Dominik Jan Naczynski1, Jason H Stafford1, Silvan Türkcan1, Cesare Jenkins1, Ai Leen Koh2, Conroy Sun1,3, Lei Xing1. 1. 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 2. 2 Stanford Nanocharacterization Laboratory, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 3. 3 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Abstract
The use of short-wave infrared (SWIR) light for fluorescence bioimaging offers the advantage of reduced photon scattering and improved tissue penetration compared to traditional shorter wavelength imaging approaches. While several nanomaterials have been shown capable of generating SWIR emissions, rare-earth-doped nanoparticles (REs) have emerged as an exceptionally bright and biocompatible class of SWIR emitters. Here, we demonstrate SWIR imaging of REs for several applications, including lymphatic mapping, real-time monitoring of probe biodistribution, and molecular targeting of the αvβ3 integrin in a tumor model. We further quantified the resolution and depth penetration limits of SWIR light emitted by REs in a customized imaging unit engineered for SWIR imaging of live small animals. Our results indicate that SWIR light has broad utility for preclinical biomedical imaging and demonstrates the potential for molecular imaging using targeted REs.
The use of short-wave infrared (SWIR) light for fluorescence bioimaging offers the advantage of reduced photon scattering and improved tissue penetration compared to traditional shorter wavelength imaging approaches. While several nanomaterials have been shown capable of generating SWIR emissions, rare-earth-doped nanoparticles (REs) have emerged as an exceptionally bright and biocompatible class of SWIR emitters. Here, we demonstrate SWIR imaging of REs for several applications, including lymphatic mapping, real-time monitoring of probe biodistribution, and molecular targeting of the αvβ3 integrin in a tumor model. We further quantified the resolution and depth penetration limits of SWIR light emitted by REs in a customized imaging unit engineered for SWIR imaging of live small animals. Our results indicate that SWIR light has broad utility for preclinical biomedical imaging and demonstrates the potential for molecular imaging using targeted REs.
Entities:
Keywords:
NIR-II; SWIR; advances in optical probes; cancer detection imaging; integrin; nanoparticle; near-infrared imaging; short-wave infrared
Imaging approaches that are able to resolve the physiological and molecular complexity of
cancer can provide deep insight into the underlying causes of disease development, improve
our understanding of treatment responses, and ultimately lead to better patient prognoses.[1-3] Molecular imaging approaches, in particular, offer a means by which to monitor the
dynamics of cancer progression, permitting their use in a wide variety of clinical
applications ranging from assessment of tumor metabolism to in situ molecular profiling.[4-6] However, current imaging efforts are limited by the availability of contrast agents
with the requisite properties for enabling rapid resolution of molecular features within
biological tissue. In contrast to other molecular imaging modalities, optical imaging offers
remarkable detection sensitivity and the ability to conduct real-time image acquisition.[7-9] Traditionally, optical imaging has relied on the use of visible or near-infrared
(NIR) light. Photons in these spectral regions are heavily scattered as they pass through
biological tissue and produce background autofluorescence generated by tissue components.
These limitations result in limited photon penetration, poor image resolution, and a low
signal to noise ratio for distinguishing targets of interest.[10-12] In contrast, recent reports describing imaging with NIR-II or short-wave infrared
(SWIR) light have shown this spectral region (1000-2300 nm) exhibiting reduced light
scattering, improved photon penetrance, and exceptionally low autofluorescence.[13-15]Various materials have been investigated as NIR-II emitting agents, including single-walled
carbon nanotubes (SWNTs),[16-21] quantum dots,[22-24] small-molecule fluorophores,[25-27] and rare-earth-doped nanoparticles (REs).[13,28] While each class of agents offer certain advantages for in vivo imaging, REs have
emerged as a versatile nanomaterial platform exhibiting bright SWIR emissivity, favorable
biocompatibility, and tunable emission characteristics.[29-31] Rare-earth-doped nanoparticles are typically composed of a fluoride-based nanocrystal
host that has been doped with one or more rare-earth cations. Unlike the broad emissions and
low quantum yields observed with SWNTs,[14] REs produce bright SWIR emissions following NIR excitation with emission peaks that
can be selected throughout the entire SWIR spectrum by careful selection of rare-earth
elements during synthesis.[32,33] Rare-earth-doped nanoparticles have also been shown to be exceptionally resilient to
photobleaching under prolonged excitation or exposure to ambient lighting conditions, which
is ideal for repeated imaging in real time.[34]Recent reports on the use of SWIR-emitting REs as in vivo imaging probes have focused on
the detection of tumor lesions using untargeted, protein-modified REs and relied primarily
on nanoparticle size to enhance tumor accumulation.[13] Subsequent work reported SWIR in vivo imaging using REs decorated with physically
adsorbed targeting agents.[28] The focus of our current work was to investigate whether REs could be utilized as
SWIR molecular imaging probes by targeting these agents to a specific tumor biomarker. We
chose to further explore the use of REs in several other proof-of-concept SWIR bioimaging
applications including lymphatic mapping and tracking probe biodistribution.
