Literature DB >> 30245307

Shielding and relaxation in multitasking: Prospect of reward counteracts relaxation of task shielding in multitasking.

Rico Fischer1, Kerstin Fröber2, Gesine Dreisbach2.   

Abstract

Performing two similar tasks at the same time requires the shielding of the prioritized Task 1 from interference of additional Task 2 processing (between-task interference). In the present study we tested how motivational factors such as prospect of reward might drive shifts between increased proactive control, enabling task shielding, and reduced proactive control resulting in relaxed task shielding. In Experiment 1 an instruction-induced prioritization of Task 1 over Task 2 resulted in initially reduced between-task interference. With increasing time on task, however, between-task interference continuously increased, presumably because participants engaged less in proactive control resulting in reduced task shielding. In Experiment 2 the prospect of reward activated proactive control as indicated by reduced between-task interference in the Reward than in the No reward condition. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the performance of a Reward and a No reward group in a between-subject design. Whereas between-task interference again continuously increased over time in the No reward group, indicating a relaxed mode of task shielding, the Reward group displayed constant small between-task interference over time, suggesting maintained high levels of task shielding. Together these findings speak in favor of an impressive flexibility in regulating cognitive control engagement in multitasking situations. This not only shows the capacity for optimization of multitasking performance by motivational incentives but also further supports assumptions of the strategic nature of assumed processing limitations (bottlenecks) in dual-task performance.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crosstalk; Dual task; Multitasking; Proactive vs. reactive control; Reward prospect

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30245307     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  6 in total

1.  Attentional prioritization in dual-task walking: Effects of stroke, environment, and instructed focus.

Authors:  Prudence Plummer; Lori Altmann; Jody Feld; Lisa Zukowski; Bijan Najafi; Carol Giuliani
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Time is of the essence: past selves are not prioritized even when selective discrimination costs are controlled for.

Authors:  Julia Englert; Karola von Lampe; Nexhmedin Morina
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-08

3.  The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks.

Authors:  Victor Mittelstädt; Jeff Miller; Hartmut Leuthold; Ian Grant Mackenzie; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

4.  How Sequentially Changing Reward Prospect Modulates Meta-control: Increasing Reward Prospect Promotes Cognitive Flexibility.

Authors:  Kerstin Fröber; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Task prioritization modulates alpha, theta and beta EEG dynamics reflecting proactive cognitive control.

Authors:  Nathalie Liegel; Daniel Schneider; Edmund Wascher; Stefan Arnau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Using position rather than color at the traffic light - Covariation learning-based deviation from instructions in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Robert Gaschler; Beate Elisabeth Ditsche-Klein; Michael Kriechbaumer; Christine Blech; Dorit Wenke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.