| Literature DB >> 30248138 |
Christopher D Chaput1, Adam Shar1,2, Daniel Jupiter3, Zach Hubert2, Bret Clough4, Ulf Krause5, Carl A Gregory4.
Abstract
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is performed to relieve pain caused by degenerative disk disease and nerve obstruction. As an alternative to bone graft, autologous concentrated bone marrow aspirate (CBMA) is used to achieve vertebral fusion with a satisfactory success rate. This has been attributed in part to bone marrow-resident mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) with the capacity to differentiate into osteoblasts and generate bone tissue. To date, there has been no study comparing cellular yields, MSC frequencies and their osteogenic potential with ACDF outcome. Patients (n = 24) received ACDF with CBMA and allograft bone matrix. Colony forming unit fibroblast (CFU-F) and CFU-osteoblasts (CFU-O) assays were performed on CBMA samples to enumerate MSCs (CFU-F) and osteogenic MSCs (CFU-O). CFUs were normalized to CBMA volume to define yield and also to mononuclear cells (MNC) to define frequency. After 1-year, fusion rates were good (86.7%) with pain and disability improved. There was a negative relationship between MNC and CFU-F measurements with age of patient and CFU-Os negatively correlated with age in females but not males. Tobacco use did not affect CBMA but was associated with poorer clinical outcome. Surprisingly, we found that while high-grade fusion was not associated with CFU-O, it correlated strongly (p<0.0067) with CBMA containing the lowest frequencies of CFU-F (3.0x10(-6)-5.83x10(-5) CFU-F/MNC). MNC levels alone were not responsible for the results. These observations suggest that osteogenesis by human bone marrow is controlled by homeostatic ratio of MSCs to other cellular bone marrow components rather than absolute level of osteogenic MSCs, and that a lower ratio of MSCs to other cellular components in marrow tends to predict effective osteogenesis during ACDF. The results presented herein challenge the current dogma surrounding the proposed mechanism of MSCs in bone healing.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30248138 PMCID: PMC6152872 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Modified Lenke’s criteria for defining fusion.
(A&B): Examples of saggital (left) and coronal (right) CT reconstructions demonstrating Grade 1, defined as solid fusion with bridging bone through and around cage in the interbody space (arrowed, A), and Grade 3 with radiolucent line within the interbody space and likely pseudoarthrosis (arrowed, B). (C) Summary of definitions.
Fig 2Morphology of CBMA and CFUs and a representative MSC preparation from one of the CBMA specimens demonstrating differentiation into mineralizing osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondrocytes.
(A) Micrograph of hemacytometer containing unconcentrated BMA (left) and the same sample after concentration (right). Tryphan blue stained cells represent <5% of the population. Scale bar = 0.1 mm (B) Typical appearance of crystal violet-stained CFU-F plate. Scale bar = 30 mm. (C) Typical appearance of alizarin red S-stained CFU-O plate. Scale bar = 30 mm. (D): Typical appearance of crystal violet-stained CFU-F colony. Scale bar = 250 μm. (E) Typical appearance of alizarin red S-stained CFU-O colony. Scale bar = 250 μm. (F) Osteogenic monolayer stained with alizarin red S to indicate calcified matrix. Scale bar = 250 μm. (H) Adipogenic monolayer stained with oil red O to visualize internal lipid droplets. Scale bar = 250 μm. (G&I) Control (undifferentiated) monolayer stained with alizarin red S and oil red O respectively. Scale bar = 250 μm. (J&K) Chondrogenic micro-mass pellet, sectioned and stained with toluidine blue to visualize sulphated proteoglycans and chondrocyte lacunae. Scale bar = 200 μm (A), 50 μm (B).
Demographics, %NDI, Hip VAS and CBMA and CFU data.
| 46.8 years (32–67, SD 9.32) | |
| | 58.3% (14) |
| | 41.7% (10) |
| | 50% (12) |
| | 50% (12) |
| 48.00 (2.00–82.00, 18.76, 40.08–55.92, 48.00) | |
| 21.08 (0.00–70.00, 19.18, 12.98–29.18, 16.00) | |
| -26.92 (-52.00–10.00, 16.88, -34.04- -19.79, -32.00) pre vs post p-value <0.0001 | |
| 1.07 (0–8, 2.369, -0.2961–2.439, 0) | |
| 4.032x107 (3.42x106-1.08x108, SD 2.842x107, CI 2.803x10-7–5.216x10-7, median 3.358x10-7) | |
| 1914 (43–6549, SD 1535, CI 1235–2592, median 1815) | |
| 858 (10–2479, SD 761, CI 529–1187, median 657) | |
| 4.761 x 10−5 (3x10-6–1.24x10-4, SD 2.77x10-5, CI 3.56x10-5–5.96x10-5, median 4.3x10-5) | |
| 2.1 x 10−5 (6.67x10-7–6.3x10-5, SD 1.65x10-5, 1.366x10-5–2.831x10-5, median 1.7x10-5) | |
Demographic data, clinical outcome, and MNC and CFU counts after CBMA. %NDI values are based on the Neck Disability Index of Vernon and Mior where 0% refers to no pain or disability and 100% refers to the maximum level of debilitation. Pre and post NDI comparisons performed by Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test. VAS refers to a 10 point visual analog pain score where 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain). SD refers to standard deviation, CI refers to 95% confidence interval.
