| Literature DB >> 30248150 |
Chih-Chiang Hu1, Marina Katerelos2, Suet-Wan Choy3,4, Amy Crossthwaite3,4,5, Susan P Walker1,4, Gabrielle Pell4, Mardiana Lee3,5, Natasha Cook6, Peter F Mount2,3,5, Kathy Paizis3,4, David A Power2,3,5.
Abstract
Pre-eclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy characterised by hypertension and sodium retention by the kidneys. To identify changes in sodium uptake proteins in the tubules of the distal nephron, we studied their expression in urinary extracellular vesicles or exosomes (uEVs). Urine was collected from women with pre-eclampsia or during normal pregnancy, and from healthy non-pregnant controls. uEVs were isolated by centrifugation and analyzed by Western blot. Expression, proteolytic cleavage and phosphorylation was determined by densitometric analysis normalized to the exosome marker CD9. Results showed a significant increase in phosphorylation of the activating S130 site in NKCC2, the drug target for frusemide, in women with pre-eclampsia compared with normal pregnant women. Phosphorylation of the activating sites T101/105 in NKCC2 was similar but the activating T60 site in NCC, the drug target for thiazide diuretics, showed significantly less phosphorylation in pre-eclampsia compared with normal pregnancy. Expression of the larger forms of the α subunit of ENaC, the drug target for amiloride, was significantly greater in pre-eclampsia, with more fragmentation of theγ subunit. The differences observed are predicted to increase the activity of NKCC2 and ENaC while reducing that of NCC. This will increase sodium reabsorption, and so contribute to hypertension in pre-eclampsia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30248150 PMCID: PMC6152984 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Antibodies used in the study.
| Antibody | Species | Immunising antigen | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-NKCC2 | Rabbit polyclonal | Rat N-terminus aa 33–55 | Stress-Marq |
| Anti-pNKCC2-T101/105 | Rabbit polyclonal | Human N-terminus aa 99–110 | Fraser et al [ |
| Anti-pNKCC2-S130 | Rabbit polyclonal | Mouse N-terminus aa 121–130 | Cook et al [ |
| Anti-NCC | Rabbit polyclonal | Rat N-terminus aa 74–95 | Abcam |
| Anti-pNCC-T60 | Rabbit polyclonal | Human N-terminus aa 54–66 | Fraser et al [ |
| Anti-α-ENaC | Rabbit polyclonal | Rat N-terminus | Stress Marq |
| Anti-γ-ENaC | Rabbit polyclonal | Rat C-terminus aa 629–650 | Stress Marq |
| Anti-CD9 | Rabbit monoclonal | Human around aa 178 | Cell Signaling Technology |
Characteristics of subjects in the PE, NP and NC groups at enrolment.
| Study groups | Pre-eclampsia | Normotensive pregnant | Non-pregnant control | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.0±5.4 | 31.8±3.9 | 25.1±1.3 | n.s. | |
| 31.6±3.4 | 32.2±3.7 | n/a | n.s. | |
| 58 | 38 | n/a | n.s. | |
| 151.5±13.8 | 113.1±7.8 | 104.3±10.5 | <0.001 | |
| 92.7±8.2 | 68.1±7.9 | 69.0±8.0 | <0.001 | |
| 28.8±8.6 | 29.5±6.6 | 20.5±1.9 | n.s. | |
| 220 | 10 | 6 | <0.001 |
1Systolic blood pressure
2Diastolic blood pressure
3Body mass index
4Urine Pr/Cr was done on 23 subjects in the PE group, 17 in the NP group, and 21 in the NC group.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation if parametric or median (IQR) if not parametric. n.s. = not significant
Fig 1Western blot and densitometry showing expression of NKCC2.
(A) Representative Western blot from normal controls (NC), women with normal pregnancies (NP) and with pre-eclampsia (PE) probed with antibodies against NKCC2, pNKCC2 (S130 and T101/105), and CD9. (B) Densitometric analysis of total NKCC2 normalised for CD9 in the three groups. Difference between groups by Kruskall-Wallis test p<0.002. (C and D) Densitometric analysis of total NKCC2 pS130 normalised for total NKCC2 (C) and CD9 (D) in the three groups. Difference between groups by Kruskall-Wallis test p<0.0001 for both comparisons. (E and F) Densitometric analysis of total NKCC2 pS130 normalised for total NKCC2 (E) and CD9 (F) in the three groups. Difference between groups by Kruskall-Wallis test p<0.01 for (E) and not significant for (F). Individual comparisons by Dunns’ test *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001.