Methods
Synthesis and Functionalization of Rare-Earth Nanoparticles
NaYF4: Er, Yb nanoparticles were prepared using a well-established solvothermal
decomposition method. Briefly, rare-earth trifluoroacetate precursors were dissolved in
oleylamine. The shell precursor solution was prepared by dissolving stoichiometric amounts
of the sodium and yttrium trifluoroacetates in oleylamine. The core solution was heated to
340°C under vigorous stirring in inert nitrogen atmosphere to allow the formation of the
core. Next, the shell precursor was added, and after cooling, the synthesized
nanoparticles were precipitated out of solution and washed repeatedly with ethanol. The
resulting REs were surface modified with
1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(amino[polyethylene glycol]-2000)
1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[amino(polyethylene glycol)-2000]
(DSPE-PEG(2000) amine) –polyethylene glycol (PEG)–NH2 (MW 2000; Avanti Polar
Lipids, Alabaster, Alabama) by ligand exchange performed in tetrahydrofuran (THF) under
ultrasonication (Branson Ultrasonic Corp, Danbury, Connecticut). Polyethylene glycolylated
REs were then added dropwise into deionized water and excess THF was evaporated overnight
under gentle heating (40°C). Any remaining aggregates were removed by a 0.22-μm
filter.Rare-earth-doped nanoparticles were functionalized with cyclized tripeptideArginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) or Arginine–alanine–aspartate (RAD) (Peptides
International, Louisville, Kentucky), for targeting studies. Peptide conjugation was
performed through covalent attachment to the amine-functionalized nanoparticles using
N-hydroxysuccinimide heterobifunctional linkers and thiolation chemistry. Succinimidyl
iodoacetate (10 mg; Pierce Biotechnology, Waltham, Massachusetts) was dissolved into 0.1
mL of dimethyl sulfoxide and added to the 1.0 mL of the PEGylated nanoparticle suspension
described in the previous section. The solution was protected from light and placed on a
shaker for 2 hours at room temperature. The nanoprobes were purified by Zeba spin columns
(40 K MWCO; Pierce Biotechnology) eluted with 100 mM bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.50). Next,
1.0 mg of the purified iodoacetate functionalized nanoparticles was added to either
Cys-modified cyclic RGD or cyclic RAD for 2 hours at room temperature. Upon conjugation,
the peptide-conjugated nanoparticles were purified by column chromatography using Zeba
spin columns against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
Nanoparticle Characterization
Rare-earth-doped nanoparticles were visualized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Transmission electron microscopy grids were prepared by depositing a drop of diluted
nanoparticle suspension on ultrathin carbon support film (Ted Pella, Redding, California).
All TEM measurements were acquired using an FEI 80-300 Titan operated at 300 kV. Electron
dispersive spectroscopy measurements are acquired in TEM mode, with the beam focused down
to the size of an individual particle.Hydrodynamic size was measured in PBS using Zetasizer Nano series dynamic light
scattering (DLS) particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). Emission
spectra of REs were collected from a dried pellet (∼0.5 g) of nanoparticles following
exposure to NIR light generated from a 975 nm laser diode (B&W Tek, Newark, Delaware).