Correlation analyses of MNC recovery CFU counts with age.
| Test | Sex | Test | P-value | r value (CI) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Pearson | 0.088 | -0.36 (-0.67–0.057) | negative trend | |
| All | Pearson | 0.077 | -0.38 (-0.69–0.044) | negative trend | |
| All | Pearson | 0.71 | 0.083 (-0.35–0.49) | ||
| All | Pearson | 0.30 | -0.36 (-0.67–0.058) | ||
| All | Spearman | 0.25 | -0.28 (-0.66–0.22) | ||
| Males | Pearson | 0.77 | -0.12 (-0.76–0.63) | ||
| Males | Pearson | 0.29 | 0.39 (-0.36–0.84) | ||
| Males | Pearson | 0.39 | -0.32 (-0.81–0.43) | ||
| Males | Pearson | 0.26 | -0.39 (-0.82–0.31) | ||
| Females | Pearson | 0.0198 | -0.69 (-0.91- -0.15) | negative correlation | |
| Females | Spearman | 0.075 | -0.54 (-0.86–0.069) | negative trend | |
| Females | Pearson | 0.71 | -0.11 (-0.63–0.46) | ||
| Females | Pearson | 0.41 | 0.25 (-0.35–0.703) |
Correlation analyses between MNC recovery or CFU frequency with donor age. In the notes column,
ǂ represents a potential trend (p>0.05, <0.1) and
* represents statistical significance. CI represents 95% confidence interval.
Fig 3Statistical analyses of cellular parameters, patient demographics and clinical outcome.
Analyses by yield (A-C) and by frequency (D-F). (A) Negative trend between MNC recovery and age of patient. (B) Negative correlation between CFU-F/mL (yield) measurements and age of patient. (C) Negative correlation between CFU-O/mL (yield) and age of patient in females. (D) Negative trend between CFU-O/MNC (frequency) and age of patient in females. (E) CFU-F/MNC (frequency) counts are significantly lower in males than females. (F) CFU-F/MNC (frequency) values are significantly lower from patients that exhibit optimal fusions (Grade 1, Grade 1,2, Grade 1,1) when compared to the remainder of the data set (Grade 2+). Correlation analyses were performed using the Pearson test, pairwise comparisons were performed using the Student’s T-test. Error bars represent standard deviations and horizontal lines represent the mean.
Relationship between gender and tobacco use on CBMA.
| Comparison | Mean and SEM | Test | P-value | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males 3.893x10-7 ± 1.299x10-7 | T-test | 0.87 | ||
| Males 1698 ± 658.8 | T-test | 0.57 | ||
| Males 3.154x10-5 ± 6.408x10-6 | T-test | 0.03 | Higher in females* | |
| Males 726.2 ± 278.8 | T-test | 0.51 | ||
| Males 1.507x10-5 ± 4.456x10-6 | T-test | 0.19 | ||
| No 3.663x10-7 ± 5.831x10-6 | T-test | 0.54 | ||
| No 2314 ± 565.9 | T-test | 0.20 | ||
| No 5.094 x10-5± 9.349x10-6 | T-test | 0.59 | ||
| No 834.7 ± 224.0 | T-test | 0.87 | ||
| No 2.022x10-5 ± 3.631x10-6 | T-test | 0.84 |
Effects of gender and tobacco use on CBMA cellularity.
CBMA parameters and fusion outcome.
| Comparison | Mean and SEM | Test | P-value | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes 4.520x10-7± 8.929x10-6 | T-test | 0.45 | ||
| Yes 1650 ± 311.6 | T-test | 0.51 | ||
| Yes 3.273x10-5± 4.375x10-6 | T-test | 0.0067 | Greater probability of fusion in samples (3.0x10-6–5.83x10-5 CFU-F/mL) | |
| Yes 926.8 ± 215.2 | T-test | 0.74 | ||
| Yes 2.249x10-5± 5.541 x10-6 | T-test | 0.25 | ||
Comparison of CBMA cellular parameters with fusion outcome with fusion defined by Grade 1 according to the modified Lenke’s Criteria (Table 1).
** represents statistical significance (p<0.01).