTGGCATTGTG-3′ |
| Reverse | 5′-CTCTCAGCTGTGGTGGTGAA-3′ |
BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Trk B: tyrosine receptor kinase B; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein.
Fatty acid profile in mouse brain tissue.
| Fatty Acids mg/g Tissue | Saline | LPS | Statistical Effects | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | Fat-1 | WT | Fat-1 | LPS | Genotype | LPS × Genotype | |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.05 * | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | NS | <0.01 | NS |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | NS | NS | NS |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 2.65 ± 0.07 | 3.08 ± 0.05 *** | 2.76 ± 0.04 | 3.15 ± 0.10 ## | NS | <0.001 | NS |
| Subtotal n-3 | 3.01 ± 0.11 | 3.59 ± 0.13 ** | 3.18 ± 0.69 | 3.71 ± 0.11 ## | NS | <0.001 | NS |
| LA (18:2 n-6) | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.05 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | NS | NS | NS |
| DGLA (20:3 n-6) | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.02 * | 0.015 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | NS | <0.05 | NS |
| AA (20:4 n-6) | 1.56 ± 0.05 | 1.55 ± 0.06 | 1.60 ± 0.04 | 1.58 ± 0.08 | NS | NS | NS |
| Subtotal n-6 | 2.06 ± 0.05 | 2.21 ± 0.07 | 2.26 ± 0.07 | 2.19 ± 0.08 | NS | NS | NS |
| n-3/n-6 | 1.46 ± 0.04 | 1.68 ± 0.06 | 1.42 ± 0.07 | 1.68 ± 0.03 # | NS | <0.001 | NS |
| AA/DHA | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.02 ** | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.02 ## | NS | <0.001 | NS |
AA: arachidonic acid; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid; DGLA: dinomo-γ-linolenic acid; DPA: docosapentaenoic acid; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; LA: linolcic acid; LPS: lipopolysaccharides; NS: no significance. Data are mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. wild-type (WT)/saline; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. WT/LPS.
Figure 2.LPS decreased sucrose preference in wild-type mice, which was not reversed in Fat-1 mice. ** p < 0.01 vs. WT/saline. LPS: lipopolysaccharides; WT: Wild-type.
Figure 3.LPS increased immobility time in tail suspension test (TST), which was significantly reversed in Fat-1 mice. *** p < 0.001 vs. WT/saline; ### p < 0.001 vs. WT/LPS. LPS: lipopolysaccharides; WT: Wild-type.
Figure 4.LPS increased immobility time in forced-swimming test (FST), which was attenuated in Fat-1 mice. *** p < 0.001 vs. WT/saline; ## p < 0.01 vs. WT/LPS. LPS: lipopolysaccharides; WT: Wild-type.
Figure 5.LPS up-regulated interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α concentration significantly in WT littermates. These changes were markedly attenuated in Fat-1 mice. (A) IL-1β; (B) IL-17; (C) TNF-α. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001vs. WT/saline; # p < 0.05, ### p < 0.001 vs. WT/LPS. LPS: lipopolysaccharides; WT: Wild-type.
Figure 6.LPS decreased the concentration of IL-10, IL-4 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, but increased IL-13. These abnormalities were attenuated significantly in Fat-1 mice for IL-10, IL-4, TGF-β1, and IL-13. (A) IL-10; (B) TGF-β1; (C) IL-4; (D) IL-13. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 vs. WT/saline; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. WT/LPS. LPS: lipopolysaccharides; WT: Wild-type.
Figure 7.LPS increased iNOS and NO concentration. These increases were attenuated in Fat-1 mice signally. (A) iNOS; (B) NO. *** p < 0.001 vs. WT/saline; ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. WT/LPS. LPS: lipopolysaccharides; WT: Wild-type.
Figure 8.LPS up-regulated the mRNA expression of CD11b, GFAP, and p75, and down-regulated mRNA expression of BDNF in the LPS model. mRNA expression of CD11b and p75 were decreased in Fat-1 mice when compared with WT/LPS-challenged group. (A) CD11b; (B) GFAP; (C) BDNF; (D) p75; (E) Trk B. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. WT/saline; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. WT/LPS. GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; LPS: lipopolysaccharides; WT: Wild-type.
Figure 9.LPS significantly up-regulated the protein expression of CD11b, GFAP, p75, and pro-BDNF, but down-regulated protein expression of BDNF and Trk B in the animal model. The protein expression of GFAP was increased in Fat-1 mice when compared with wild-type mice. The rise in the protein expression of CD11b and p75 was prevented, and there was an up-regulation of BDNF level at the same time in Fat-1 mice. (A) CD11b; (B) GFAP; (C) pro-BDNF; (D) BDNF; (E) Trk B; (F) p75. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. WT/saline; # p < 0.05 vs. WT/LPS; && p < 0.01 vs. Fat-1/saline. LPS: lipopolysaccharides; WT: Wild-type. S: saline.