Spectra were collected using a spectrometer (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, New Jersey)
coupled to an InGaAs detector.
Short-Wave Infrared Imaging System
A custom small animal imaging system was designed to capture low levels of SWIR light.
The system was housed within a light, tight black box equipped with a moveable stage and
tubing ports for convenient administration of isoflurane and removal of waste gas. An
InGaAs camera (NIRvana 640; Princeton Instruments) with >80% quantum efficiency in the
desired SWIR emission range was positioned above the imaging plane. A Schneider Xenon lens
(F-number: 0.95, focal length: 17 mm) was installed onto the camera and equipped with a
combination of one 1400 nm long-pass (FEL1400; ThorLabs, Newton, New Jersey) and two 1550
nm (FB1550-12; ThorLabs) bandpass filters. A 975 nm laser source was piped into the black
box through a fiber optic cable, which was attached to a collimator and diffuser to enable
a uniform and constant excitation beam radius. Acquired SWIR images were processed using
ImageJ (version 1.48).
Cell Culture
U87-luc, a humanglioblastoma cell line with constitutive expression of firefly
luciferase, was generously provided by Dr Prabhas Moghe (Department of Biomedical
Engineering, Rutgers University). Cells were maintained in minimal essential medium
containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) G418 (300 mg·mL−1), and 1%
penicillin–streptomycin. 4T1, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines were all
maintained in RPMI media containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. All cells were
cultured at 37°C under an atmosphere of 5% CO.
Cell Targeting
Two humanbreast cancer cell lines with varied expression of the
αvβ3 were chosen to assess the in vitro cellular targeting of
functionalized REs. High αvβ3 expressing MDA-MB-231 and low
αvβ3 expressing MCF-7 cells were seeded at 105 cells
per well in a 6-well plate (at least a 20-fold difference in expression).[35] After 24 hours postseeding, approximately 10 μg/mL of RGD- or RAD-functionalized
REs was added to the media of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells. Following 2 hours of incubation,
media was replaced and cells were washed 3× in PBS before trypsinization. Cell suspensions
were pelleted and imaged for SWIR fluorescence using the SWIR imaging system.
In vivo SWIR Imaging
All animal studies were conducted in accordance with Stanford University Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee–approved protocols. During imaging experiments, animals were
weighed daily and monitored for changes in behavior. Imaging was performed on 8-week-old
female athymic nude mice purchased from Charles River Laboratories (San Diego,
California). For biodistribution imaging, 50 μL of 2.5 × 106 4T1 cells mixed
with 50 μL of Matrigel were subcutaneously injected into the mammary fat pad. For
nanoparticle targeting imaging, 50 μL of 2.5 × 106 U87-luc cells mixed with 50
μL of Matrigel were subcutaneously injected into the right flank. Tumor diameters were
measured twice weekly with electronic calipers and tumor volumes calculated by the
formula: volume = (d
short)2 × (d
long)/2, where d
short and d
long represent the short and long diameters, respectively. Tumors were allowed
to grow to 100 mm3 prior to initiating the SWIR imaging studies.To assess the location of tumor burden for the targeted imaging studies, U87-luc tumor
margins were confirmed with bioluminescence imaging captured after intraperitoneal
injection of mice with 100 µL of 30 mg/mL of d-luciferin. Bioluminescence imaging was
carried out in a biological irradiator equipped with an EMCCD (Precision X-Ray Inc, North
Branford, Connecticut), which simultaneously acquired X-ray images of the animal for
anatomical correlation of the bioluminescence signal. After validation of tumor presence,
background images of SWIR fluorescence were taken using the custom SWIR imaging system.