Detection of bands for phosphorylated forms of NKCC2 and NCC, and for ENaC proteins.
| Species | PE | NP | NC | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23/24 | 6/24 | 6/20 | <0.001 | |
| 15/24 | 21/24 | 16/20 | n.s. | |
| 11/24 | 21/24 | 18/20 | <0.001 | |
| 20/24 | 12/24 | 13/21 | <0.05 | |
| 2/24 | 3/24 | 4/21 | n.s. | |
| 18/24 | 2/24 | 2/21 | <0.001 | |
| 14/24 | 7/24 | 11/21 | n.s. | |
| 18/24 | 15/24 | 12/21 | n.s. | |
| 0/24 | 5/24 | 3/21 | n.s. | |
| 9/24 | 8/24 | 8/21 | n.s. | |
| 11/24 | 1/24 | 0/21 | <0.001 | |
| 8/24 | 1/24 | 4/21 | n.s. |
The numerator is the number with a detectable band, and the denominator is the total number of samples analysed. One NC subject with missing pNKCC2 and pNCC data. n.s. = not significant.
*P-value refers to a 2x3 way contingency table comparing all groups analysed by or
#Chi-square or
$Fisher’s exact test.
Fig 2Western blot and densitometry showing phosphorylation of NCC and pNCC.
(A) Representative Western blot from normal controls (NC), women with normal pregnancies (NP) and with pre-eclampsia (PE) probed with antibodies again NCC-pT60, NCC, and CD9. (B) Densitometric analysis of total NCC normalised for CD9 in the three groups. No difference between groups by Kruskall-Wallis test. (C and D) Densitometric analysis of total NCC pT60 normalised for total NCC (C) and CD9 (D) in the three groups. Difference between groups by Kruskall-Wallis test p<0.001 for (C) and p<0.002 for (D). Individual comparisons by Dunns’ test *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001.
Fig 3Expression of α-ENaC and γ-ENaC by Western blot.
(A) Schematic of human α-ENaC and γ-ENaC, modified from Kleyman et al [16]. Antibody binding sites, based on similarity to the rat sequence used to generate the original antibody is shown. For human α-ENaC it was 78% identical to the rat sequence over amino acids 20–42, while for γ-ENaC it was 86% identical over the residues 628–649. M = predicted transmembrane region (derived using DAS-TMfilter). Intracellular (IC) and extracellular regions shown. (B) Effect of cleavage on the α- or β-subunit of ENaC. Predicted antibody binding sites shown. (C) Representative Western blot from normal controls (NC), women with normal pregnancies (NP) and with pre-eclampsia (PE) probed with antibodies again α-ENaC, γ-ENaC, and CD9. The symbol Q in (C) represents the area of the blot used in densitometry. (D and E) Densitometric analysis of total α-ENaC (D) and γ-ENaC (E) normalised for CD9 in the three groups. Difference between groups by Kruskall-Wallis test p<0.0001 for (D) and p<0.005 for (E). Individual comparisons by Dunns’ test *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 and ****p<0.0001.
Fig 4Linear regression analysis of proteinuria and sodium transporter band intensities in women with PE.
(A) NKCC2 pS130 vs urine protein/creatinine ratio, p = 0.014, n = 19. (B) γ-ENaC 50kD species vs urine protein/creatinine ratio, p = 0.001, n = 19. (C) γ-ENaC 50kD species vs urine protein/creatinine ratio, p = 0.002, n = 19.
Linear regression analysis of sodium transporter densitometry as a ratio with CD9.
| NKCC2 pS130 | NKCC2 pT101/105 | NKCC2 | NCC T60 | NCC | α-ENaC | γ-ENaC 75kD | γ-ENaC 50kD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pS130 | 0.428 | 0.621 | ||||||
| pT101/105 | 0.246 | 0.422 | 0.320 | |||||
| NKCC2 | 0.428 | 0.246 | 0.498 | 0.248 | ||||
| pT60 | 0.422 | 0.774 | ||||||
| NCC | 0.320 | 0.774 | ||||||
| α-ENaC | 0.621 | 0.498 | 0.399 | 0.305 | ||||
| γ-ENaC 75 kD | 0.248 | 0.399 | 0.868 | |||||
| γ-ENaC 50 kD | 0.305 | 0.868 |
aLinear regression data expressed as R2 values (upper line) and ‘p’ value (lower line).
All sodium transporter densitometry values used to derive regressions were expressed as a ratio with the densitometry of CD9. N = 22 for each comparison.