Literature DB >> 30245536

The Development and Evaluation of a High-Resolution Above Ground Biomass Product for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (2000).

John S Liames1, Joseph B Riegel1, Kristin M Foley1, Ross S Lunetta1.   

Abstract

This study details the development of a U.S. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico above-ground forest biomass (agb) product (baseline 2000) developed by the United States Environmental, Protection Agency (epa) that was compared to another AGB product developed by the U.S. Forest Service (usfs) for the same area. The USEPA product tended to over-predict in areas of low biomass and under-predict in high biomass areas when compared to observed plot data, but compared favorably to a Forest Inventory Analysis (fia) assessment of structure and condition of Puerto Rico forests (72.6 Mg/ha versus 80.0 Mg/ ha, respectively). AGB estimates were highly correlated with reference FIA biomass for both maps at their native spatial resolutions (USEPA: r =0.93, USFS: r = 0.92). AGB mean difference between both products was 33.5 Mg/ha (USFS mean = 106.1 Mg/ha; USEPA mean = 72.6 Mg/ha), a difference not out-of- scope when compared to other biomass comparative studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 30245536      PMCID: PMC6145826          DOI: 10.14358/PERS.83.4.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing        ISSN: 0099-1112            Impact factor:   1.083


  4 in total

1.  Forest inventory and analysis: a national inventory and monitoring program.

Authors:  W Brad Smith
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions.

Authors:  Nancy L Harris; Sandra Brown; Stephen C Hagen; Sassan S Saatchi; Silvia Petrova; William Salas; Matthew C Hansen; Peter V Potapov; Alexander Lotsch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Evaluating the national land cover database tree canopy and impervious cover estimates across the conterminous United States: a comparison with photo-interpreted estimates.

Authors:  David J Nowak; Eric J Greenfield
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

Authors:  Yude Pan; Richard A Birdsey; Jingyun Fang; Richard Houghton; Pekka E Kauppi; Werner A Kurz; Oliver L Phillips; Anatoly Shvidenko; Simon L Lewis; Josep G Canadell; Philippe Ciais; Robert B Jackson; Stephen W Pacala; A David McGuire; Shilong Piao; Aapo Rautiainen; Stephen Sitch; Daniel Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.