Next, 150 µL of a 1 mg/mL solution of functionalized REs resuspended in PBS was
intravenously injection into the tail vein, and SWIR imaging was performed at baseline, 30
minutes, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 120 hours. During a typical imaging
session, mice were sedated under isoflurane and imaged under approximately 0.15
W/cm2 of collimated 975 nm light. Short-wave infrared emissions were captured
with the InGaAs camera operating with a 1-second integration time.Short-wave infrared signal quantification was performed by matching the perimeter of
tumor bioluminescence to the acquired SWIR fluorescence images. Average signal intensity
as a function of time was measured in the tumors of all animals. These regions of interest
were also positioned on nearby, untargeted muscle to acquire a background, nonspecific
SWIR signal. Tumor to background ratios were calculated by dividing both these values for
each time point and animal.For the lymphatic mapping studies, 10 μL of a 20 mg/mL solution of PEGylated REs was
subcutaneously administered into the forepaw of nude mice. Short-wave infrared imaging was
performed to track nanoparticle drainage over 15 minutes. All mice were anesthetized with
an intraperitoneal injection of a ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine cocktail prior to
imaging.
Measurement of Optical Attenuation and Resolution
Phantom tissue composed of scattering and absorbing agents was used to assess the limits
of signal detection and resolution. Phantom tissue was composed of 1% agarose, 1%
Intralipid (Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) and 170 μM hemoglobin. Increasing
thickness of tissue was layered over a hot spot resolution phantom (Micro Deluxe Phantom;
Data Spectrum Corporation, Durham, North Carolina) with approximately 0.1 g of REs pressed
into its chambers. Short-wave infrared imaging was subsequently performed through the
phantom tissue.
Results and Discussion
Rare-earth-doped nanoparticles were first synthesized according to a well-established
thermal decomposition method and were composed of an ytterbium (Yb)- and erbium (Er)-doped
NaYF4 core surrounded by an undoped NaYF4 shell.[36] Rare-earth doped nanoparticles exhibited uniform morphology under TEM imaging (Figure 1A) and were approximately 17.1 ±
3.1 nm in diameter (Figure 1B), as
measured by DLS. In contrast to Er and Yb-dopedY2O3 nanoparticles,[37] REs exhibited a significantly smaller diameter, a key physical parameter for ensuring
an acceptable pharmacokinetic properties.[38] Upon excitation with 975 nm NIR light, a relatively narrowband of SWIR emission was
observed with λmax at 1535 nm near the anticipated emission peak of the Er dopant
(Figure 1[c]). Qualitative
analysis of RE atomic composition through energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the
predicted dopant concentrations of 20% Yb and ∼2% Er (Figure 1[d]). The observed lattice fringes were
indicative of a predominately hexagonal (β) phase crystalline structure, which has been
previously described as the optimal phase for enabling efficient SWIR emissivity.[33]
Figure 1.
A, Rare-earth-doped nanoparticles display spherical morphology and homogenous size
distribution as shown by TEM. B, Dynamic light scattering confirms uniform RE particle
size distribution. C, Upon NIR excitation at 975 nm, REs displayed bright, narrow
emission at 1536 nm. D, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) profile of REs
confirm the elemental composite of the NaYF4 nanoparticles and confirm the presence of
Er, the rare-earth dopant and SWIR emitter. E, polyethylene glycolylated REs display
narrow size distribution in aqueous solution and are noticeably larger in diameter than
assynthesized Res. F, Transmission electron microscopy imaging of PEGylated REs show a
crystalline nanoparticle encased in an amorphous shell with the boundary indicated by
the red line. DLS indicates dynamic light scattering; NIR, near infrared; PEG,
polyethylene glycol; RE, rare-earth doped nanoparticles; SWIR, short-wave infrared; TEM,
transmission electron microscopy; YF, yttrium fluoride.
