Literature DB >> 30248170

Prognostic Value of Low Tumor Burden in Patients With Melanoma.

Andrew S Poklepovic, Richard D Carvajal.   

Abstract

The therapeutic landscape for cutaneous melanoma has dramatically advanced in the last several years with the development, validation, and approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of several new therapies that have proven effective in treating metastatic disease. Considerable effort has been put into identifying prognostic and predictive markers of therapeutic response to better delineate the patient populations most likely to benefit from treatment. Baseline tumor burden has been described as a common clinical factor associated with treatment response: lower tumor burden at the time of therapeutic intervention is associated with improved responses and survival outcomes on several therapies. Some therapies have shown efficacy as adjuvant interventions in patients with subclinical disease following definitive treatment, further supporting their role in patients with minimal tumor burden. The increasing evidence that patients with lower tumor burden may be the ones who derive maximal benefit from several melanoma-directed therapies points toward the critical need for risk-tailored surveillance to permit early identification of melanoma metastasis in patients at high risk for recurrence.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30248170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the sum of the diameters of single foci in multifocal papillary thyroid cancer: the concept of new-old tumor burden.

Authors:  Jacopo Manso; Simona Censi; Amir Roberti; Maurizio Iacobone; Susi Barollo; Loris Bertazza; Francesca Galuppini; Federica Vianello; Nora Albinger; Carla Scaroni; Gianmaria Pennelli; Caterina Mian
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 2.  Optimal treatment strategy for metastatic melanoma patients harboring BRAF-V600 mutations.

Authors:  Emilio Francesco Giunta; Vincenzo De Falco; Stefania Napolitano; Giuseppe Argenziano; Gabriella Brancaccio; Elvira Moscarella; Davide Ciardiello; Fortunato Ciardiello; Teresa Troiani
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 8.168

3.  Prospective validation of the prognostic 31-gene expression profiling test in primary cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Jennifer Keller; Theresa L Schwartz; Jason M Lizalek; Ea-Sle Chang; Ashaki D Patel; Maria Y Hurley; Eddy C Hsueh
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Factors Determining Long-Term Antitumor Responses to Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy in Melanoma.

Authors:  Kimberly Loo; James W Smithy; Michael A Postow; Allison Betof Warner
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of PET/CT Surveillance Schedules to Detect Distant Recurrence of Resected Stage III Melanoma.

Authors:  Mbathio Dieng; Robin M Turner; Sarah J Lord; Andrew J Einstein; Alexander M Menzies; Robyn P M Saw; Omgo E Nieweg; John F Thompson; Rachael L Morton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma.

Authors:  Andrew S Poklepovic; Jason J Luke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.860

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.