Hagen Bomberg1, Jonas Stroeder2, Kathrin Karrenbauer3, Heinrich V Groesdonk4, Stefan Wagenpfeil5, Matthias Klingele6, Arno Bücker2, Hans-Joachim Schäfers3, Peter Minko2. 1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany. Electronic address: hagen.bomberg@uks.eu. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 3. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 5. Institute for Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 6. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany; Department of Nephrology, Hochtaunus-Kliniken, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop clinical preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative scores for early identification of patients who are at risk of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. SETTING: Single center. PARTICIPANTS: From January 2008 to December 2014, all patients from the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery were included on the basis of the hospital database. INTERVENTIONS: All mesenteric angiographically identified NOMI patients were compared with non-NOMI patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study population of 8,748 patients was randomized into a cohort for developing the scores (non-NOMI 4,214 and NOMI 235) and a cohort for control (non-NOMI 4,082 and NOMI 217). Risk factors were identified using forward and backward Wald test and were included in the predictive scores for the occurrence of NOMI. C statistic showed that the scores had a high discrimination for the prediction of NOMI preoperatively (C statistic 0.79; p < 0.001), intraoperatively (C statistic 0.68; p < 0.001), and postoperatively (C statistic 0.85; p < 0.001). A combination of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk scores demonstrated the highest discrimination (C statistic 0.87; p < 0.001). The combined score included the following risk factors: renal insufficiency (preoperative); use of cardiopulmonary bypass and intra-aortic balloon pump support (intraoperative); and reexploration for bleeding, renal replacement therapy, and packed red blood cells ≥ 4 units (postoperative). The results were similar in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: These scores could be useful to identify patients at risk for NOMI and promote a rapid diagnosis and therapy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop clinical preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative scores for early identification of patients who are at risk of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. SETTING: Single center. PARTICIPANTS: From January 2008 to December 2014, all patients from the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery were included on the basis of the hospital database. INTERVENTIONS: All mesenteric angiographically identified NOMI patients were compared with non-NOMI patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study population of 8,748 patients was randomized into a cohort for developing the scores (non-NOMI 4,214 and NOMI 235) and a cohort for control (non-NOMI 4,082 and NOMI 217). Risk factors were identified using forward and backward Wald test and were included in the predictive scores for the occurrence of NOMI. C statistic showed that the scores had a high discrimination for the prediction of NOMI preoperatively (C statistic 0.79; p < 0.001), intraoperatively (C statistic 0.68; p < 0.001), and postoperatively (C statistic 0.85; p < 0.001). A combination of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk scores demonstrated the highest discrimination (C statistic 0.87; p < 0.001). The combined score included the following risk factors: renal insufficiency (preoperative); use of cardiopulmonary bypass and intra-aortic balloon pump support (intraoperative); and reexploration for bleeding, renal replacement therapy, and packed red blood cells ≥ 4 units (postoperative). The results were similar in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: These scores could be useful to identify patients at risk for NOMI and promote a rapid diagnosis and therapy.