A, Rare-earth-doped nanoparticles display spherical morphology and homogenous size
distribution as shown by TEM. B, Dynamic light scattering confirms uniform RE particle
size distribution. C, Upon NIR excitation at 975 nm, REs displayed bright, narrow
emission at 1536 nm. D, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) profile of REs
confirm the elemental composite of the NaYF4 nanoparticles and confirm the presence of
Er, the rare-earth dopant and SWIR emitter. E, polyethylene glycolylated REs display
narrow size distribution in aqueous solution and are noticeably larger in diameter than
assynthesized Res. F, Transmission electron microscopy imaging of PEGylated REs show a
crystalline nanoparticle encased in an amorphous shell with the boundary indicated by
the red line. DLS indicates dynamic light scattering; NIR, near infrared; PEG,
polyethylene glycol; RE, rare-earth doped nanoparticles; SWIR, short-wave infrared; TEM,
transmission electron microscopy; YF, yttrium fluoride.Rare-earth doped nanoparticles were prepared for in vitro and in vivo testing by exchanging
surface-bound surfactant remaining from synthesis with PEG through ultrasonication. In
contrast to unmodified REs, PEG-coated REs were stable in aqueous solution (Supplemental
Figure S1) and exhibited relatively small hydrodynamic diameters (mean = 34 nm) in aqueous
solution (Figure 1[e]). Transmission
electron microscopy imaging validated the DLS results, revealing individual REs encased in
an amorphous coating that likely corresponded to the PEG (Figure 1[f]).A custom SWIR imaging system was engineered and used for assessing the imaging capabilities
of REs (Figure 2[a]). The signal
detection limits of the SWIR imaging system were established using serial dilutions of REs.
Short-wave infrared emission intensity correlated linearly (r
2 = 0.992) with RE concentration (Supplemental Figure S2), and the lowest
detectable concentration of REs was found to be in the single-digit nanomolar range
(assuming an RE molecular weight of 7 × 106 g/mol based on an average diameter of
17 nm and density of 4.21 g/cm3 for bulk NaYF4).[39] Tissue-mimicking phantoms composed of scattering and absorbing agents were used to
assess the limits of imaging resolution. A PET resolution chamber was filled with dried REs
and irradiated through phantom tissue (Figure 2[b]). Short-wave infrared signal could be detected through up to 1 cm of
tissue (Figure 2[c]), and at these
depths, RE localization could be resolved at millimeter resolution (Figure 2[d]).
Figure 2.
A, Schematic of the small animal SWIR imaging system. B, PET chamber filled with REs
and excited at 975 nm. Rod diameters counterclockwise from bottom are 4.8 mm, 4.0 mm,
3.2 mm, 2.4 mm, 1.6 mm, and 1.2 mm. C, Short-wave infrared signal from REs progressively
diminished through increasing depth of phantom tissue, yet signal was still detected
through 1.0 cm of tissue. D, Effects of increasing phantom depth on the SWIR resolution
reveals point fluorescence could be distinguished with millimeter precision using the
4.8-mm-diameter rods as SWIR emission points. RE indicates rare-earth-doped
nanoparticles; SWIR, short-wave infrared.
A, Schematic of the small animal SWIR imaging system. B, PET chamber filled with REs
and excited at 975 nm. Rod diameters counterclockwise from bottom are 4.8 mm, 4.0 mm,
3.2 mm, 2.4 mm, 1.6 mm, and 1.2 mm. C, Short-wave infrared signal from REs progressively
diminished through increasing depth of phantom tissue, yet signal was still detected
through 1.0 cm of tissue. D, Effects of increasing phantom depth on the SWIR resolution
reveals point fluorescence could be distinguished with millimeter precision using the
4.8-mm-diameter rods as SWIR emission points. RE indicates rare-earth-doped
nanoparticles; SWIR, short-wave infrared.Early proof-of-concept SWIR imaging studies were conducted using PEGylated REs for
lymphatic mapping and passive tumor targeting. To assess the in vivo resolving capabilities
of SWIR, lymphatic imaging was performed using PEGylated REs injected into the footpads of
mice. Short-wave infrared imaging revealed bright, concentrated emissions that diminished
from the injection site and progressively travelled through the hind legs toward the abdomen
(Figure 3[a]). Rare-earth doped
nanoparticles were tracked through the lymphatic vasculature and could be resolved at ∼450
μm using the imaging platform (Figure 3[b,
c]). Bright SWIR emissions were observed near the junction of the leg and abdomen
30 minutes postinjection, which corresponded to the nearest draining sentinel lymph
nodes.
Figure 3.
