| Literature DB >> 30245509 |
Jennifer N Dines1,2, Katie Golden-Grant2, Amy LaCroix3, Alison M Muir3, Dianne Laboy Cintrón3, Kirsty McWalter4, Megan T Cho4, Angela Sun3, J Lawrence Merritt3, Jenny Thies2, Dmitriy Niyazov5, Barbara Burton6, Katherine Kim6, Leah Fleming7, Rachel Westman7, Peter Karachunski8, Joline Dalton8, Alice Basinger9, Can Ficicioglu10, Ingo Helbig10,11, Manuela Pendziwiat11, Hiltrud Muhle11, Katherine L Helbig10, Almuth Caliebe12, René Santer13, Kolja Becker11, Sharon Suchy4, Ganka Douglas4, Francisca Millan4, Amber Begtrup4, Kristin G Monaghan4, Heather C Mefford14.
Abstract
PURPOSE: TANGO2-related disorders were first described in 2016 and prior to this publication, only 15 individuals with TANGO2-related disorder were described in the literature. Primary features include metabolic crisis with rhabdomyolysis, encephalopathy, intellectual disability, seizures, and cardiac arrhythmias. We assess whether genotype and phenotype of TANGO2-related disorder has expanded since the initial discovery and determine the efficacy of exome sequencing (ES) as a diagnostic tool for detecting variants.Entities:
Keywords: developmental delay DNA copy-number variation; epilepsy; exome sequencing; intragenic deletion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30245509 PMCID: PMC6752277 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0137-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Med ISSN: 1098-3600 Impact factor: 8.822
Summary of clinical findings of our patients in comparison to prior cases
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | P12 | P13 | P14 | Sum (%) | Lit[ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paternal allele | c.711-3C>G | c.711-3C>G | c.711-3C>G | Ex 3–9 del | c.94C>T p.R32* | c.94C>T p.R32* | c.265G>T p.G89C | Ex 3–9 del | Ex 3–9 del | c.94C>T p.R32* | Ex 3–9 del^ | 22q11.2 del | Ex 3–9 del^ | Ex 3–9 del | Fig. | Fig. |
| Maternal allele | Ex 3–9 del | Ex 3–9 del | Ex 3–9 del | Ex 3–9 del | c.77G>A p.R26K | c.77G>A p.R26K | Ex 3–9 del | Ex 3–9 del | Ex 3–9 del | c.94C>T p.R32* | Ex 3-9 del^ | Ex 3–9 del | Ex 3-9 del^ | Ex 6 del | Fig. | Fig. |
| Family | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| Age of onset | 5 m | 9 m | 8 m | 1 yr | 18 m | 27 m | 4 m | 18 m | 6 m | 2 yr | 6 m | 9 m | 6 m | 1 yr | 4–27 m | 3.5 m–8 yr |
| Initial symptoms | DD | DD | DD | DD | DD/HG GTC | MC | MC | FS | DD | Ataxia | DD | DD | DD | DD | DD 9/14 Sz 2/14 MC 3/14 UG 1/14 | DD 9/15 Sz 2/15 MC 3/15 UG 1/15 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Arrhythmia | - | - | - | +g | +h | - | +i | - | - | - | - | +j | +c | - | 5/14 (36) | 10/15 (67) |
| SCA | - | - | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | 3/14 (21) | 2/15 (13) |
| Pacemaker | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1/14 (7) | 4/15 (27) |
| ECHO | LVH | ND | N | ↓ fx | DCM, ↓ fx | DCM | Mild ↓ fx | PT | N | N | N | N | N | N | 6/14 (43) | 2/15 (13) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Seizures | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | - | + | - | - | + | + | 10/14 (71) | 12/15 (80) |
| Sz type /EEG | Mult. typesa/EE | GTC | Mult. typesb/EE | Partial complex | HG GTC | n/a | Multifocal, IS | GTC | n/a | HG GTC | EE | n/a | GTC | HG GTC, SE | ||
| Refractory | + | - | + | - | - | n/a | + | - | n/a | - | n/a | n/a | - | - | 3/14 (21) | 1/3 (33) |
^, parental testing not done; +, present; -, absent; d., deceased (age at death); DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; DD, developmental delay; EE, epileptic encephalopathy; EEG, electroencephalopgraphy; FS, febrile seizures; fx, function; GT, gastrostomy tube; GTC, generalized tonic–clonic; HG GTC, hypoglycemic generalized tonic–clonic; IS, infantile spasms; Lit (%), summary of individuals from literature (Lalani et al.; Kremer et al.); LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; MC, metabolic crisis; N, normal; ND, not done; P#, patient #; PM, postmortem; PT, prominent trabeculations; SE, status epilepticus; Sum (%), summary of individuals from our case series; Sz, seizure; TdP, torsades de pointes, U, unknown; UG, unsteady gait; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; w/a, with assistance
aInfantile spasms, myoclonic, tonic, multifocal–bifrontal, and right parietal.
bMyoclonic, myoclonic–astatic, generalized tonic–clonic/EEG findings including epileptic encephalopathy and multifocal epileptiform discharges maximal in the bicentral region.
Fig. 1Pedigrees with variant segregation data (if known) and patient photos.
a Pedigrees from 11 families. b Patient photos from family 1 including patient 1 at 2 years 10 months, patient 2 at 2 years, and patient 3 at 9 months. c Patient photos from patient 11 at 13 years.
Fig. 4TANGO2 gene illustration with a comparison of the molecular variants from the present study and previously described patients.
Variants from the 14 patients described are shown above the gene depiction with red bars for deletions and lines for single nucleotide variants (SNV), and pathogenic variants from prior studies are shown below (light blue bars for deletions and lines for SNV) based on TANGO2 transcript NM152906.6 (2623 bp).
Fig. 2NM_152906.6:c.711-3C>G causes aberrant splicing of . a Sashimi plot showing TANGO2 transcripts isolated form patient 1 and control fibroblasts. Intron 8 is retained in patient 1 transcripts (*). b Semiquantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) validation of aberrant splicing of TANGO2 in patient 1. Primers were designed to amplify exons 5 through exon 9 of TANGO2. The expected product size for a fully spliced transcript is 395 bp, while the expected product size if intron 8 was retained is 1499 bp.
Fig. 3Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patient 1 demonstrating progressive cerebral atrophy. a Axial T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR); sagittal T1 FLAIR at 9 months. b Axial 3D FLAIR; sagittal T1 at 21 months.