Literature DB >> 30245916

Z-score maps from low-dose 18F-FDG PET of the brain in neurodegenerative dementia.

David Fällmar1, Johan Lilja2,3, Torsten Danfors2, Lena Kilander4, Victor Iyer5, Mark Lubberink2, Elna-Marie Larsson1, Jens Sörensen2.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging is a central part of diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected neurodegenerative disease. FDG-PET can reveal pathological changes earlier and more reliably than morphological imaging. Diagnostic accuracy can be improved by constructing 3D SSP Z-score maps, showing patterns of significant deficits. During FDG-PET, the subject receives a moderate but not insignificant dose of ionizing radiation, and a dose reduction with retained image quality is desirable. With lower dose, repeated examinations can become a useful tool for monitoring disease progress and potential effects of disease-modifying interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate Z-maps created from low-dose and normal-dose FDG-PET of the brain, with quantitative and qualitative methods. Nine patients with neurodegenerative disorders were prospectively enrolled and nine age-matched controls were recruited through advertising. All subjects (n=18) underwent two FDG-PET scans on separate occasions; a routine and a low-dose scan. The routine dosage of FDG was 3 MBq/kg, and low dosage was 0.75 MBq/kg. 3D-SSP images showing Z-scores of < -1.96 were created from 10-minute summations. The study was comprised of a quantitative part comparing the Z-scores, and a qualitative part where experienced nuclear medicine specialists visually assessed the images. Regarding the quantitative part, Bland-Altman analysis showed a slight constant bias (0.206). Regarding qualitative discrimination between patients and controls, the performance between normal- and low-dose were equal, both showing 72% sensitivity, 83% specificity and 78% accuracy. In this study, visual assessment of 3D-SSP Z-score maps from low-dose FDG-PET provided diagnostic information highly comparable to normal-dose, with minor quantitative discrepancies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG; PET; methodology; neurodegeneration; neuroimaging; radiation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30245916      PMCID: PMC6146163     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging


  14 in total

1.  Pairwise comparison versus Likert scale for biomedical image assessment.

Authors:  Andrew S Phelps; David M Naeger; Jesse L Courtier; Jack W Lambert; Peter A Marcovici; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; John D MacKenzie
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Visualization and Quantification of 3-Dimensional Stereotactic Surface Projections for 18F-Flutemetamol PET Using Variable Depth.

Authors:  Johan Lilja; Lennart Thurfjell; Jens Sörensen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Giovanni B Frisoni; Nick C Fox; Clifford R Jack; Philip Scheltens; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Visual Assessment of Brain Perfusion MRI Scans in Dementia: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  David Fällmar; Johan Lilja; Vilma Velickaite; Torsten Danfors; Mark Lubberink; André Ahlgren; Matthias J P van Osch; Lena Kilander; Elna-Marie Larsson
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Visual assessment versus quantitative three-dimensional stereotactic surface projection fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Vance T Lehman; Rickey E Carter; Daniel O Claassen; Robert C Murphy; Val Lowe; Ronald C Petersen; Patrick J Peller
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 7.794

6.  Longitudinal progression of cognitive decline correlates with changes in the spatial pattern of brain 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Sepideh Shokouhi; Daniel Claassen; Hakmook Kang; Zhaohua Ding; Baxter Rogers; Arabinda Mishra; William R Riddle
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria.

Authors:  Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Claudia Jacova; Steven T Dekosky; Pascale Barberger-Gateau; Jeffrey Cummings; André Delacourte; Douglas Galasko; Serge Gauthier; Gregory Jicha; Kenichi Meguro; John O'brien; Florence Pasquier; Philippe Robert; Martin Rossor; Steven Salloway; Yaakov Stern; Pieter J Visser; Philip Scheltens
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer's disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET.

Authors:  S Minoshima; K A Frey; R A Koeppe; N L Foster; D E Kuhl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk.

Authors:  Bingsheng Huang; Martin Wai-Ming Law; Pek-Lan Khong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with [18F]PET in mild and asymptomatic stages.

Authors:  Alexander Drzezga
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.342

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dose Reduction in Brain [18F]FDG PET/MRI: Give It Half a Chance.

Authors:  Marine Soret; Eve Piekarski; Nathanaëlle Yeni; Alain Giron; Jacques-Antoine Maisonobe; Maya Khalifé; Claire Zaslavsky; Marc Bertaux; Marie-Odile Habert; Aurélie Kas
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Heuristic scoring method utilizing FDG-PET statistical parametric mapping in the evaluation of suspected Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Jeremy N Ford; Elizabeth M Sweeney; Myrto Skafida; Shannon Glynn; Michael Amoashiy; Dale J Lange; Eaton Lin; Gloria C Chiang; Joseph R Osborne; Silky Pahlajani; Mony J de Leon; Jana Ivanidze
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-08-15

3.  The Changes in the 18F FDG Metabolism in the Muscles by the Use of Cuboid Support Insoles.

Authors:  Norihisa Okumura; Yukinori Okada; Keiichi Kumai; Tomomitsu Hosokawa; Jiro Oonuma; Yuichi Takata; Masatoshi Ito
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2022-07-08

4.  Ultra-low-dose in brain 18F-FDG PET/MRI in clinical settings.

Authors:  Marine Soret; Jacques-Antoine Maisonobe; Serge Desarnaud; Sébastien Bergeret; Valérie Causse-Lemercier; Arnaud Berenbaum; Laura Rozenblum; Marie-Odile Habert; Aurélie Kas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.