A, Representative image showing tracking of the lymphatic vascular in the hind leg of a
mouse using REs injected into the footpad. B, Raw SWIR image used to assess the
resolution of SWIR signal tracked through the lymphatic vasculature. C, Reveals
submillimeter, micron resolution. D, Representative SWIR image of PEGylated REs
intravenously injected into a mouse exhibiting a 4T1 tumor reveals intense SWIR
emissions emitted from the liver, spleen, and lymph nodes as well as certain vasculature
and passive tumor accumulation. RE indicates rare-earth doped nanoparticles; SWIR,
short-wave infrared; PEG, polyethylene glycol.
A, Representative image showing tracking of the lymphatic vascular in the hind leg of a
mouse using REs injected into the footpad. B, Raw SWIR image used to assess the
resolution of SWIR signal tracked through the lymphatic vasculature. C, Reveals
submillimeter, micron resolution. D, Representative SWIR image of PEGylated REs
intravenously injected into a mouse exhibiting a 4T1tumor reveals intense SWIR
emissions emitted from the liver, spleen, and lymph nodes as well as certain vasculature
and passive tumor accumulation. RE indicates rare-earth doped nanoparticles; SWIR,
short-wave infrared; PEG, polyethylene glycol.Additionally, tumor engraftment studies were used to evaluate the biodistribution of
PEGylated REs and determine their potential for passive tumor accumulation. The mammary fat
pads of athymic, nude mice were inoculated with a bolus of 4T1breast cancer cells.
Following tumor growth, PEGylated REs were intravenously injected into the animals and SWIR
imaging was performed over time. After approximately 5 minutes, SWIR signal became
concentrated throughout the animals, including in the tumor xenografts. Short-wave infrared
emissions were detected in various organs throughout the animal, which were later identified
to correspond to the liver, spleen, and lymph nodes following dissection (Figure 3[d]). Notably, SWIR emissions
were readily identifiable within larger structures of the circulatory network, such as the
aorta.While passive targeting provides a convenient means to screen the tumor accumulation
properties of nanoparticles in vivo, this approach lacks the required specificity to
accurately profile the molecular characteristics of tumor burden in situ. To accomplish
this, REs were engineered to target the αVβ3 receptor, which has been
shown to be highly expressed in a wide variety of malignant tumors, including those of the
brain, breast, and prostate.[40-42] Furthermore, expression of this receptor has been linked to the progression of tumor
angiogenesis and may be correlated with greater tumor malignancy and poorer prognosis.[42-44] To enable targeting of the receptor, the surfaces of PEGylated REs were
functionalized with the cyclic RGDtripeptide, a well-established antagonist of the
αvβ3 integrin receptor.[45,46] Functionalization was achieved via covalent linkage of the tripeptide moiety to the
REs. In contrast to previous work,[28] our approach binds the targeting moiety onto REs via a covalent linkage, which
enables improved in vivo stability and provides greater control of targeting agent deposition.[47] The functionalization process used in our study is straightforward and broadly
applicable to conjugating other targeting moieties with free thiol groups.RGD-modified REs (RGD-REs) were found to be approximately 127 ± 5 nm in PBS, approximately
100 nm larger when compared to nonfunctionalized, PEGylated REs (Supplemental Figure S3). To
determine whether functionalized REs retained the molecular binding characteristics of
soluble RGD, RGD-REs were exposed to both a highly and weakly αvβ3
integrin expressing cell line. High expressing MDA-MD-231breast cancer cells exposed to
RGD-REs were found to exhibit significantly greater SWIR fluorescence intensity than low
αvβ3 expressing MCF-7 breast cancer cells at comparable exposure
concentrations (Figure 4[a]). In
contrast, there was little detectable SWIR emission from any of the cell lines exposed to a
REs functionalized with RAD (RAD-REs), a tripeptide sequence used as a negative control.
Rare-earth-doped nanoparticles functionalized with RAD displayed similar size distribution
and SWIR signal emissivity as their RGD counterparts.
Figure 4.
