Literature DB >> 30247310

Validation of Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Tests in Lumbar Disk Herniation Surgery.

Surabhi Bhatt1, Barrett S Boody, Jason W Savage, Wellington K Hsu, Nan E Rothrock, Alpesh A Patel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate validation, floor/ceiling effects, and time constraints limit utilization of standardized patient-reported outcome measures. We aimed to validate Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests (CATs) for patients treated surgically for a lumbar disk herniation.
METHODS: PROMIS, CATs, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-12 measures were administered to 78 patients treated with lumbar microdiskectomy for symptomatic disk herniation with radiculopathy.
RESULTS: PROMIS CATs demonstrated convergent validity with legacy measures; PROMIS scores were moderately to highly correlated with the Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-12 physical component scores (r = 0.41 and 0.78, respectively). PROMIS CATs demonstrated similar responsiveness to change compared with legacy measures. On average, the PROMIS CATs were completed in 2.3 minutes compared with 5.7 minutes for legacy measures. DISCUSSION: The PROMIS CATs demonstrate convergent and known groups' validity and are comparable in responsiveness to legacy measures. These results suggest similar utility and improved efficiency of PROMIS CATs compared with legacy measures. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30247310      PMCID: PMC7315643          DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  25 in total

1.  Simple as possible? Or too simple? Possible limits to the universality of the one half standard deviation.

Authors:  Dorcas E Beaton
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Marcus M Martin; Brian R Subach; Leah Y Carreon; Steven D Glassman; Thomas C Schuler; Sigurd Berven
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 3.  Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; C Davey; M J Buxton; D R Jones
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Anthony L Asher; Saniya S Godil; Clinton J Devin; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Validation of PROMIS ® Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research.

Authors:  Man Hung; Judith F Baumhauer; L Daniel Latt; Charles L Saltzman; Nelson F SooHoo; Kenneth J Hunt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; David N Shau; Owoicho Adogwa; William N Anderson; Clinton J Devin; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-02-10

8.  PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Sally E Jensen; Benjamin D Schalet; Jennifer L Beaumont; Dagmar Amtmann; Susan Czajkowski; Darren A Dewalt; James F Fries; Paul A Pilkonis; Bryce B Reeve; Arthur A Stone; Kevin P Weinfurt; David Cella
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Owoicho Adogwa; Stephen K Mendenhall; David N Shau; William N Anderson; Joseph S Cheng; Clinton J Devin; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  PROMIS PF CAT Outperforms the ODI and SF-36 Physical Function Domain in Spine Patients.

Authors:  Darrel S Brodke; Vadim Goz; Maren W Voss; Brandon D Lawrence; William Ryan Spiker; Man Hung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  4 in total

1.  Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Ian Braithwaite
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-13

2.  Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maggie E Horn; Emily K Reinke; Logan J Couce; Bryce B Reeve; Leila Ledbetter; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Validation in Hip Arthroscopy: A Shift Towards Reducing Survey Burden.

Authors:  Erik Gerlach; Ryan Selley; Daniel Johnson; Richard Nicolay; Gregory Versteeg; Mark Plantz; Vehniah Tjong; Michael Terry
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-10

4.  What Can Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Tell Us About Participation Bias in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Among Lumbar Spine Patients?

Authors:  Conor P Lynch; Elliot D K Cha; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Cara E Geoghegan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-01-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.