| Literature DB >> 30246081 |
Roshanak Rezaei Kalantary1,2, Massuomeh Rahmatinia1, Masoud Moradi3.
Abstract
Among the pharmaceutical compounds, antibiotics have been paid specific consideration, due to their acute and chronic toxic effects on organisms. Amoxicillin (AMX) is used widely for treatment of bacterial infections. About 80% of amoxicillin excreted unchanged and enters the aquatic environment through different routes including disposal of municipal wastewaters, hospital wastewaters and farm wastewaters. In this study degradation of amoxicillin by UV/Na2S2O8/FeS2 process was evaluated. According to the results, the R-squared and adjusted R-squared were 0.9877 and 0.9828, respectively. The AMX removal efficiency was 93% at optimum conditions. Thus, UV/Na2S2O8/FeS2 process is a useful process for amoxicillin removal.Entities:
Keywords: Amoxicillin; Box-Behnken; UV/Na2S2O8/FeS2
Year: 2018 PMID: 30246081 PMCID: PMC6141797 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Levels of independent variables and experimental range in Box-Behnken design.
| Factors | Range and level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |
| A: Initial AMX (mg/l) | 10 | 40 | 70 |
| B: catalyst load (g/L) | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| C: per sulfate concentration (mM) | 0.5 | 2 | 3.5 |
| D: Time(min) | 30 | 45 | 60 |
| E:pH | 3 | 6 | 9 |
ANOVA test for quadratic model.
| Source | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom | Mean square | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prob> | ||||||
| Model | 14,539.55 | 13 | 111.43 | 198.39 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| A | 1440.1 | 1 | 1440.1 | 255.44 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| B | 41.93 | 1 | 41.93 | 7.44 | 0.0103 | Significant |
| C | 603.56 | 1 | 603.56 | 107.6 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| D | 7428.72 | 1 | 7428.72 | 1317.74 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| E | 3603 | 1 | 3603 | 639.12 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| AD | 21.58 | 1 | 21.58 | 3.83 | 0.0479 | Significant |
| BD | 22.52 | 1 | 22.52 | 3.99 | 0.0490 | Significant |
| CD | 0.22 | 1 | 0.22 | 0.038 | 0.0592 | Not Significant |
| A2 | 49.09 | 1 | 49.09 | 8.71 | < 0.0059 | Significant |
| B2 | 890.71 | 1 | 890.71 | 158 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| C2 | 168.96 | 1 | 168.96 | 29.97 | < 0.0268 | Significant |
| D2 | 30.48 | 1 | 30.48 | 5.93 | < 0.0241 | Significant |
| E2 | 31.59 | 1 | 31.59 | 5.60 | < 0.0278 | Significant |
| Residual | 180.40 | 32 | 5.64 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 142.54 | 27 | 5.28 | 0.70 | 0.7559 | Not significant |
| Pure Error | 37.86 | 5 | 7.57 | |||
| Cor Total | 14,719.95 | 45 | ||||
| R-square | 0.9877 | |||||
| Adj R-square | 0.9828 | |||||
| Pred R-squared | 0.9700 | |||||
| Adequate precision | 55.813 |
Fig. 1Normal probability plot of studentized residuals.
Fig. 2Actual and predicted data of AMX removal.
Fig. 3Response surface plots for AMX removal by UV/Na2S2O8/FeS2 (a) AMX removal versus initial AMX and time (b) AMX removal versus AMX catalyst load and time (c) AMX removal versus persulfate dose and time (d) AMX removal versus pH and time.
| Subject area | Environmental engineering |
| More specific subject area | Advanced oxidation process |
| Type of data | Figures and tables |
| How data was acquired | All degradation tests were done in a reactor batch (Volume of 1 L), equipped with a UV-C lamp (16 W). Three level of each parameter was evaluated using BOX-Behnken design. |
| A High Liquid Performance Chromatography (HPLC) was used for the determination of AMX concentration. | |
| Data format | Analyzed |
| Experimental factors | Measuring of AMX concentrations under various levels of initial AMX concentration, solution pH, Persulfate concentration, dose of FeS2 and contact time to obtain optimum AMX removal from aqueous solutions. |
| Experimental features | Optimization of AMX degradation using BOX-Behnken design. |
| Data source location | Iran University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran |
| Data accessibility | Data are available within paper. |