A, Targeting the αVβ3 receptor using RGD and RAD functionalized
REs. Targeting of functionalized REs was first assessed and quantified in vitro using
MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines exhibiting varying expression of αVβ3. B, Short-wave
infrared signal was captured using the small animal imaging system and tracked over 120
hours. C, Bioluminescence and X-ray imaging were used to identify location of the
luciferase expressing U87 tumor xenografts in relation to the mouse’s anatomy. While
SWIR signals were broadly distributed throughout the animals’ bodies at earlier time
points before being cleared at 120 hours, tumors in mice injected with RGD-REs showed
enhancement of SWIR at 48 hours. Compared to background tissue, RGD-REs showed over a
15-fold signal enhancement compared to tumors in mice injected with RAD-REs (mean values
± SEM; n = 3; *P < .01) determined by Student t
test; A). RE indicates rare-earth doped nanoparticles; SEM, standard error of mean;
SWIR, short-wave infrared.
A, Targeting the αVβ3 receptor using RGD and RAD functionalized
REs. Targeting of functionalized REs was first assessed and quantified in vitro using
MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines exhibiting varying expression of αVβ3. B, Short-wave
infrared signal was captured using the small animal imaging system and tracked over 120
hours. C, Bioluminescence and X-ray imaging were used to identify location of the
luciferase expressing U87 tumor xenografts in relation to the mouse’s anatomy. While
SWIR signals were broadly distributed throughout the animals’ bodies at earlier time
points before being cleared at 120 hours, tumors in mice injected with RGD-REs showed
enhancement of SWIR at 48 hours. Compared to background tissue, RGD-REs showed over a
15-fold signal enhancement compared to tumors in mice injected with RAD-REs (mean values
± SEM; n = 3; *P < .01) determined by Student t
test; A). RE indicates rare-earth doped nanoparticles; SEM, standard error of mean;
SWIR, short-wave infrared.To assess the ability of functionalized REs to preferentially target tumors expressing a
molecular biomarker, RGD and RAD functionalized REs were intravenously administered in
athymic nude mice inoculated with a bolus of luciferase expressing U87 (U87-luc) cells
(Figure 4[b]). Similar to the
naive U87 cell line, U87-luc cells exhibit high expression of the αvβ3
integrin receptor. Bioluminescence imaging was performed to confirm tumor presence and
establish tumor margins of the U87-luc xenografts on each animal. In parallel, X-ray, white
light imaging, and back-lit SWIR imaging were performed to establish an anatomical reference
for the tumor mass. Following injection of functionalized REs, SWIR fluorescence was
observed throughout the animals. Most prominently, SWIR signal was observed in the livers
confirming our previous observation of RE accumulation through passive targeting.
Additionally, SWIR signal was observed near the base of the tail likely representing residue
from the excretion of REs. Short-wave infrared signals were also observed in tumors at time
points shorter than 24 hours following injection with either formulation. However, SWIR
emissions at the site of tumors on mice injected with RGD-REs were found to progressively
increase in intensity with maximal signal observed approximately 48 hours postinjection. In
contrast, mice injected with RAD-REs displayed significantly fainter SWIR signal in tumor
regions signifying less effective targeting.Tumor to background calculations indicated that injection of the RGD-RE formulation
resulted in an approximately 6-fold greater tumor contrast than that observed by RAD-REs
(Figure 4[c]). There was no
measureable background SWIR fluorescence from the animal prior to the injection of the RE
formulations. These results confirm that RGD-REs were able to preferentially target
αvβ3 expressing U87-luc tumors and underscore the potential use of
these agents for imaging molecular biomarkers of clinical significance using SWIR light.An important consideration in the development of a biological contrast agent is its
toxicity profile. The animal studies performed here revealed no apparent adverse effects or
significant changes in animal weight following injection, though a trend in weight loss
(range: 0%-5%) was observed after 5 days (Supplemental Figure S4). Furthermore, complete
clearance of both formulations was captured by SWIR imaging and observed 120 hours
postinjection. Although further experiments are necessary to validate these findings, our
results support the conclusions of others that REs systemically injected into mice do not
result in overt toxicity over the course of several days.[48] More comprehensive toxicity studies are planned in order to fully assess the safety
profile of these agents.The results presented here demonstrate the SWIR imaging capabilities of molecularly
targeted REs. Nevertheless, the use of these agents for biomedical imaging will depend on
both the maximum imaging depth that can be achieved and image resolution. Using our current
imaging approach, we achieved a maximum imaging depth of approximately 1 cm and were able to
resolve anatomical features at micron resolution. However, as detection depth is a function
of contrast-agent concentration, excitation power density, tissue composition, and detector
sensitivity, we anticipate that further improvements in both the SWIR imaging system and
nanoparticle formulation will enable deeper signal detection and enhancement resolution. Our
current results provide strong rationale for utilizing SWIR for various subsurface imaging
applications, such as the assessment of cancer metastasis into lymphatic tissue. In the
context of cytoreductive surgical procedures, such imaging approaches could ultimately
result in better patient prognoses by ensuring the complete removal of malignant tissue and
providing rapid molecular characterization of disease severity.In the near-term, SWIR may find broader use in preclinical studies where imaging at
centimeter depth could be sufficient to visualize molecular targets within small animal
subjects. Incorporating SWIR with other advanced optical imaging approaches, such as 3D
fluorescence molecular tomography, could also be used to offer greater insight into the
spatiotemporal dynamics of disease progression. Furthermore, previous work has highlighted
the ease of synthesizing REs with unique SWIR emissivity profiles by modifying the types of
rare-earth dopants used, providing a route for developing SWIR as a multispectral molecular
imaging modality.[13] Although not explored in our current study, it is reasonable to envision a “RE
cocktail” consisting of an assortment of uniquely emitting REs individually functionalized
with several targeting agents designed to interrogate multiple molecular targets
simultaneously. Such an approach would aid in understanding the complex interactions that
occur among multiple molecular targets during disease progression.
Conclusions
Realizing the promise of optical molecular imaging requires the development of novel
contrast agents designed to both accurately and sensitively resolve the molecular
characteristics of disease through living tissue. Traditionally, optical imaging has relied
on the use of shorter wavelengths of light (<1000 nm) to detect contrast agent in vivo.
However, recent reports have indicated that SWIR (NIR-II) light offers the advantage of
reduced photon scattering and improved tissue penetration compared to shorter wavelength
light. Contrast agents that are detectable by SWIR and engineered to target specific
biomarkers could therefore be useful tools in understanding the molecular dynamics of
disease deep within live tissue using optical approaches. Here, we demonstrate
proof-of-concept molecular SWIR imaging of tumors expressing the αVβ3
integrin receptor using targeted RE nanoparticles. In addition, we showed that SWIR was able
to resolve detailed anatomical features like lymphatic vasculature with high image fidelity
and track probe biodistribution in real time, further supporting the development of SWIR as
a new optical imaging modality. The studies conducted here expand the uses of SWIR-emitting
REs for molecular in vivo imaging and open the possibility for the broader application of
these materials in more advanced imaging techniques.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental_Figures for Rare-Earth-Doped Nanoparticles for Short-Wave Infrared
Fluorescence Bioimaging and Molecular Targeting of αVβ3-Expressing
Tumors by Dominik Jan Naczynski, Jason H. Stafford, Silvan Türkcan, Cesare Jenkins, Ai
Leen Koh, Conroy Sun, and Lei Xing in Molecular Imaging
Authors: Shuo Diao; Jeffrey L Blackburn; Guosong Hong; Alexander L Antaris; Junlei Chang; Justin Z Wu; Bo Zhang; Kai Cheng; Calvin J Kuo; Hongjie Dai Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Guosong Hong; Yingping Zou; Alexander L Antaris; Shuo Diao; Di Wu; Kai Cheng; Xiaodong Zhang; Changxin Chen; Bo Liu; Yuehui He; Justin Z Wu; Jun Yuan; Bo Zhang; Zhimin Tao; Chihiro Fukunaga; Hongjie Dai Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Oliver Schnell; Bjarne Krebs; Erika Wagner; Alexander Romagna; Ambros J Beer; Stefan J Grau; Niklas Thon; Claudia Goetz; Hans A Kretzschmar; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Roland H Goldbrunner Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 6.508